Experimental study on bonded and unbonded prestressed precast concrete beamcolumn substructures under penultimate column removal

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119330
Hai-Rong Shi , Bin Zeng , Jun Yu , Chun-Lin Wang
{"title":"Experimental study on bonded and unbonded prestressed precast concrete beamcolumn substructures under penultimate column removal","authors":"Hai-Rong Shi ,&nbsp;Bin Zeng ,&nbsp;Jun Yu ,&nbsp;Chun-Lin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The collapse resistance of prestressed precast concrete frames relies on the tie force of the strands, but the influence of the bond conditions and layout of the strands remains unclear. This study investigates these factors through push-down tests on four beam<img>column substructures under penultimate column removal: one reinforced concrete specimen and three precast specimens (unbonded prestressed, bonded prestressed, and bonded with low-prestress parabolic profile). The results revealed that, compared to the reinforced concrete specimen, the precast specimens exhibited similar performance but were uniformly weaker under compressive arch action. Under catenary action, the precast specimens demonstrated significantly greater ultimate deformation and load-bearing capacity. The unbonded prestressed specimen failed due to wire rupture, impairing the flexural resistance of all its joints. In the bonded prestressed specimen, the bonded strand mitigated this issue but fractured prematurely. The bonded low-prestress specimen achieved the highest deformation and load-bearing capacity due to the enhanced deformation capacity of the low-prestress strand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119330"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018923","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The collapse resistance of prestressed precast concrete frames relies on the tie force of the strands, but the influence of the bond conditions and layout of the strands remains unclear. This study investigates these factors through push-down tests on four beamcolumn substructures under penultimate column removal: one reinforced concrete specimen and three precast specimens (unbonded prestressed, bonded prestressed, and bonded with low-prestress parabolic profile). The results revealed that, compared to the reinforced concrete specimen, the precast specimens exhibited similar performance but were uniformly weaker under compressive arch action. Under catenary action, the precast specimens demonstrated significantly greater ultimate deformation and load-bearing capacity. The unbonded prestressed specimen failed due to wire rupture, impairing the flexural resistance of all its joints. In the bonded prestressed specimen, the bonded strand mitigated this issue but fractured prematurely. The bonded low-prestress specimen achieved the highest deformation and load-bearing capacity due to the enhanced deformation capacity of the low-prestress strand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倒数第二根支柱拆除情况下有粘结和无粘结预应力预制混凝土梁柱下部结构的实验研究
预应力预制混凝土框架的抗倒塌能力取决于钢绞线的拉力,但钢绞线的粘结条件和布局的影响仍不清楚。本研究通过在倒数第二根柱子拆除的情况下对四个梁柱下部结构进行下压试验来研究这些因素:一个钢筋混凝土试件和三个预制试件(无粘结预应力、有粘结预应力和低应力抛物线粘结)。结果表明,与钢筋混凝土试样相比,预制试样表现出相似的性能,但在压缩拱作用下均较弱。在全缘作用下,预制试件的极限变形和承载能力明显更大。无粘结预应力试样因钢丝断裂而失效,损害了其所有接缝的抗弯能力。在有粘结预应力试样中,有粘结钢绞线缓解了这一问题,但过早断裂。由于低应力钢绞线的变形能力增强,有粘结低应力试样的变形和承载能力最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Shear behaviour of deep beams strengthened with high-strength fiber reinforced concrete jackets Design of 3D printed concrete masonry for wall structures: Mechanical behavior and strength calculation methods under various loads Effect of high-strength SCC with and without steel fibres on the shear behaviour of dry joints in PCSBs Utilizing realistic loading histories for the calibration of nonlinear components in seismic analysis Physically-based collapse failure criteria in progressive collapse analyses of random-parameter multi-story RC structures subjected to column removal scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1