Enhancing anticipatory governance to accelerate just energy transitions in Australia

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103839
Chris Riedy
{"title":"Enhancing anticipatory governance to accelerate just energy transitions in Australia","authors":"Chris Riedy","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accelerating just energy transitions requires governance under uncertain conditions created by climate change, deregulated energy markets, policy volatility, accelerating technological development, and changing customer roles and expectations. In such an uncertain environment, there is a high risk that decisions will have unforeseen consequences that harm some actors, creating unjust outcomes. Energy systems must collectively develop the anticipatory capacity to explore future possibilities and the implications of different decisions and pathways for and with all affected actors. This paper assesses the anticipatory capacity of the Australian energy system and identifies ways it could be enhanced to accelerate just energy transitions. It draws on a review of representative industry publications, workshops and interviews with industry stakeholders to evaluate the mix of anticipatory practices, scope of anticipatory work, and types of anticipatory governance that prevail in the Australian energy system. Current practice is dominated by forecasting and normative foresighting approaches that do not sufficiently explore or respond to the diversity of plausible futures. Technological and economic drivers dominate anticipatory work, while politics and values are neglected. Anticipatory governance focuses primarily on assessing or pursuing probable futures to inform strategic policy planning and reduce future risks. The narrow range of current anticipatory practices leaves the sector vulnerable to trend changes, unanticipated customer behaviour, and stranding of assets, all of which can work against just transition. Opportunities exist to enhance anticipatory capacity by adopting a more holistic and coordinated approach, increasing institutional support, developing horizon scanning services and integrating household imaginaries into anticipatory planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103839"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accelerating just energy transitions requires governance under uncertain conditions created by climate change, deregulated energy markets, policy volatility, accelerating technological development, and changing customer roles and expectations. In such an uncertain environment, there is a high risk that decisions will have unforeseen consequences that harm some actors, creating unjust outcomes. Energy systems must collectively develop the anticipatory capacity to explore future possibilities and the implications of different decisions and pathways for and with all affected actors. This paper assesses the anticipatory capacity of the Australian energy system and identifies ways it could be enhanced to accelerate just energy transitions. It draws on a review of representative industry publications, workshops and interviews with industry stakeholders to evaluate the mix of anticipatory practices, scope of anticipatory work, and types of anticipatory governance that prevail in the Australian energy system. Current practice is dominated by forecasting and normative foresighting approaches that do not sufficiently explore or respond to the diversity of plausible futures. Technological and economic drivers dominate anticipatory work, while politics and values are neglected. Anticipatory governance focuses primarily on assessing or pursuing probable futures to inform strategic policy planning and reduce future risks. The narrow range of current anticipatory practices leaves the sector vulnerable to trend changes, unanticipated customer behaviour, and stranding of assets, all of which can work against just transition. Opportunities exist to enhance anticipatory capacity by adopting a more holistic and coordinated approach, increasing institutional support, developing horizon scanning services and integrating household imaginaries into anticipatory planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强预期治理,加速澳大利亚的公正能源转型
加快公正的能源转型需要在气候变化、放松管制的能源市场、政策波动、技术发展加速以及客户角色和期望不断变化等不确定条件下进行治理。在这样一个不确定的环境中,决策很有可能会产生不可预见的后果,损害某些参与者的利益,造成不公正的结果。能源系统必须共同发展预测能力,为所有受影响的参与者探索未来的可能性以及不同决策和途径的影响。本文对澳大利亚能源系统的预测能力进行了评估,并确定了可提高这种能力的方法,以加快公正的能源转型。本文参考了具有代表性的行业出版物、研讨会以及与行业利益相关者的访谈,对澳大利亚能源系统中普遍存在的预测性实践组合、预测性工作范围以及预测性治理类型进行了评估。目前的实践以预测和规范性展望方法为主,没有充分探索或应对各种可能的未来。技术和经济驱动因素在预测工作中占主导地位,而政治和价值观则被忽视。预测性治理主要侧重于评估或追求可能的未来,以便为战略政策规划提供信息并降低未来的风险。目前的预见性实践范围狭窄,使该部门容易受到趋势变化、客户意外行为和资产搁浅的影响,所有这些都可能不利于公正过渡。通过采取更加全面和协调的方法、增加机构支持、开发前景扫描服务以及将家庭想象力 纳入预期规划,提高预测能力的机会是存在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
The threat of AI chatbot responses to crowdsourced open-ended survey questions “Cooperatives of convenience” and corporate appropriation of Ontario's community renewable energy policy Shining a light on disparities: A comparative analysis of residential photovoltaic adoption inequality in Australia and Brazil The effects of institutional layering on electricity sector reform: Lessons from Norway's electricity sector Towards energy justice and energy sovereignty: Participatory co-design of off-grid systems in the Brazilian Amazon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1