Flexible operation space of hydro–hydrogen–based hybrid power systems

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115114
Yu Gong , Tingxi Liu , Pan Liu , Limin Duan
{"title":"Flexible operation space of hydro–hydrogen–based hybrid power systems","authors":"Yu Gong ,&nbsp;Tingxi Liu ,&nbsp;Pan Liu ,&nbsp;Limin Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Schedulable hydropower and hydrogen power provide essential flexibility to mitigate variability of renewables such as wind and photovoltaic power. Previous research has focused on the flexibility of power systems utilizing a single adjustable source (e.g., hydropower). However, joint flexibility of combining adjustable hydropower and hydrogen power has rarely been explored simultaneously. This study aims to establish a joint flexible operation framework for hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power systems. Initially, the forecast uncertainties are quantified regarding the inflow as well as the combined wind and photovoltaic power. Subsequently, a tri-objective optimization model is formulated to maximize operation benefits while enhancing joint flexibility in managing water levels and allocating power to hydrogen production, deriving the flexible operation space. Finally, the operation space's effectiveness is validated by stochastic simulation. Results from a case study using China's Ertan hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power system indicated that the minimum operation benefit derived from the decisions within the operation space decreased with increasing flexibilities of both the water level and power allocation to hydrogen production. The benefit loss (i.e., the gap between the theoretical maximum and actual benefits) decreased by 26.53 %, from 3.77 to 2.77 million CNY, through maintaining operation decisions within the flexible space during a hypothetical earthquake emergency. This was achieved by adjusting 1.79 % release and 10.71 % hydrogen production power. The proposed method provides implications of jointly utilizing flexibilities of adjustable power sources to decrease economic loss. This research contributes to reducing energy emissions by improving energy use efficiency of power systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 115114"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124008402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schedulable hydropower and hydrogen power provide essential flexibility to mitigate variability of renewables such as wind and photovoltaic power. Previous research has focused on the flexibility of power systems utilizing a single adjustable source (e.g., hydropower). However, joint flexibility of combining adjustable hydropower and hydrogen power has rarely been explored simultaneously. This study aims to establish a joint flexible operation framework for hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power systems. Initially, the forecast uncertainties are quantified regarding the inflow as well as the combined wind and photovoltaic power. Subsequently, a tri-objective optimization model is formulated to maximize operation benefits while enhancing joint flexibility in managing water levels and allocating power to hydrogen production, deriving the flexible operation space. Finally, the operation space's effectiveness is validated by stochastic simulation. Results from a case study using China's Ertan hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power system indicated that the minimum operation benefit derived from the decisions within the operation space decreased with increasing flexibilities of both the water level and power allocation to hydrogen production. The benefit loss (i.e., the gap between the theoretical maximum and actual benefits) decreased by 26.53 %, from 3.77 to 2.77 million CNY, through maintaining operation decisions within the flexible space during a hypothetical earthquake emergency. This was achieved by adjusting 1.79 % release and 10.71 % hydrogen production power. The proposed method provides implications of jointly utilizing flexibilities of adjustable power sources to decrease economic loss. This research contributes to reducing energy emissions by improving energy use efficiency of power systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水氢混合动力系统的灵活运行空间
可调度的水力发电和氢能发电为缓解风能和光伏发电等可再生能源的可变性提供了重要的灵活性。以往的研究侧重于利用单一可调源(如水电)的电力系统的灵活性。然而,很少有人同时探讨可调水电和氢电的联合灵活性。本研究旨在为水电-氢电-风电-光伏发电混合发电系统建立一个联合灵活运行框架。首先,对流入量以及风电和光伏发电量的预测不确定性进行量化。随后,制定了一个三目标优化模型,以实现运行效益最大化,同时提高水位管理和制氢功率分配的联合灵活性,从而得出灵活的运行空间。最后,通过随机模拟验证了运行空间的有效性。利用中国二滩水氢风光互补发电系统进行的案例研究结果表明,随着水位和制氢功率分配灵活性的增加,从运行空间内的决策中获得的最小运行效益也随之降低。在假设的地震紧急情况下,通过将运行决策保持在弹性空间内,效益损失(即理论最大效益与实际效益之间的差距)减少了 26.53%,从 377 万人民币减少到 277 万人民币。这是通过调整 1.79 % 的释放功率和 10.71 % 的制氢功率实现的。所提出的方法提供了共同利用可调节电源的灵活性来减少经济损失的意义。这项研究有助于通过提高电力系统的能源利用效率来减少能源排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Structural optimisation of free-swinging agrivoltaic fences A comprehensive review of grid support services from solar photovoltaic power plants Potential of low-cost materials for biogas purification, a review of recent developments Evaluating China's 2030 carbon peak goal: Post-COVID-19 systematic review Levelized cost of repurposing oil and gas infrastructure for clean energy in the Gulf of Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1