Short-term androgen deprivation therapy and high-dose radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: Results from the GETUG 14 randomized phase III trial

N. Demogeot , P. Sargos , N. Sahki , S. Guérif , R. De Crevoisier , G. Calais , J.M. Hannoun Levi , G. Bouche , C. Hennequin , J. Cretin , Y. Belkacemi , J. Khalifa , D. Azria , A. Grandgirard , P. Pommier , J.M. Simon , C. Leger , V. Beckendorf , B. Dubray , S. Supiot
{"title":"Short-term androgen deprivation therapy and high-dose radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: Results from the GETUG 14 randomized phase III trial","authors":"N. Demogeot ,&nbsp;P. Sargos ,&nbsp;N. Sahki ,&nbsp;S. Guérif ,&nbsp;R. De Crevoisier ,&nbsp;G. Calais ,&nbsp;J.M. Hannoun Levi ,&nbsp;G. Bouche ,&nbsp;C. Hennequin ,&nbsp;J. Cretin ,&nbsp;Y. Belkacemi ,&nbsp;J. Khalifa ,&nbsp;D. Azria ,&nbsp;A. Grandgirard ,&nbsp;P. Pommier ,&nbsp;J.M. Simon ,&nbsp;C. Leger ,&nbsp;V. Beckendorf ,&nbsp;B. Dubray ,&nbsp;S. Supiot","doi":"10.1016/j.fpurol.2024.07.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Few studies compared short-term androgen deprivation (STADT) with high-dose radiotherapy (STADT-RT) versus high dose radiotherapy (RT) alone in localized prostate cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The GETUG 14 study randomized 376 patients between RT (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->191) and STADT-RT (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->179). RT dose was 80<!--> <!-->Gy in both arms and STADT was 4-month flutamide, starting 2 months before irradiation and 4-month triptorelin, starting with irradiation. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), toxicity and quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a median follow-up of 84 months, five-year DFS was 76% in RT arm versus 84% in STADT-RT arm (hazard radio (HR)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.64; (95% CI 0.43–0.89); <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02). ADT had a positive impact on BFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.45; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and MFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.5; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.09) but not on OS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.22; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.54). No difference was fond in terms of gastro intestinal (26% of grade<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->1 in both arm, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.97) and genito-urinary toxicity (39% for RT and 42% for STADT-RT, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.55). Similarly, no difference was found in quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>STADT improves DFS in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving high dose (80<!--> <!-->Gy) RT, without any deterioration in the safety profile.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34947,"journal":{"name":"Progres en Urologie - FMC","volume":"34 7","pages":"Page S36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progres en Urologie - FMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761676X24001585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Few studies compared short-term androgen deprivation (STADT) with high-dose radiotherapy (STADT-RT) versus high dose radiotherapy (RT) alone in localized prostate cancer.

Methods

The GETUG 14 study randomized 376 patients between RT (n = 191) and STADT-RT (n = 179). RT dose was 80 Gy in both arms and STADT was 4-month flutamide, starting 2 months before irradiation and 4-month triptorelin, starting with irradiation. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), toxicity and quality of life.

Results

With a median follow-up of 84 months, five-year DFS was 76% in RT arm versus 84% in STADT-RT arm (hazard radio (HR) = 0.64; (95% CI 0.43–0.89); P = 0.02). ADT had a positive impact on BFS (HR = 0.45; P = 0.001) and MFS (HR = 0.5; P = 0.09) but not on OS (HR = 1.22; P = 0.54). No difference was fond in terms of gastro intestinal (26% of grade > 1 in both arm, P = 0.97) and genito-urinary toxicity (39% for RT and 42% for STADT-RT, P = 0.55). Similarly, no difference was found in quality of life.

Conclusion

STADT improves DFS in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving high dose (80 Gy) RT, without any deterioration in the safety profile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中高危局部前列腺癌的短期雄激素剥夺疗法和大剂量放疗:GETUG 14 随机 III 期试验的结果
方法 GETUG 14 研究将 376 名患者随机分为 RT 组(191 人)和 STADT-RT 组(179 人)。两组的RT剂量均为80 Gy,STADT为照射前2个月开始的为期4个月的氟他胺和照射时开始的为期4个月的曲普瑞林。无病生存期(DFS)是主要终点。结果中位随访84个月,RT治疗组的5年无病生存率为76%,STADT-RT治疗组为84%(危险射频(HR)=0.64;(95% CI 0.43-0.89);P=0.02)。ADT 对 BFS(HR = 0.45;P = 0.001)和 MFS(HR = 0.5;P = 0.09)有积极影响,但对 OS(HR = 1.22;P = 0.54)无积极影响。胃肠道毒性(两组均为26%,1级,P = 0.97)和泌尿生殖系统毒性(RT为39%,STADT-RT为42%,P = 0.55)方面没有差异。结论STADT可改善接受大剂量(80 Gy)RT治疗的中度和高危前列腺癌患者的DFS,但安全性没有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progres en Urologie - FMC
Progres en Urologie - FMC Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
211
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board L’engainement péri-nerveux sur biopsies prostatiques avec fusion Échographie-IRM : marqueur indépendant d’extension extra-capsulaire sur pièce de prostatectomie Comment je fais une urétéroscopie diagnostique +/− thérapeutique pour tumeur des voies excrétrices ? Comment inverser la position du canal opérateur sur un urétéroscope flexible numérique ? Cancer de prostate et liste d’attente de transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1