Fomesafen induced ecotoxicological responses, bioaccumulation, and implications for soil ecosystems remediation in three ecotypes earthworms

IF 4.2 1区 农林科学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106215
Yan Ge, Siqi Wang, Siqi Miao, Dongxing Zhou
{"title":"Fomesafen induced ecotoxicological responses, bioaccumulation, and implications for soil ecosystems remediation in three ecotypes earthworms","authors":"Yan Ge,&nbsp;Siqi Wang,&nbsp;Siqi Miao,&nbsp;Dongxing Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fomesafen (FSA) is a herbicide commonly used in soybean fields, but its long half-life in the soil can pose pollution risks to the soil ecosystem. Earthworms, which have an indicative function for soil health and play a vital role in maintaining soil ecological functions, have not been fully studied in terms of their susceptibility to FSA. This study examined the effects of different concentrations of FSA on three ecotypes of earthworms (<em>Eisenia fetida</em> (epigeic), <em>Metaphire guillelmi</em> (anecic), and <em>Aporrectodea caliginosa</em> (endogeic)) and found varying trade-off strategy of their growth and reproduction. When subjected to FSA stress, <em>E. fetida</em> prioritized reproduction, <em>A. caliginosa</em> prioritized growth, while <em>M. guillelmi</em> maintained consistent growth and reproduction, effectively allocating the acquired biomass to reproduction. The study also analyzed the oxidative stress response, gene expression, and an integrated biomarker response. The strongest induction performance of the three ecotypes of earthworms was in the expression of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, POD, SOD, and <em>P450</em> expression, while the performance was significantly different in AChE activity, <em>AChE</em> and <em>HSP70</em> expression, which may lead to differences in toxicity and detoxification mechanisms of earthworms in different ecotypes. The partial least squares-path model (PLS-PM) also showed that the three ecotypes of earthworms exhibited different toxicity, detoxification and regulatory pathways under FSA stress. <em>M. guillelmi</em> had the highest IBRv2 index (28.67–42.90). At the same time, the FSA bioaccumulation tended to be stable with increasing concentration, and its main detoxification ability (GST activity and <em>P450</em> expression) could still maintain the same level as CK at high concentrations, indicating that it is very likely to be a potential earthworm type for FSA remediation. This study firstly provides a comprehensive assessment of FSA's toxic effects on different ecotypes of earthworms and highlights the importance of identifying potential resistant species for soil remediation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19828,"journal":{"name":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 106215"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048357524004486","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fomesafen (FSA) is a herbicide commonly used in soybean fields, but its long half-life in the soil can pose pollution risks to the soil ecosystem. Earthworms, which have an indicative function for soil health and play a vital role in maintaining soil ecological functions, have not been fully studied in terms of their susceptibility to FSA. This study examined the effects of different concentrations of FSA on three ecotypes of earthworms (Eisenia fetida (epigeic), Metaphire guillelmi (anecic), and Aporrectodea caliginosa (endogeic)) and found varying trade-off strategy of their growth and reproduction. When subjected to FSA stress, E. fetida prioritized reproduction, A. caliginosa prioritized growth, while M. guillelmi maintained consistent growth and reproduction, effectively allocating the acquired biomass to reproduction. The study also analyzed the oxidative stress response, gene expression, and an integrated biomarker response. The strongest induction performance of the three ecotypes of earthworms was in the expression of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, POD, SOD, and P450 expression, while the performance was significantly different in AChE activity, AChE and HSP70 expression, which may lead to differences in toxicity and detoxification mechanisms of earthworms in different ecotypes. The partial least squares-path model (PLS-PM) also showed that the three ecotypes of earthworms exhibited different toxicity, detoxification and regulatory pathways under FSA stress. M. guillelmi had the highest IBRv2 index (28.67–42.90). At the same time, the FSA bioaccumulation tended to be stable with increasing concentration, and its main detoxification ability (GST activity and P450 expression) could still maintain the same level as CK at high concentrations, indicating that it is very likely to be a potential earthworm type for FSA remediation. This study firstly provides a comprehensive assessment of FSA's toxic effects on different ecotypes of earthworms and highlights the importance of identifying potential resistant species for soil remediation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种生态型蚯蚓的福美沙芬诱导生态毒理学反应、生物累积以及对土壤生态系统修复的影响
福美双(FSA)是一种常用于大豆田的除草剂,但它在土壤中的半衰期很长,会对土壤生态系统造成污染风险。蚯蚓对土壤健康具有指示性功能,在维护土壤生态功能方面发挥着重要作用,但人们尚未充分研究蚯蚓对 FSA 的易感性。本研究考察了不同浓度的 FSA 对三种生态型蚯蚓(Eisenia fetida(外生型)、Metaphire guillelmi(内生型)和 Aporrectodea caliginosa(内生型))的影响,发现它们的生长和繁殖有不同的权衡策略。当受到 FSA 胁迫时,E. fetida 优先考虑繁殖,A. caliginosa 优先考虑生长,而 M. guillelmi 则保持一致的生长和繁殖,有效地将获得的生物量分配给繁殖。研究还分析了氧化应激反应、基因表达和综合生物标志物反应。三种生态型蚯蚓的诱导表现最强的是CAT、POD、SOD等抗氧化酶的表达和P450的表达,而在AChE活性、AChE和HSP70的表达上表现有显著差异,这可能导致不同生态型蚯蚓毒性和解毒机制的差异。偏最小二乘路径模型(PLS-PM)也表明,三种生态型的蚯蚓在FSA胁迫下表现出不同的毒性、解毒和调节途径。M. guillelmi 的 IBRv2 指数最高(28.67-42.90)。同时,其FSA生物累积量随浓度增加而趋于稳定,其主要解毒能力(GST活性和P450表达)在高浓度下仍能保持与CK相同的水平,这表明它很有可能成为一种潜在的FSA修复蚯蚓类型。这项研究首次全面评估了 FSA 对不同生态型蚯蚓的毒性影响,并强调了识别潜在抗性物种对土壤修复的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
238
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology publishes original scientific articles pertaining to the mode of action of plant protection agents such as insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and similar compounds, including nonlethal pest control agents, biosynthesis of pheromones, hormones, and plant resistance agents. Manuscripts may include a biochemical, physiological, or molecular study for an understanding of comparative toxicology or selective toxicity of both target and nontarget organisms. Particular interest will be given to studies on the molecular biology of pest control, toxicology, and pesticide resistance. Research Areas Emphasized Include the Biochemistry and Physiology of: • Comparative toxicity • Mode of action • Pathophysiology • Plant growth regulators • Resistance • Other effects of pesticides on both parasites and hosts.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of the transfluthrin effects on fertility and pregnancy outcomes: An in-vivo study in rat Fomesafen induced ecotoxicological responses, bioaccumulation, and implications for soil ecosystems remediation in three ecotypes earthworms Fungicidal activity of curcumol against Phytophthora capsici via inhibiting phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and its systemic translocation in plants Functional characterization of four antenna-enriched odorant binding proteins in Rhaphuma horsfieldi reveals the importance of RhorOBP1 in odorant recognition and insecticide resistance Identification and characterization of ATP-binding cassette transporters involved in chlorantraniliprole tolerance of model insect Drosophila melanogaster and agricultural pest Spodoptera frugiperda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1