Knowledge substitutability and complementarity in scientific collaboration

IF 3.4 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101601
Kexin Lin , Beibei Hu , Zixun Li , Yi Bu , Xianlei Dong
{"title":"Knowledge substitutability and complementarity in scientific collaboration","authors":"Kexin Lin ,&nbsp;Beibei Hu ,&nbsp;Zixun Li ,&nbsp;Yi Bu ,&nbsp;Xianlei Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the substitutability and complementarity in scientific collaboration is of great significance to reduce the costs of team building and enhance the team's research performance. In this paper, knowledge substitutability in scientific collaboration characterizes similar properties shared during the (re)combination process, and knowledge complementarity describes the synergistic effect created by different knowledge combinations. This paper aims to explore the influence of knowledge substitutability and complementarity on research performance based on the American Physical Society dataset. Overall, we find that knowledge substitutability negatively influences scientists’ research performance, while knowledge complementarity has a positive effect. However, the analysis reveals that the positive correlation between knowledge complementarity and research performance only exists for scientists with small-sized teams, while scientists with large-sized teams are not significantly influenced by the complementarity. This paper provides a new perspective and practical insights into team formation and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 1","pages":"Article 101601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724001135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the substitutability and complementarity in scientific collaboration is of great significance to reduce the costs of team building and enhance the team's research performance. In this paper, knowledge substitutability in scientific collaboration characterizes similar properties shared during the (re)combination process, and knowledge complementarity describes the synergistic effect created by different knowledge combinations. This paper aims to explore the influence of knowledge substitutability and complementarity on research performance based on the American Physical Society dataset. Overall, we find that knowledge substitutability negatively influences scientists’ research performance, while knowledge complementarity has a positive effect. However, the analysis reveals that the positive correlation between knowledge complementarity and research performance only exists for scientists with small-sized teams, while scientists with large-sized teams are not significantly influenced by the complementarity. This paper provides a new perspective and practical insights into team formation and management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学合作中的知识可替代性和互补性
了解科学合作中的可替代性和互补性对于降低团队建设成本、提高团队研究绩效具有重要意义。在本文中,科学合作中的知识可替代性表征了(再)组合过程中共享的相似属性,而知识互补性则描述了不同知识组合所产生的协同效应。本文旨在以美国物理学会数据集为基础,探讨知识可替代性和互补性对科研绩效的影响。总体而言,我们发现知识可替代性对科学家的研究绩效有负面影响,而知识互补性则有正面影响。然而,分析表明,知识互补性与研究绩效之间的正相关关系只存在于小规模团队的科学家身上,而大规模团队的科学家受知识互补性的影响并不显著。本文为团队组建和管理提供了新的视角和实用见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Informetrics
Journal of Informetrics Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.
期刊最新文献
Sequential citation counts prediction enhanced by dynamic contents Avoiding the pitfalls of direct linkage: A novelty-driven approach to measuring scientific impact on patents Identifying potential sleeping beauties based on dynamic time warping algorithm and citation curve benchmarking Acknowledging the new invisible colleague: Addressing the recognition of Open AI contributions in in scientific publishing Integrating persistence process into the analysis of technology convergence using STERGM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1