Energy-use audit and data envelopment analysis based optimization of tillage and residue management in rice-wheat system of Indo-Gangetic plains

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121924
Tony Manoj Kumar Nandipamu , Sumit Chaturvedi , Prayasi Nayak , V.C. Dhyani , S.P. Pachauri , S.C. Shankhdhar , Subhash Chandra
{"title":"Energy-use audit and data envelopment analysis based optimization of tillage and residue management in rice-wheat system of Indo-Gangetic plains","authors":"Tony Manoj Kumar Nandipamu ,&nbsp;Sumit Chaturvedi ,&nbsp;Prayasi Nayak ,&nbsp;V.C. Dhyani ,&nbsp;S.P. Pachauri ,&nbsp;S.C. Shankhdhar ,&nbsp;Subhash Chandra","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implementing zero and minimum tillage practices, along with residue and nitrogen management, significantly boosts crop production, energy efficiency, and environmental sustainability. The study evaluated energy use in rice-wheat cultivation under various tillage regimes: zero tillage with residue retention (ZTR), conventional tillage with residue incorporation (CTR), minimum tillage with biochar incorporation (MTB), conventional tillage with biochar incorporation (CTB), and conventional tillage alone (CT). These were combined with nitrogen management using biochar-coated fertilizers at different doses. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) with BCC and CCR models on 30 decision-making units, the results indicated that ZTR with 125 % of the recommended nitrogen produced highest grain yield energy (206939.3 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>), followed by MTB. The MTB regime was energy efficient, using 13.7–52.1 % less input energy than other tillage methods. Significant energy savings were observed in irrigation (521 ± 127 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>), fertilizers (173 ± 65 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>), fuel (172 ± 39 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>), and electricity (168 ± 44 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup>). According to the DEA models, 70 % of the DMUs were inefficient in input energy use, while 30 % were efficient. By optimizing tillage, residue, and nitrogen management, up to 20,795 ± 5557 MJ ha<sup>−1</sup> (12.76 %) of input energy can be conserved in the rice-wheat system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 121924"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014812401992X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementing zero and minimum tillage practices, along with residue and nitrogen management, significantly boosts crop production, energy efficiency, and environmental sustainability. The study evaluated energy use in rice-wheat cultivation under various tillage regimes: zero tillage with residue retention (ZTR), conventional tillage with residue incorporation (CTR), minimum tillage with biochar incorporation (MTB), conventional tillage with biochar incorporation (CTB), and conventional tillage alone (CT). These were combined with nitrogen management using biochar-coated fertilizers at different doses. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) with BCC and CCR models on 30 decision-making units, the results indicated that ZTR with 125 % of the recommended nitrogen produced highest grain yield energy (206939.3 MJ ha−1), followed by MTB. The MTB regime was energy efficient, using 13.7–52.1 % less input energy than other tillage methods. Significant energy savings were observed in irrigation (521 ± 127 MJ ha−1), fertilizers (173 ± 65 MJ ha−1), fuel (172 ± 39 MJ ha−1), and electricity (168 ± 44 MJ ha−1). According to the DEA models, 70 % of the DMUs were inefficient in input energy use, while 30 % were efficient. By optimizing tillage, residue, and nitrogen management, up to 20,795 ± 5557 MJ ha−1 (12.76 %) of input energy can be conserved in the rice-wheat system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于能源利用审计和数据包络分析的印度-甘地平原稻麦系统耕作和残留物管理优化研究
实施零耕和少耕耕作法以及残留物和氮肥管理可显著提高作物产量、能源效率和环境可持续性。该研究评估了不同耕作制度下水稻-小麦种植的能源使用情况:保留残茬的零耕作(ZTR)、掺入残茬的常规耕作(CTR)、掺入生物炭的最小耕作(MTB)、掺入生物炭的常规耕作(CTB)以及单独的常规耕作(CT)。这些方法与使用不同剂量的生物炭包衣肥料进行氮肥管理相结合。通过对 30 个决策单元使用 BCC 和 CCR 模型进行数据包络分析(DEA),结果表明,使用 125 % 推荐氮肥的 ZTR 产生的谷物产量能量最高(206939.3 兆焦耳/公顷-1),其次是 MTB。与其他耕作方法相比,MTB 方法的能效较高,可减少 13.7-52.1 % 的投入能源。灌溉(521±127 兆焦耳/公顷-1)、肥料(173±65 兆焦耳/公顷-1)、燃料(172±39 兆焦耳/公顷-1)和电力(168±44 兆焦耳/公顷-1)的节能效果显著。根据 DEA 模型,70% 的 DMU 在投入能源使用方面效率低下,30% 有效。通过优化耕作、残留物和氮肥管理,水稻-小麦系统最多可节约 20,795 ± 5557 兆焦耳/公顷(12.76%)的投入能源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Techno-economic optimization of microgrid operation with integration of renewable energy, hydrogen storage, and micro gas turbine Decomposition analysis of renewable energy demand and coupling effect between renewable energy and energy demand: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1