Injecting new insights: How do review sentiment and rating inconsistency shape the helpfulness of airline reviews?

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104088
Yang Liu , Lihua Ma , Yue Dou , Zhen Zhu , Lili Ma , Zhuoxin Liu
{"title":"Injecting new insights: How do review sentiment and rating inconsistency shape the helpfulness of airline reviews?","authors":"Yang Liu ,&nbsp;Lihua Ma ,&nbsp;Yue Dou ,&nbsp;Zhen Zhu ,&nbsp;Lili Ma ,&nbsp;Zhuoxin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating review helpfulness is pivotal in assessing the caliber of airline reviews, instigating lively debates in both academic and practical spheres. This study endeavors to construct a comprehensive conceptual framework grounded in signaling theory, recognizing two factors as indicators shaping the perceived helpfulness of reviews. Empirical analysis was conducted using 82,539 reviews from nine airlines on TripAdvisor. Initially, the study scrutinizes the combined impact of review sentiment and consumer rating, followed by exploring the influence of review inconsistency on review helpfulness. Our experimental results show that most variables achieved a significance of one thousandth. Additionally, we shed light on the moderating effects of several heuristic clues in the model, including text length, seat class, and region. These findings underscore those heuristic clues that collectively influence the helpfulness of reviews. The outcomes of this research can aid airlines in identifying the most helpful reviews, thereby mitigating consumer search costs and empowering reviewers to contribute more valuable insights.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 4","pages":"Article 104088"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325000305","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating review helpfulness is pivotal in assessing the caliber of airline reviews, instigating lively debates in both academic and practical spheres. This study endeavors to construct a comprehensive conceptual framework grounded in signaling theory, recognizing two factors as indicators shaping the perceived helpfulness of reviews. Empirical analysis was conducted using 82,539 reviews from nine airlines on TripAdvisor. Initially, the study scrutinizes the combined impact of review sentiment and consumer rating, followed by exploring the influence of review inconsistency on review helpfulness. Our experimental results show that most variables achieved a significance of one thousandth. Additionally, we shed light on the moderating effects of several heuristic clues in the model, including text length, seat class, and region. These findings underscore those heuristic clues that collectively influence the helpfulness of reviews. The outcomes of this research can aid airlines in identifying the most helpful reviews, thereby mitigating consumer search costs and empowering reviewers to contribute more valuable insights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
Injecting new insights: How do review sentiment and rating inconsistency shape the helpfulness of airline reviews? Exploring hate speech dynamics: The emotional, linguistic, and thematic impact on social media users Leveraging LLMs for action item identification in Urdu meetings: Dataset creation and comparative analysis Deep multi-view subspace clustering via hierarchical diversity optimization of consensus learning TK-RNSP: Efficient Top-K Repetitive Negative Sequential Pattern mining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1