Reimagining entrepreneurship in the Anthropocene through a multispecies relations approach

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Venturing Insights Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00507
Bastian Thomsen , Jarrod Vassallo , Christopher Wright , Suwen Chen , Jennifer Thomsen , Daniel Villar , Andrew Gosler , Talitha Best , Anant Deshwal , Sarah Coose , Roger Such , Suvi Huikuri , Samuel R. Fennell , María A. Hincapié , Domenic Winfrey , Benjamin H. Mirin , Ami Pekrul , Emma Riley , Olav Muurlink
{"title":"Reimagining entrepreneurship in the Anthropocene through a multispecies relations approach","authors":"Bastian Thomsen ,&nbsp;Jarrod Vassallo ,&nbsp;Christopher Wright ,&nbsp;Suwen Chen ,&nbsp;Jennifer Thomsen ,&nbsp;Daniel Villar ,&nbsp;Andrew Gosler ,&nbsp;Talitha Best ,&nbsp;Anant Deshwal ,&nbsp;Sarah Coose ,&nbsp;Roger Such ,&nbsp;Suvi Huikuri ,&nbsp;Samuel R. Fennell ,&nbsp;María A. Hincapié ,&nbsp;Domenic Winfrey ,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Mirin ,&nbsp;Ami Pekrul ,&nbsp;Emma Riley ,&nbsp;Olav Muurlink","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article extends the entrepreneurship literature by presenting a multispecies lens that attends to the rights, agency, and welfare of nonhumans in the ecological and climate change crises. It responds to calls for rethinking entrepreneurship beyond anthropocentrism, integrating insights from multispecies studies and philosophical ethology. The multispecies lens framework amalgamates humans and nonhumans as equal partners in entrepreneurial endeavors. Based on seven years of field research, including over 200 interviews, participant observation, and archival data, the article uses meta-ethnographic analysis to synthesize findings from four related multispecies studies and develop a line-of-argument analysis. Three themes showcase how multispecies relations can be reconciled in theory and practice: 1) community engagement and environmental education, 2) the interdependency of species through One Welfare, and 3) organizing for intrinsic value over profit. These themes shape the multispecies lens in entrepreneurship framework, offering a foundation for scholars and practitioners to consider nonhumans as <em>equal partners</em> within capitalist endeavors. The article concludes with recommendations for fostering equitable multispecies partnerships in entrepreneurship, if it's not already too late given the dire circumstances of the Anthropocene.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article e00507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673424000593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article extends the entrepreneurship literature by presenting a multispecies lens that attends to the rights, agency, and welfare of nonhumans in the ecological and climate change crises. It responds to calls for rethinking entrepreneurship beyond anthropocentrism, integrating insights from multispecies studies and philosophical ethology. The multispecies lens framework amalgamates humans and nonhumans as equal partners in entrepreneurial endeavors. Based on seven years of field research, including over 200 interviews, participant observation, and archival data, the article uses meta-ethnographic analysis to synthesize findings from four related multispecies studies and develop a line-of-argument analysis. Three themes showcase how multispecies relations can be reconciled in theory and practice: 1) community engagement and environmental education, 2) the interdependency of species through One Welfare, and 3) organizing for intrinsic value over profit. These themes shape the multispecies lens in entrepreneurship framework, offering a foundation for scholars and practitioners to consider nonhumans as equal partners within capitalist endeavors. The article concludes with recommendations for fostering equitable multispecies partnerships in entrepreneurship, if it's not already too late given the dire circumstances of the Anthropocene.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过多物种关系方法重新认识人类世的创业精神
本文从多物种视角出发,关注生态和气候变化危机中非人类的权利、能动性和福利,从而扩展了创业文献。它响应了超越人类中心主义重新思考创业精神的呼吁,整合了多物种研究和哲学伦理学的见解。多物种视角框架将人类和非人类作为平等的合作伙伴共同参与创业活动。文章基于七年的实地研究,包括 200 多次访谈、参与观察和档案数据,采用元人种学分析方法综合了四项相关多物种研究的结果,并进行了论证分析。三个主题展示了如何在理论和实践中协调多物种关系:1)社区参与和环境教育;2)通过 "一个福利 "实现物种间的相互依存;3)组织内在价值高于利润。这些主题塑造了创业框架中的多物种视角,为学者和从业者将非人类视为资本主义事业中的平等伙伴奠定了基础。文章最后提出了在创业过程中促进平等的多物种伙伴关系的建议,如果在人类世的严峻形势下还为时不晚的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Empirical entrepreneurial ecosystem research: A guide to creating multilevel datasets The myth of entrepreneurship as a tool: Reorienting business venturing as a goal in itself in a post-growth society Self-employment and inflammation in older adults: Examining biomarkers in the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe Not all leavers are equal: How rank and destination influence enforcement of restrictive covenants How sector fluidity (knowledge-intensiveness and innovation) shapes startups’ resilience during crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1