Short-term androgen deprivation therapy and high-dose radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: Results from the GETUG 14 randomized phase III trial

Q4 Medicine Progres en Urologie - FMC Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.fpurol.2024.07.051
N. Demogeot , P. Sargos , N. Sahki , S. Guérif , R. De Crevoisier , G. Calais , J.M. Hannoun Levi , G. Bouche , C. Hennequin , J. Cretin , Y. Belkacemi , J. Khalifa , D. Azria , A. Grandgirard , P. Pommier , J.M. Simon , C. Leger , V. Beckendorf , B. Dubray , S. Supiot
{"title":"Short-term androgen deprivation therapy and high-dose radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: Results from the GETUG 14 randomized phase III trial","authors":"N. Demogeot ,&nbsp;P. Sargos ,&nbsp;N. Sahki ,&nbsp;S. Guérif ,&nbsp;R. De Crevoisier ,&nbsp;G. Calais ,&nbsp;J.M. Hannoun Levi ,&nbsp;G. Bouche ,&nbsp;C. Hennequin ,&nbsp;J. Cretin ,&nbsp;Y. Belkacemi ,&nbsp;J. Khalifa ,&nbsp;D. Azria ,&nbsp;A. Grandgirard ,&nbsp;P. Pommier ,&nbsp;J.M. Simon ,&nbsp;C. Leger ,&nbsp;V. Beckendorf ,&nbsp;B. Dubray ,&nbsp;S. Supiot","doi":"10.1016/j.fpurol.2024.07.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Few studies compared short-term androgen deprivation (STADT) with high-dose radiotherapy (STADT-RT) versus high dose radiotherapy (RT) alone in localized prostate cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The GETUG 14 study randomized 376 patients between RT (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->191) and STADT-RT (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->179). RT dose was 80<!--> <!-->Gy in both arms and STADT was 4-month flutamide, starting 2 months before irradiation and 4-month triptorelin, starting with irradiation. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), toxicity and quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a median follow-up of 84 months, five-year DFS was 76% in RT arm versus 84% in STADT-RT arm (hazard radio (HR)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.64; (95% CI 0.43–0.89); <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02). ADT had a positive impact on BFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.45; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and MFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.5; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.09) but not on OS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.22; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.54). No difference was fond in terms of gastro intestinal (26% of grade<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->1 in both arm, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.97) and genito-urinary toxicity (39% for RT and 42% for STADT-RT, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.55). Similarly, no difference was found in quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>STADT improves DFS in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving high dose (80<!--> <!-->Gy) RT, without any deterioration in the safety profile.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34947,"journal":{"name":"Progres en Urologie - FMC","volume":"34 7","pages":"Page S36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progres en Urologie - FMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761676X24001585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Few studies compared short-term androgen deprivation (STADT) with high-dose radiotherapy (STADT-RT) versus high dose radiotherapy (RT) alone in localized prostate cancer.

Methods

The GETUG 14 study randomized 376 patients between RT (n = 191) and STADT-RT (n = 179). RT dose was 80 Gy in both arms and STADT was 4-month flutamide, starting 2 months before irradiation and 4-month triptorelin, starting with irradiation. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), toxicity and quality of life.

Results

With a median follow-up of 84 months, five-year DFS was 76% in RT arm versus 84% in STADT-RT arm (hazard radio (HR) = 0.64; (95% CI 0.43–0.89); P = 0.02). ADT had a positive impact on BFS (HR = 0.45; P = 0.001) and MFS (HR = 0.5; P = 0.09) but not on OS (HR = 1.22; P = 0.54). No difference was fond in terms of gastro intestinal (26% of grade > 1 in both arm, P = 0.97) and genito-urinary toxicity (39% for RT and 42% for STADT-RT, P = 0.55). Similarly, no difference was found in quality of life.

Conclusion

STADT improves DFS in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving high dose (80 Gy) RT, without any deterioration in the safety profile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中高危局部前列腺癌的短期雄激素剥夺疗法和大剂量放疗:GETUG 14 随机 III 期试验的结果
方法 GETUG 14 研究将 376 名患者随机分为 RT 组(191 人)和 STADT-RT 组(179 人)。两组的RT剂量均为80 Gy,STADT为照射前2个月开始的为期4个月的氟他胺和照射时开始的为期4个月的曲普瑞林。无病生存期(DFS)是主要终点。结果中位随访84个月,RT治疗组的5年无病生存率为76%,STADT-RT治疗组为84%(危险射频(HR)=0.64;(95% CI 0.43-0.89);P=0.02)。ADT 对 BFS(HR = 0.45;P = 0.001)和 MFS(HR = 0.5;P = 0.09)有积极影响,但对 OS(HR = 1.22;P = 0.54)无积极影响。胃肠道毒性(两组均为26%,1级,P = 0.97)和泌尿生殖系统毒性(RT为39%,STADT-RT为42%,P = 0.55)方面没有差异。结论STADT可改善接受大剂量(80 Gy)RT治疗的中度和高危前列腺癌患者的DFS,但安全性没有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progres en Urologie - FMC
Progres en Urologie - FMC Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
211
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Résultats et facteurs prédictifs de complications après néphrectomie et thrombectomie cave Prise en charge de l’énurésie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent Méthodologie et interprétation du bilan urodynamique chez l’enfant : enjeux et spécificités Éjaculation prématurée : le point sur les recommandations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1