Key design considerations for flood risk pooling facilities at the sub-national level

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Climate Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crm.2024.100671
Kamleshan Pillay
{"title":"Key design considerations for flood risk pooling facilities at the sub-national level","authors":"Kamleshan Pillay","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2024.100671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disaster or catastrophe risk pooling refers to the sharing of risk by entities facing common risk exposure to an individual hazard or set of hazards over a geographical area. Risk pooling members can gain risk diversification benefits such as lower premium costs while facilities based on parametric insurance policies are able to provide timely post-disaster payouts to members. The topic of sub-national catastrophe risk pools is relatively unexplored. Sub-national risk pools are advantageous as they can overcome politicised issues of compromised sovereignty and joint decision-making while enhancing insurance access for smaller, rural sub-national authorities. This research represents a starting point on design considerations for developing a sub-national flood risk pool (SNFRP). The operation of an SNFRP may result in greater spatial correlation. This may affect the financial stability of SNFRPs or diminish the risk diversification benefits over time. The balancing of fully risk-based pricing and affordability is also likely to be a significant challenge for SNFRPs, especially those operating in emerging and developing economies (EMDE). Means-based subsidies can overcome this challenge; however, donor access may be limited. In addition to donor partnerships, SNFRPs require engagements with reinsurers and national government actors to assist with risk transfer and seed capitalisation, respectively. In EMDEs, an SNFRP focused on response and relief will likely be based on parametric insurance policies. Issues such as index selection, geographical basis risk, and data and modelling needs must be carefully considered during the design of flood parametric insurance policies. Geographic basis risk may be amplified in an SNFRP operating at smaller spatial scales as flood events are not restricted to the administrative boundaries of sub-national authorities. Other issues that could influence the implementation of a sub-national facility include gaining political buy-in; access to reinsurance markets; and risk reduction incentivisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100671"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disaster or catastrophe risk pooling refers to the sharing of risk by entities facing common risk exposure to an individual hazard or set of hazards over a geographical area. Risk pooling members can gain risk diversification benefits such as lower premium costs while facilities based on parametric insurance policies are able to provide timely post-disaster payouts to members. The topic of sub-national catastrophe risk pools is relatively unexplored. Sub-national risk pools are advantageous as they can overcome politicised issues of compromised sovereignty and joint decision-making while enhancing insurance access for smaller, rural sub-national authorities. This research represents a starting point on design considerations for developing a sub-national flood risk pool (SNFRP). The operation of an SNFRP may result in greater spatial correlation. This may affect the financial stability of SNFRPs or diminish the risk diversification benefits over time. The balancing of fully risk-based pricing and affordability is also likely to be a significant challenge for SNFRPs, especially those operating in emerging and developing economies (EMDE). Means-based subsidies can overcome this challenge; however, donor access may be limited. In addition to donor partnerships, SNFRPs require engagements with reinsurers and national government actors to assist with risk transfer and seed capitalisation, respectively. In EMDEs, an SNFRP focused on response and relief will likely be based on parametric insurance policies. Issues such as index selection, geographical basis risk, and data and modelling needs must be carefully considered during the design of flood parametric insurance policies. Geographic basis risk may be amplified in an SNFRP operating at smaller spatial scales as flood events are not restricted to the administrative boundaries of sub-national authorities. Other issues that could influence the implementation of a sub-national facility include gaining political buy-in; access to reinsurance markets; and risk reduction incentivisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家以下各级洪水风险汇集设施的主要设计考虑因素
灾害或巨灾风险共担是指在一个地理区域内,面临单个灾害或一组灾害的共同风险的实体分担风险。风险池成员可以获得风险分散的好处,如降低保费成本,而基于参数保单的设施则能够向成员提供及时的灾后赔付。次国家级巨灾风险池这一主题相对来说还没有得到探讨。国家以下各级风险池的优势在于,它们可以克服主权受损和联合决策等政治问题,同时提高规模较小的农村国家以下各级政府的保险可及性。本研究为开发国家以下各级洪水风险池 (SNFRP) 的设计考虑因素提供了一个起点。国家以下各级洪水风险池的运作可能会导致更大的空间相关性。这可能会影响国家以下洪水风险池的财务稳定性,或随着时间的推移降低风险分散的效益。平衡完全基于风险的定价和可负担性也可能是 SNFRP 面临的一个重大挑战,特别是那些在新兴和发展中经济体(EMDE)运营的 SNFRP。以经济手段为基础的补贴可以克服这一挑战;但是,捐助方可能会受到限制。除捐助方伙伴关系外,SNFRP 还需要与再保险公司和国家政府行为者合作,分别协助风险转移和种子资本化。在欧洲、中东和非洲地区,以应对和救援为重点的 SNFRP 可能会以参数保险单为基础。在设计洪水参数保险政策时,必须仔细考虑指数选择、地理基础风险以及数据和建模需求等问题。由于洪水事件并不局限于国家以下各级当局的行政边界,因此在较小空间范围内运作的国家洪水灾害预警系统(SNFRP)中,地理基础风险可能会被放大。可能影响国家以下各级设施实施的其他问题包括:获得政治支持;进入再保险市场;以及降低风险的激励措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Climate Risk Management
Climate Risk Management Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term. The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.
期刊最新文献
Risk Governance of Climate-Related Hazards in Longyearbyen, Svalbard: A Review of Risk Governance Approaches and Knowledge Gaps Co-designing a just resilience balance scorecard with experts in islands and coastal cities Gender-based vulnerability and adaptive capacity in the disaster-prone coastal areas from an intersectionality perspective The impact of livelihood capitals on farmers’ adoption of climate-smart agriculture practices: Evidence from rice production in the Jianghan Plain, China Economic valuation of climate induced losses to aquaculture for evaluating climate information services in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1