Travel distances from institutions designated to detain women and girls to procedural (surgical) abortion facilities in Australia: A geospatial analysis

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Womens Studies International Forum Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2024.103019
Clare Heggie , Anna Noonan , Martha Paynter
{"title":"Travel distances from institutions designated to detain women and girls to procedural (surgical) abortion facilities in Australia: A geospatial analysis","authors":"Clare Heggie ,&nbsp;Anna Noonan ,&nbsp;Martha Paynter","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2024.103019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Women are a fast growing population in prisons in Australia. The growing number of women in prisons challenges the ability of correctional services to meet gendered healthcare needs. People in prisons for women face a number of barriers accessing essential sexual and reproductive healthcare needs, including access to abortion. Distance is one potential barrier to accessing care. The purpose of this study was to create a directory of all institutions of incarceration designated to detain women or girls in Australia (including state-based correctional centres, youth detention centres, immigration detention centres, and secure forensic hospital); create a directory of all known procedural abortion facilities listed in state and territory-based abortion service directories and; measure the distance in kilometres and travel time between institutions of incarceration designated for women or girls and procedural abortion facilities. Among the 49 identified institutions designated to incarcerate women or girls, we identified distances between institutions of incarceration and procedural abortion services ranging from 0.4 to 2604 km, with the largest distances observed in Western Australia. The majority of institutions of incarceration were located between 20 and 100 km away from a procedural abortion facility. Despite decriminalization, the availability of procedural abortion varies greatly across Australia, and inequities may be exacerbated for people in state or youth correctional centres, immigration detention centres, and secure forensic hospitals or rehabilitation units. Distance represents just one barrier to accessing essential reproductive healthcare, and further research is needed to identify additional barriers and implications for health equity, reproductive justice and reproductive autonomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 103019"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524001572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women are a fast growing population in prisons in Australia. The growing number of women in prisons challenges the ability of correctional services to meet gendered healthcare needs. People in prisons for women face a number of barriers accessing essential sexual and reproductive healthcare needs, including access to abortion. Distance is one potential barrier to accessing care. The purpose of this study was to create a directory of all institutions of incarceration designated to detain women or girls in Australia (including state-based correctional centres, youth detention centres, immigration detention centres, and secure forensic hospital); create a directory of all known procedural abortion facilities listed in state and territory-based abortion service directories and; measure the distance in kilometres and travel time between institutions of incarceration designated for women or girls and procedural abortion facilities. Among the 49 identified institutions designated to incarcerate women or girls, we identified distances between institutions of incarceration and procedural abortion services ranging from 0.4 to 2604 km, with the largest distances observed in Western Australia. The majority of institutions of incarceration were located between 20 and 100 km away from a procedural abortion facility. Despite decriminalization, the availability of procedural abortion varies greatly across Australia, and inequities may be exacerbated for people in state or youth correctional centres, immigration detention centres, and secure forensic hospitals or rehabilitation units. Distance represents just one barrier to accessing essential reproductive healthcare, and further research is needed to identify additional barriers and implications for health equity, reproductive justice and reproductive autonomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从澳大利亚指定拘留妇女和女童的机构到程序性(手术)人工流产设施的旅行距离:地理空间分析
澳大利亚监狱中的女性人数增长迅速。监狱中女性人数的不断增加对惩教服务满足性别保健需求的能力提出了挑战。监狱中的女性在获得基本的性保健和生殖保健服务(包括人工流产)方面面临诸多障碍。距离是获得医疗服务的潜在障碍之一。本研究的目的是编制一份目录,列出澳大利亚所有指定关押妇女或女童的监禁机构(包括州惩教中心、青少年拘留中心、移民拘留中心和安全法医医院);编制一份目录,列出各州和各地区人工流产服务目录中所有已知的程序性人工流产机构;测量指定关押妇女或女童的监禁机构与程序性人工流产机构之间的距离(以公里为单位)和旅行时间。在已确定的 49 家指定监禁妇女或女童的机构中,我们发现监禁机构与程序性堕胎服务机构之间的距离从 0.4 到 2604 千米不等,其中西澳大利亚州的距离最大。大多数监禁机构与程序性堕胎设施的距离在 20 到 100 公里之间。尽管程序性人工流产已经合法化,但在澳大利亚各地,程序性人工流产的可获得性仍存在很大差异,而对于州或青少年管教中心、移民拘留中心以及安全的法医医院或康复中心中的人员来说,不公平现象可能会更加严重。距离只是获得基本生殖保健的一个障碍,还需要进一步研究,以确定其他障碍以及对健康公平、生殖公正和生殖自主的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
期刊最新文献
The effect of pregnant women's childbirth beliefs on fear of childbirth Kinship support and coping with infertility: A qualitative study of women struggling with infertility from Delhi-NCR, India Editorial Board Challenging the status quo: A feminist analysis of gender dynamics, motivation, and empowerment in hackathons Thirty years of gender mainstreaming: Evolution, development, and future research agenda through a bibliometric approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1