How can consumers without credit history benefit from the use of information processing and machine learning tools by financial institutions?

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103972
Bjorn van Braak, Joerg R. Osterrieder, Marcos R. Machado
{"title":"How can consumers without credit history benefit from the use of information processing and machine learning tools by financial institutions?","authors":"Bjorn van Braak,&nbsp;Joerg R. Osterrieder,&nbsp;Marcos R. Machado","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims to enhance the predictability of creditworthiness among marginalized consumers affected by the widespread adoption of AI frameworks. We utilize ensemble methods to handle the imbalanced dataset used for evaluating the credit risk of consumers with sparse or non-existent credit histories. To promote fairness in the Machine Learning (ML) model, we employed the disparate impact remover—a recognized bias mitigation tool to minimize group bias. Three strategies were employed to tackle dataset imbalance: oversampling, undersampling, and class weight adjustment. Our findings reveal that adjusting the class weight proved most effective in sustaining commendable performance, demonstrating higher accuracy and F-1 scores surpassing 80% in most experiments. While the application of the disparate impact remover might compromise the ML model’s predictive capabilities, our results underscore the necessity of deliberating over the use of potentially bias-sensitive, unprotected features. Recognizing the critical nature of this trade-off for financial decision-makers, we delve into its implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 2","pages":"Article 103972"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324003315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to enhance the predictability of creditworthiness among marginalized consumers affected by the widespread adoption of AI frameworks. We utilize ensemble methods to handle the imbalanced dataset used for evaluating the credit risk of consumers with sparse or non-existent credit histories. To promote fairness in the Machine Learning (ML) model, we employed the disparate impact remover—a recognized bias mitigation tool to minimize group bias. Three strategies were employed to tackle dataset imbalance: oversampling, undersampling, and class weight adjustment. Our findings reveal that adjusting the class weight proved most effective in sustaining commendable performance, demonstrating higher accuracy and F-1 scores surpassing 80% in most experiments. While the application of the disparate impact remover might compromise the ML model’s predictive capabilities, our results underscore the necessity of deliberating over the use of potentially bias-sensitive, unprotected features. Recognizing the critical nature of this trade-off for financial decision-makers, we delve into its implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有信用记录的消费者如何从金融机构使用信息处理和机器学习工具中获益?
本研究旨在提高受人工智能框架广泛应用影响的边缘化消费者的信用可预测性。我们利用集合方法来处理用于评估信用记录稀少或不存在的消费者信用风险的不平衡数据集。为了促进机器学习(ML)模型的公平性,我们采用了差异影响消除器--一种公认的偏见缓解工具,以最大限度地减少群体偏见。我们采用了三种策略来解决数据集失衡问题:过度采样、不足采样和类别权重调整。我们的研究结果表明,调整类权重被证明是最有效的方法,可以保持值得称赞的性能,在大多数实验中,准确率和 F-1 分数都超过了 80%。虽然应用差异影响消除器可能会损害 ML 模型的预测能力,但我们的结果强调了慎重考虑使用潜在的偏差敏感、未受保护特征的必要性。认识到这种权衡对金融决策者的重要性,我们将深入探讨其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
Few-shot multi-hop reasoning via reinforcement learning and path search strategy over temporal knowledge graphs Basis is also explanation: Interpretable Legal Judgment Reasoning prompted by multi-source knowledge Extracting key insights from earnings call transcript via information-theoretic contrastive learning Advancing rule learning in knowledge graphs with structure-aware graph transformer DCIB: Dual contrastive information bottleneck for knowledge-aware recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1