Environmental supervision distance, government-enterprise collusion and corporate environmental information disclosure

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2024.103710
Bin Wang , Yonghong Ma , Beier Luo , Daqian Shi , Shan Jiang
{"title":"Environmental supervision distance, government-enterprise collusion and corporate environmental information disclosure","authors":"Bin Wang ,&nbsp;Yonghong Ma ,&nbsp;Beier Luo ,&nbsp;Daqian Shi ,&nbsp;Shan Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on the framework of government-enterprise collusion and proactive government regulation, this study examines the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory distance on corporate environmental information disclosure (EID) using data from listed companies in China from 2009 to 2021. The results of the study show that: (1) The closer the geographical distance between the local EPA and the company, the poorer the quality, which verifies the collusion effect. Our results are robust after a series of robustness checks. (2) The collusion effect of geographical distance primarily works by enhancing the ability of companies to seek environmental protection. (3) The impact is greater when the sample company belongs to non-sub-provincial municipal, pollution industry, state-owned, large-scale, and mature enterprises. (4) The central environmental inspections and media attention can alleviate the collusion effect of environmental regulatory distance. This study provides new empirical evidence for the \" distance decay effect \" in geo-economics and offers new insights from the perspective of geo-economics for measuring government-enterprise collusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103710"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024007020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the framework of government-enterprise collusion and proactive government regulation, this study examines the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory distance on corporate environmental information disclosure (EID) using data from listed companies in China from 2009 to 2021. The results of the study show that: (1) The closer the geographical distance between the local EPA and the company, the poorer the quality, which verifies the collusion effect. Our results are robust after a series of robustness checks. (2) The collusion effect of geographical distance primarily works by enhancing the ability of companies to seek environmental protection. (3) The impact is greater when the sample company belongs to non-sub-provincial municipal, pollution industry, state-owned, large-scale, and mature enterprises. (4) The central environmental inspections and media attention can alleviate the collusion effect of environmental regulatory distance. This study provides new empirical evidence for the " distance decay effect " in geo-economics and offers new insights from the perspective of geo-economics for measuring government-enterprise collusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境监管距离、政企合谋与企业环境信息披露
本研究基于政企合谋和政府主动监管的框架,利用 2009 年至 2021 年中国上市公司的数据,研究了环境保护局(EPA)监管距离对企业环境信息披露(EID)的影响。研究结果表明(1)地方环保局与企业的地理距离越近,信息质量越差,这验证了串通效应。经过一系列稳健性检验,我们的结果是稳健的。(2)地理距离的合谋效应主要通过提高企业寻求环境保护的能力来发挥作用。(3)当样本企业属于非副省级城市、污染行业、国有企业、大型企业和成熟企业时,其影响更大。(4)中央环保督查和媒体关注可以缓解环境监管距离的合谋效应。本研究为地缘经济学中的 "距离衰减效应 "提供了新的实证证据,并从地缘经济学的角度为衡量政企合谋提供了新的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
High-speed rail and urban energy efficiency: Evidence from China CEO green background and enterprise green innovation Can the precision poverty reduction policy stimulate enterprise total factor productivity? Government environmental regulation, media attention, and corporate green innovation Population aging, fintech, and agricultural economic resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1