Open laminectomy plus posterolateral fusion versus open laminectomy plus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgical approaches for fusing degenerated L4-L5 segment: A comparative finite element study
{"title":"Open laminectomy plus posterolateral fusion versus open laminectomy plus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgical approaches for fusing degenerated L4-L5 segment: A comparative finite element study","authors":"Kishore Pradeep, Bidyut Pal","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Various finite element (FE) studies reported the biomechanical effects of fusion surgeries in the lumbar spine. However, a comparative study on Open laminectomy plus Posterolateral Fusion (OL-PLF) and Open Laminectomy plus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OL-TLIF) for fusing an L4-L5 segment has not been reported in the literature. The present comparative FE study evaluates the biomechanical variations in an L4-L5 segment fused using OL-PLF and OL-TLIF surgical approaches. The three-dimensional implanted models were constructed from a computed-tomography scan dataset using image processing software. The models were simulated for the physiological movements such as lateral bending, flexion and extension. The OL-TLIF model had a considerably larger peak equivalent strain than the OL-PLF model under extension (126 %), lateral bending (88 %) and flexion (13 %). However, in both implanted models, a peak equivalent strain above the compressive yield strain limit of the vertebra (0.007) was observed over 60 % of the L4-L5 fused segment, indicating an imminent post-operative bone failure under the imposed loading conditions. The maximum equivalent strain observed in the disc and endplates of the L3-L4 segment was substantially larger to initiate the adjacent segment degeneration. No discernible biomechanical benefits were observed for the OL-TLIF or OL-PLF approaches in fusing the L4-L5 segment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 104261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Various finite element (FE) studies reported the biomechanical effects of fusion surgeries in the lumbar spine. However, a comparative study on Open laminectomy plus Posterolateral Fusion (OL-PLF) and Open Laminectomy plus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OL-TLIF) for fusing an L4-L5 segment has not been reported in the literature. The present comparative FE study evaluates the biomechanical variations in an L4-L5 segment fused using OL-PLF and OL-TLIF surgical approaches. The three-dimensional implanted models were constructed from a computed-tomography scan dataset using image processing software. The models were simulated for the physiological movements such as lateral bending, flexion and extension. The OL-TLIF model had a considerably larger peak equivalent strain than the OL-PLF model under extension (126 %), lateral bending (88 %) and flexion (13 %). However, in both implanted models, a peak equivalent strain above the compressive yield strain limit of the vertebra (0.007) was observed over 60 % of the L4-L5 fused segment, indicating an imminent post-operative bone failure under the imposed loading conditions. The maximum equivalent strain observed in the disc and endplates of the L3-L4 segment was substantially larger to initiate the adjacent segment degeneration. No discernible biomechanical benefits were observed for the OL-TLIF or OL-PLF approaches in fusing the L4-L5 segment.
期刊介绍:
Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.