Isaac Slevin, William Kattrup, Charlotte Marcil, J. Timmons Roberts
{"title":"Beyond dark money: Information subsidies and complex networks of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast","authors":"Isaac Slevin, William Kattrup, Charlotte Marcil, J. Timmons Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A new, more aggressive stage of opposition to offshore wind energy has arisen in the United States. In this article, we demonstrate how the discourses and strategies of local opposition groups are influenced by relationships with national-level groups and fossil fuel interests. East Coast offshore wind opposition groups are not well-characterized by the previous literature on local renewables acceptance – which describes them as grassroots – nor the top-down depiction of national-level fossil fuel influence, which portrays them as inorganic “astroturf” organizations. We focus on organizations' networks and discourses. First, we map the network of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast, which includes novel, local anti-turbine groups, known climate denial think tanks, fossil fuel interests, law firms, and representatives of the commercial fishing industry. Second, we assess claims made by an anti-offshore wind group in New England using two academic typologies. We discover that local groups receive massive and varied “information subsidies” from the think tanks, allowing them to spread numerous claims emphasizing the downsides of offshore wind. We conclude with a discussion of how this nascent network and these misleading discourses pose dire threats to renewable energy development in the United States.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103829"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A new, more aggressive stage of opposition to offshore wind energy has arisen in the United States. In this article, we demonstrate how the discourses and strategies of local opposition groups are influenced by relationships with national-level groups and fossil fuel interests. East Coast offshore wind opposition groups are not well-characterized by the previous literature on local renewables acceptance – which describes them as grassroots – nor the top-down depiction of national-level fossil fuel influence, which portrays them as inorganic “astroturf” organizations. We focus on organizations' networks and discourses. First, we map the network of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast, which includes novel, local anti-turbine groups, known climate denial think tanks, fossil fuel interests, law firms, and representatives of the commercial fishing industry. Second, we assess claims made by an anti-offshore wind group in New England using two academic typologies. We discover that local groups receive massive and varied “information subsidies” from the think tanks, allowing them to spread numerous claims emphasizing the downsides of offshore wind. We conclude with a discussion of how this nascent network and these misleading discourses pose dire threats to renewable energy development in the United States.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.