Culling optimism: Circulating neoliberal affects in entrepreneurial animal disease policy

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104145
Charlotte-Anne Chivers , Damian Maye , Gareth Enticott
{"title":"Culling optimism: Circulating neoliberal affects in entrepreneurial animal disease policy","authors":"Charlotte-Anne Chivers ,&nbsp;Damian Maye ,&nbsp;Gareth Enticott","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using Berlant’s concept of cruel optimism, this paper explores how animal disease eradication can represent an unimaginable fantasy, the pursuit of which is an obstacle to farmers’ emotional and financial prosperity. The paper shows how atmospheres of optimism surrounding disease eradication are constructed and linked to policy mobilities. These apparent <em>trans</em>-national circulations of neoliberal logics of ‘ownership’ provide policy legitimacy at times of crisis, but also disguise the emotional experiences of neoliberal policy lives and serve political interests by marginalising alternatives to the allure of eradication. The paper bases these arguments within an analysis of the development of animal disease policy in England since 1997, and recent interviews and workshops exploring future policy options for disease control with farmers and other stakeholders. Following the development of bovine Tuberculosis policy, the paper shows how the transnational mobility of neoliberal policies promoting farmer ownership were used to legitimise farmer- owned culling companies to control infected wildlife. In describing how these policies unravelled through emotional burnout and disillusion amongst farmers, the paper describes the difficulties of detachment from a relation of cruel optimism, either marked by tragedy and trauma, or an incompleteness defined as ‘attached detachment’. In conclusion, the paper calls for further attention to other rural and agricultural fantasies to shed further light on the inequities of neoliberal life and need for just transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using Berlant’s concept of cruel optimism, this paper explores how animal disease eradication can represent an unimaginable fantasy, the pursuit of which is an obstacle to farmers’ emotional and financial prosperity. The paper shows how atmospheres of optimism surrounding disease eradication are constructed and linked to policy mobilities. These apparent trans-national circulations of neoliberal logics of ‘ownership’ provide policy legitimacy at times of crisis, but also disguise the emotional experiences of neoliberal policy lives and serve political interests by marginalising alternatives to the allure of eradication. The paper bases these arguments within an analysis of the development of animal disease policy in England since 1997, and recent interviews and workshops exploring future policy options for disease control with farmers and other stakeholders. Following the development of bovine Tuberculosis policy, the paper shows how the transnational mobility of neoliberal policies promoting farmer ownership were used to legitimise farmer- owned culling companies to control infected wildlife. In describing how these policies unravelled through emotional burnout and disillusion amongst farmers, the paper describes the difficulties of detachment from a relation of cruel optimism, either marked by tragedy and trauma, or an incompleteness defined as ‘attached detachment’. In conclusion, the paper calls for further attention to other rural and agricultural fantasies to shed further light on the inequities of neoliberal life and need for just transitions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消灭乐观主义:企业动物疾病政策中循环往复的新自由主义影响
本文利用贝兰特的 "残酷的乐观主义 "概念,探讨了根除动物疾病如何成为一种难以想象的幻想,而追求这种幻想又如何成为农民情感和经济繁荣的障碍。本文展示了围绕根除疾病的乐观主义氛围是如何构建并与政策流动联系在一起的。新自由主义'所有权'逻辑的这些明显的跨国流动在危机时期提供了政策合法性,但也掩盖了新自由主义政策生活的情感体验,并通过边缘化根除诱惑的替代方案为政治利益服务。本文在分析英国自 1997 年以来动物疾病政策发展的基础上提出了这些论点,并在最近与农民和其他利益相关者进行的访谈和研讨会上探讨了疾病控制的未来政策选择。根据牛结核病政策的发展,论文展示了促进农民所有权的新自由主义政策的跨国流动性如何被用于使农民拥有的捕杀公司控制受感染的野生动物合法化。在描述这些政策如何通过农民的情感倦怠和幻灭而瓦解时,论文描述了从残酷的乐观主义关系中脱离出来的困难,这种关系要么以悲剧和创伤为标志,要么以被定义为 "附着性脱离 "的不完整性为标志。最后,本文呼吁进一步关注其他农村和农业幻想,以进一步揭示新自由主义生活的不平等和公正过渡的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
‘Never turn your back on the Ocean’: Conversations with Fear on Yuin Sea Country Seeing rivers otherwise: Critical cartography as a form of critical pedagogy The Technopolitics of Hydrogen: Arab Gulf States’ Pursuit of Significance in a Climate-Constrained World Culling optimism: Circulating neoliberal affects in entrepreneurial animal disease policy Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1