Anticipatory stakeholder engagement provides insights for gene drive in invasive species through the case of gene drive grey squirrels

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103939
Sarah Hartley , Robert D.J. Smith
{"title":"Anticipatory stakeholder engagement provides insights for gene drive in invasive species through the case of gene drive grey squirrels","authors":"Sarah Hartley ,&nbsp;Robert D.J. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Invasive and non-native species present a major threat to biodiversity, ecosystem services and quality of life that has resulted in calls for more ambitious and radical management approaches. One such approach is gene drive technology that in theory could remove an invasive species from an ecosystem. In 2019, researchers proposed using gene drive technology to remove invasive grey squirrels from the UK. We use this case to explore what expert stakeholders think about gene drive technology and identify key issues that concern them. Through anticipatory stakeholder engagement, we provide the first empirical stakeholder engagement data for gene drive in Europe. Results reveal six prominent matters of concern: The problem to be solved; efficacy of the gene drive; type of gene drive; existing management alternatives; target organism; and public perceptions. We develop these matters of concern into a heuristic capable of providing insights to those funding, developing and governing gene drive technologies for invasive species management, not just in the case of gene drive grey squirrels but for all potential gene drive applications in conservation. Lastly, we argue that such knowledge-focused engagement would be a productive way to shape and govern gene drive trajectories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103939"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Invasive and non-native species present a major threat to biodiversity, ecosystem services and quality of life that has resulted in calls for more ambitious and radical management approaches. One such approach is gene drive technology that in theory could remove an invasive species from an ecosystem. In 2019, researchers proposed using gene drive technology to remove invasive grey squirrels from the UK. We use this case to explore what expert stakeholders think about gene drive technology and identify key issues that concern them. Through anticipatory stakeholder engagement, we provide the first empirical stakeholder engagement data for gene drive in Europe. Results reveal six prominent matters of concern: The problem to be solved; efficacy of the gene drive; type of gene drive; existing management alternatives; target organism; and public perceptions. We develop these matters of concern into a heuristic capable of providing insights to those funding, developing and governing gene drive technologies for invasive species management, not just in the case of gene drive grey squirrels but for all potential gene drive applications in conservation. Lastly, we argue that such knowledge-focused engagement would be a productive way to shape and govern gene drive trajectories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基因驱动灰松鼠的案例,利益相关者的预期参与为入侵物种的基因驱动提供了启示
入侵物种和非本地物种对生物多样性、生态系统服务和生活质量构成了重大威胁,因此人们呼吁采取更大胆、更激进的管理方法。基因驱动技术就是其中一种方法,理论上可以将入侵物种从生态系统中清除。2019 年,研究人员提议使用基因驱动技术清除英国的入侵灰松鼠。我们利用这个案例来探讨专家利益相关者对基因驱动技术的看法,并找出他们关心的关键问题。通过利益相关者的预期参与,我们首次提供了欧洲基因驱动技术的实证利益相关者参与数据。结果显示了六个突出的关注问题:要解决的问题;基因驱动的功效;基因驱动的类型;现有的管理替代方案;目标生物;以及公众的看法。我们将这些关注点发展成一种启发式方法,能够为入侵物种管理中基因驱动技术的资助、开发和管理者提供见解,不仅适用于基因驱动灰松鼠的情况,也适用于基因驱动在自然保护中的所有潜在应用。最后,我们认为这种以知识为重点的参与将是塑造和管理基因驱动轨迹的有效方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
The role of community leadership in building community adaptive capacity to coastal hazards – Insights from neighborhood networks in Semarang, Indonesia Upscaling marine and coastal restoration through legal and governance solutions: Lessons from global bright spots The power of human narrative: Inspiring action on climate change Balancing stakeholder engagement in climate action: A symbiotic typology approach The application of analytical hierarchy process to assess adaptation strategies for flood and landslides risks: A case study of a multi-risk area community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1