“Rural exploitation” in solar energy development? A field survey experiment in South Korea on solar energy support in rural areas

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103837
Inhwan Ko
{"title":"“Rural exploitation” in solar energy development? A field survey experiment in South Korea on solar energy support in rural areas","authors":"Inhwan Ko","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As renewable energy facilities are predominantly installed in rural areas, the geographical mismatch between the production and consumption of renewable energy is prominent. In various cases of rural opposition to renewable energy development, rural opponents often translate this mismatch into the narratives of “rural exploitation” to mobilize further opposition. These narratives highlight that renewable energy development places growing burdens on rural communities, thereby provoking a sense of distributive injustice among rural residents. Using a regression analysis with data collected from a field survey experiment in South Korea, this study shows that the narratives of rural exploitation decrease support for solar energy among rural residents, particularly if they live in more remote, economically underprivileged rural areas. Our finding highlights that a broader historical context of rural-urban inequality should guide our understanding of the motivations and conditions of rural opposition to renewable energy development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103837"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004286","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As renewable energy facilities are predominantly installed in rural areas, the geographical mismatch between the production and consumption of renewable energy is prominent. In various cases of rural opposition to renewable energy development, rural opponents often translate this mismatch into the narratives of “rural exploitation” to mobilize further opposition. These narratives highlight that renewable energy development places growing burdens on rural communities, thereby provoking a sense of distributive injustice among rural residents. Using a regression analysis with data collected from a field survey experiment in South Korea, this study shows that the narratives of rural exploitation decrease support for solar energy among rural residents, particularly if they live in more remote, economically underprivileged rural areas. Our finding highlights that a broader historical context of rural-urban inequality should guide our understanding of the motivations and conditions of rural opposition to renewable energy development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
太阳能发展中的 "农村开发"?韩国农村地区太阳能支持实地调查实验
由于可再生能源设施主要安装在农村地区,可再生能源的生产和消费在地理上的不匹配现象十分突出。在农村反对可再生能源开发的各种案例中,农村反对者往往将这种不匹配转化为 "农村剥削 "的说法,以动员更多的人反对。这些说法强调,可再生能源开发给农村社区带来了越来越大的负担,从而在农村居民中激起分配不公的感觉。本研究利用从韩国实地调查实验中收集的数据进行回归分析,结果表明,农村剥削的说法降低了农村居民对太阳能的支持,尤其是生活在较为偏远、经济条件较差的农村地区的农村居民。我们的发现强调,城乡不平等的更广泛历史背景应指导我们理解农村反对可再生能源发展的动机和条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Desert or garden? Energy sacrifice zones, territorial affordances and competing visions for post-coal landscapes: The case of the Czechoslovak Army Mine Retrofit information challenges and potential solutions: Perspectives of households, retrofit professionals and local policy makers in the United Kingdom Institutional entrepreneuring for energy poverty: The role of boundary work in developing a collaborative product-service system for household appliances A technology to solve the water-energy-food crisis? Mapping sociotechnical configurations of agrivoltaics using Q-methodology Justice or just plans? Reviewing the energy transition strategy of Brazil's Ceará state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1