Blockchain-based crowdsourcing for human intelligence tasks with dual fairness

IF 6.9 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Blockchain-Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100213
Yihuai Liang , Yan Li , Byeong-Seok Shin
{"title":"Blockchain-based crowdsourcing for human intelligence tasks with dual fairness","authors":"Yihuai Liang ,&nbsp;Yan Li ,&nbsp;Byeong-Seok Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human intelligence tasks (HITs), such as labeling images for machine learning, are widely utilized for crowdsourcing human knowledge. Centralized crowdsourcing platforms face challenges of a single point of failure and a lack of service transparency. Existing blockchain-based crowdsourcing approaches overlook the low scalability problem of permissionless blockchains or inconveniently rely on existing ground-truth data as the root of trust in evaluating the quality of workers' answers. We propose a blockchain-based crowdsourcing scheme for ensuring dual fairness (i.e., preventing false reporting and free riding) and improving on-chain efficiency concerning on-chain storage and smart contract computation. The proposed scheme does not rely on trusted authorities but rather depends on a public blockchain to guarantee dual fairness. An efficient and publicly verifiable truth discovery scheme is designed based on majority voting and cryptographic accumulators. This truth discovery scheme aims at inferring ground truth from workers' answers. The ground truth is further utilized to estimate the quality of workers' answers. Additionally, a novel blockchain-based protocol is designed to further reduce on-chain costs while ensuring truthfulness. The scheme has O(<em>n</em>) complexity for both on-chain storage and smart contract computation, regardless of the number of questions, where <em>n</em> denotes the number of workers. Formal security analysis is provided, and extensive experiments are conducted to evaluate its effectiveness and performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53141,"journal":{"name":"Blockchain-Research and Applications","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blockchain-Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720924000265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human intelligence tasks (HITs), such as labeling images for machine learning, are widely utilized for crowdsourcing human knowledge. Centralized crowdsourcing platforms face challenges of a single point of failure and a lack of service transparency. Existing blockchain-based crowdsourcing approaches overlook the low scalability problem of permissionless blockchains or inconveniently rely on existing ground-truth data as the root of trust in evaluating the quality of workers' answers. We propose a blockchain-based crowdsourcing scheme for ensuring dual fairness (i.e., preventing false reporting and free riding) and improving on-chain efficiency concerning on-chain storage and smart contract computation. The proposed scheme does not rely on trusted authorities but rather depends on a public blockchain to guarantee dual fairness. An efficient and publicly verifiable truth discovery scheme is designed based on majority voting and cryptographic accumulators. This truth discovery scheme aims at inferring ground truth from workers' answers. The ground truth is further utilized to estimate the quality of workers' answers. Additionally, a novel blockchain-based protocol is designed to further reduce on-chain costs while ensuring truthfulness. The scheme has O(n) complexity for both on-chain storage and smart contract computation, regardless of the number of questions, where n denotes the number of workers. Formal security analysis is provided, and extensive experiments are conducted to evaluate its effectiveness and performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于区块链的人类智能任务众包具有双重公平性
人类智能任务(HIT),如为机器学习标记图像,被广泛用于人类知识的众包。集中式众包平台面临着单点故障和缺乏服务透明度的挑战。现有的基于区块链的众包方法忽视了无权限区块链的低可扩展性问题,或者不便依赖现有的地面实况数据作为评估工人回答质量的信任根源。我们提出了一种基于区块链的众包方案,以确保双重公平性(即防止虚假报告和搭便车),并提高链上存储和智能合约计算的效率。所提出的方案不依赖于可信机构,而是依靠公共区块链来保证双重公平性。基于多数投票和加密累积器,设计了一种高效且可公开验证的真相发现方案。该真相发现方案旨在从工人的答案中推断出基本真相。基础真相可进一步用于估算工人答案的质量。此外,还设计了一种基于区块链的新型协议,以进一步降低链上成本,同时确保真实性。该方案的链上存储和智能合约计算复杂度均为 O(n),与问题数量无关,其中 n 表示工人数量。我们提供了正式的安全分析,并进行了大量实验来评估其有效性和性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Blockchain: Research and Applications is an international, peer reviewed journal for researchers, engineers, and practitioners to present the latest advances and innovations in blockchain research. The journal publishes theoretical and applied papers in established and emerging areas of blockchain research to shape the future of blockchain technology.
期刊最新文献
Robust cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio blockchain network using SHA-3 algorithm Partial pre-image attack on Proof-of-Work based blockchains Dual-blockchain based multi-layer grouping federated learning scheme for heterogeneous data in industrial IoT How can the holder trust the verifier? A CP-ABPRE-based solution to control the access to claims in a Self-Sovereign-Identity scenario Privacy-preserving pathological data sharing among multiple remote parties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1