Not or Yes in My Back Yard? A physiological and psychological measurement of urban residents in Taiwan

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105256
Yi-Kai Juan , Yi Chen
{"title":"Not or Yes in My Back Yard? A physiological and psychological measurement of urban residents in Taiwan","authors":"Yi-Kai Juan ,&nbsp;Yi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global urbanization has resulted in a dense concentration of population in cities worldwide. In Asia’s densely populated cities, the existence of “Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY)” facilities is essential for public infrastructure development. However, most NIMBY facilities, such as cemeteries, funeral parlors, electrical towers, garbage dumps, and gas stations, are directly exposed to the urban environment without special environmental design considerations. Additionally, Feng-Shui considerations for the living environments contribute to a negative impression and rejection of NIMBY facilities. This study posits a research hypothesis: Do people experience negative physiological and psychological effects in a NIMBY environment compared to a “Yes In My Back Yard (YIMBY)” environment? This study employed the Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) to gather experts’ perceptions of NIMBY. Subsequently, virtual reality (VR) scenes based on NIMBY and YIMBY fields were introduced. Heart rate variability (HRV) and emotional state questionnaires (POMS) were utilized to measure the physiological and psychological changes among subjects in both environments. Twenty-eight participants engaged in a two-week experiment, and statistical analysis was employed to compare the significant differences in physiological and psychological values in different environments. The results indicated that the participants in the YIMBY environment exhibited more positive physiological responses. The POMS results also supported the notion that the participants generally demonstrated more stable emotional performance in the YIMBY environment. For future considerations, it is recommended that urban environmental planning and design incorporate more YIMBY elements to promote urban residents’ physical and mental health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 105256"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920462400255X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global urbanization has resulted in a dense concentration of population in cities worldwide. In Asia’s densely populated cities, the existence of “Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY)” facilities is essential for public infrastructure development. However, most NIMBY facilities, such as cemeteries, funeral parlors, electrical towers, garbage dumps, and gas stations, are directly exposed to the urban environment without special environmental design considerations. Additionally, Feng-Shui considerations for the living environments contribute to a negative impression and rejection of NIMBY facilities. This study posits a research hypothesis: Do people experience negative physiological and psychological effects in a NIMBY environment compared to a “Yes In My Back Yard (YIMBY)” environment? This study employed the Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) to gather experts’ perceptions of NIMBY. Subsequently, virtual reality (VR) scenes based on NIMBY and YIMBY fields were introduced. Heart rate variability (HRV) and emotional state questionnaires (POMS) were utilized to measure the physiological and psychological changes among subjects in both environments. Twenty-eight participants engaged in a two-week experiment, and statistical analysis was employed to compare the significant differences in physiological and psychological values in different environments. The results indicated that the participants in the YIMBY environment exhibited more positive physiological responses. The POMS results also supported the notion that the participants generally demonstrated more stable emotional performance in the YIMBY environment. For future considerations, it is recommended that urban environmental planning and design incorporate more YIMBY elements to promote urban residents’ physical and mental health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我的后院 "不是 "还是 "是"?台湾城市居民的生理和心理测量
全球城市化导致全球城市人口密集。在亚洲人口密集的城市中,"不在我家后院(NIMBY)"设施的存在对于公共基础设施的发展至关重要。然而,大多数 "不在我家后院(NIMBY)"设施,如墓地、殡仪馆、电塔、垃圾场和加油站,都直接暴露在城市环境中,没有特殊的环境设计考虑。此外,对居住环境的风水考虑也导致了人们对非宜居设施的负面印象和排斥。本研究提出了一个研究假设:与 "Yes In My Back Yard (YIMBY) "环境相比,人们在 "NIMBY "环境中是否会产生负面的生理和心理影响?本研究采用模糊德尔菲法 (FDM) 收集专家对 NIMBY 的看法。随后,引入了基于 NIMBY 和 YIMBY 领域的虚拟现实(VR)场景。利用心率变异性(HRV)和情绪状态问卷(POMS)来测量受试者在两种环境中的生理和心理变化。28 名参与者参与了为期两周的实验,并采用统计分析比较了不同环境下生理和心理值的显著差异。结果表明,YIMBY 环境中的参与者表现出更积极的生理反应。POMS 的结果也支持了这一观点,即在 YIMBY 环境中,参与者普遍表现出更稳定的情绪。出于对未来的考虑,建议在城市环境规划和设计中融入更多的 YIMBY 元素,以促进城市居民的身心健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
Who values urban open spaces? investigating heterogeneity in the capitalization of open space in New York city Editorial Board The planning of urban–rural linkages: An automated content analysis of spatial plans adopted by European intermediate cities Not or Yes in My Back Yard? A physiological and psychological measurement of urban residents in Taiwan Homelessness and nature across landscapes and disciplines: A literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1