Green hydrogen techno-economic assessments from simulated and measured solar photovoltaic power profiles

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115044
Nicolas Campion , Giulia Montanari , Alessandro Guzzini , Lennard Visser , Alfredo Alcayde
{"title":"Green hydrogen techno-economic assessments from simulated and measured solar photovoltaic power profiles","authors":"Nicolas Campion ,&nbsp;Giulia Montanari ,&nbsp;Alessandro Guzzini ,&nbsp;Lennard Visser ,&nbsp;Alfredo Alcayde","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies estimating the production cost of hydrogen-based fuels, known as e-fuels, often use renewable power profile time series obtained from open-source simulation tools that rely on meteorological reanalysis and satellite data, such as Renewables.ninja or PVGIS. These simulated time series contain errors compared to real on-site measured data, which are reflected in e-fuels cost estimates, plant design, and operational performance, increasing the risk of inaccurate plant design and business models. Focusing on solar-powered e-fuels, this study aims to quantify these errors using high-quality on-site power production data. A state-of-the-art optimization techno-economic model was used to estimate e-fuel production costs by utilizing either simulated or high-quality measured PV power profiles across four sites with different climates. The results indicate that, in cloudy climates, relying on simulated data instead of measured data can lead to an underestimation of the fuel production costs by 36 % for a hydrogen user requiring a constant supply, considering an original error of 1.2 % in the annual average capacity factor. The cost underestimation can reach 25 % for a hydrogen user operating between 40 % and 100 % load and 17.5 % for a fully flexible user. For comparison, cost differences around 20 % could also result from increasing the electrolyser or PV plant costs by around 55 %, which highlights the importance of using high-quality renewable power profiles. To support this, an open-source collaborative repository was developed to facilitate the sharing of measured renewable power profiles and provide tools for both time series analysis and green hydrogen techno-economic assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 115044"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007706","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies estimating the production cost of hydrogen-based fuels, known as e-fuels, often use renewable power profile time series obtained from open-source simulation tools that rely on meteorological reanalysis and satellite data, such as Renewables.ninja or PVGIS. These simulated time series contain errors compared to real on-site measured data, which are reflected in e-fuels cost estimates, plant design, and operational performance, increasing the risk of inaccurate plant design and business models. Focusing on solar-powered e-fuels, this study aims to quantify these errors using high-quality on-site power production data. A state-of-the-art optimization techno-economic model was used to estimate e-fuel production costs by utilizing either simulated or high-quality measured PV power profiles across four sites with different climates. The results indicate that, in cloudy climates, relying on simulated data instead of measured data can lead to an underestimation of the fuel production costs by 36 % for a hydrogen user requiring a constant supply, considering an original error of 1.2 % in the annual average capacity factor. The cost underestimation can reach 25 % for a hydrogen user operating between 40 % and 100 % load and 17.5 % for a fully flexible user. For comparison, cost differences around 20 % could also result from increasing the electrolyser or PV plant costs by around 55 %, which highlights the importance of using high-quality renewable power profiles. To support this, an open-source collaborative repository was developed to facilitate the sharing of measured renewable power profiles and provide tools for both time series analysis and green hydrogen techno-economic assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据模拟和测量的太阳能光伏发电曲线进行绿色氢气技术经济评估
估算氢基燃料(即电子燃料)生产成本的研究通常使用从开源模拟工具(如 Renewables.ninja 或 PVGIS)获得的可再生能源功率曲线时间序列,这些工具依赖于气象再分析和卫星数据。这些模拟时间序列与真实的现场测量数据相比存在误差,这些误差反映在电子燃料的成本估算、发电厂设计和运行性能中,增加了发电厂设计和商业模式不准确的风险。本研究以太阳能发电的电子燃料为重点,旨在利用高质量的现场发电数据量化这些误差。该研究采用了最先进的优化技术经济模型,利用四个不同气候条件下的模拟或高质量测量光伏发电曲线来估算电子燃料的生产成本。结果表明,在多云的气候条件下,对于需要持续供应燃料的氢气用户来说,依靠模拟数据而不是测量数据会导致燃料生产成本被低估 36%,考虑到年平均发电量系数的原始误差为 1.2%。对于在 40% 至 100% 负载之间运行的氢气用户,成本低估可达到 25%,对于完全灵活的用户,成本低估可达到 17.5%。相比之下,如果将电解槽或光伏电站的成本增加约 55%,也会造成约 20% 的成本差异,这凸显了使用高质量可再生能源的重要性。为此,我们开发了一个开源协作资源库,以促进共享测量的可再生能源功率曲线,并为时间序列分析和绿色氢能技术经济评估提供工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Structural optimisation of free-swinging agrivoltaic fences A comprehensive review of grid support services from solar photovoltaic power plants Potential of low-cost materials for biogas purification, a review of recent developments Evaluating China's 2030 carbon peak goal: Post-COVID-19 systematic review Levelized cost of repurposing oil and gas infrastructure for clean energy in the Gulf of Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1