Requiem for Argentine mammals: A spatial framework for mapping extinction risk

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126759
Gabriel M. Martin , Baltazar González , Federico Brook , Melina Zuliani , Agustín M. Abba , Sebastián Cirignoli , Soledad de Bustos , M.Mónica Díaz , Isabel Gómez Villafañe , Martín Kowalewski , Matías S. Mora , Agustina Ojeda , Silvana Peker , Javier A. Pereira , Mariella Superina , Pablo Teta , Diego Varela , Adrian Monjeau
{"title":"Requiem for Argentine mammals: A spatial framework for mapping extinction risk","authors":"Gabriel M. Martin ,&nbsp;Baltazar González ,&nbsp;Federico Brook ,&nbsp;Melina Zuliani ,&nbsp;Agustín M. Abba ,&nbsp;Sebastián Cirignoli ,&nbsp;Soledad de Bustos ,&nbsp;M.Mónica Díaz ,&nbsp;Isabel Gómez Villafañe ,&nbsp;Martín Kowalewski ,&nbsp;Matías S. Mora ,&nbsp;Agustina Ojeda ,&nbsp;Silvana Peker ,&nbsp;Javier A. Pereira ,&nbsp;Mariella Superina ,&nbsp;Pablo Teta ,&nbsp;Diego Varela ,&nbsp;Adrian Monjeau","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this work was to analyze the species richness and conservation status of terrestrial mammals in Argentina in relation to protected areas and human footprint intensity using a spatially explicit metric. We calculated the conservation value per species integrating taxonomic singularity, chorology and national conservation category. We superimposed conservation values per pixel in 25 km<sup>2</sup> grids with the protected areas of the country under different types of administration and management defined in this study and with the human footprint. Richness ranged from 1 to 93 species per pixel, and conservation values from 3 to 589 per pixel. Pixels with the highest richness and high conservation values represented 0.5 % and 18.8 % of the studied area, respectively. High pixel conservation values had 2.5 % of their area protected. The protected areas of Argentina covered 8.7 % of the total area of distribution of mammals. Areas under national management (e.g., national parks) conserved only 1.8 %, while the remainder corresponded to areas under sub-national jurisdiction (e.g., provincial reserves) and under resource management. Most taxa had less than 10 % of their range within protected areas. The high, medium and low human footprint affected 12 %, 33.2 % and 53.3 % of the studied area, respectively. The high footprint impacted on 1.2 % to 14.5 % of the distribution of the different orders of mammals, with Lagomorpha and Pilosa being the most affected. Areas of high conservation value were poorly represented in protected areas, and were impacted by a high human footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 126759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124002085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this work was to analyze the species richness and conservation status of terrestrial mammals in Argentina in relation to protected areas and human footprint intensity using a spatially explicit metric. We calculated the conservation value per species integrating taxonomic singularity, chorology and national conservation category. We superimposed conservation values per pixel in 25 km2 grids with the protected areas of the country under different types of administration and management defined in this study and with the human footprint. Richness ranged from 1 to 93 species per pixel, and conservation values from 3 to 589 per pixel. Pixels with the highest richness and high conservation values represented 0.5 % and 18.8 % of the studied area, respectively. High pixel conservation values had 2.5 % of their area protected. The protected areas of Argentina covered 8.7 % of the total area of distribution of mammals. Areas under national management (e.g., national parks) conserved only 1.8 %, while the remainder corresponded to areas under sub-national jurisdiction (e.g., provincial reserves) and under resource management. Most taxa had less than 10 % of their range within protected areas. The high, medium and low human footprint affected 12 %, 33.2 % and 53.3 % of the studied area, respectively. The high footprint impacted on 1.2 % to 14.5 % of the distribution of the different orders of mammals, with Lagomorpha and Pilosa being the most affected. Areas of high conservation value were poorly represented in protected areas, and were impacted by a high human footprint.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷哺乳动物的安魂曲:绘制灭绝风险地图的空间框架
这项工作的目的是利用空间明确度量方法,分析阿根廷陆生哺乳动物的物种丰富度和保护状况与保护区和人类足迹强度的关系。我们计算了每个物种的保护价值,其中综合了分类学单一性、群落学和国家保护类别。我们将 25 平方公里网格中每个像素的保护价值与本研究中定义的不同行政和管理类型的国家保护区以及人类足迹进行了叠加。每个像素的物种丰富度从 1 到 93 不等,保护价值从 3 到 589 不等。物种丰富度最高和保护价值最高的像素分别占研究区域的 0.5% 和 18.8%。保护价值高的像素有 2.5% 的面积受到保护。阿根廷的保护区占哺乳动物分布总面积的 8.7%。由国家管理的区域(如国家公园)只保护了1.8%的面积,其余的则属于国家以下管辖区域(如省级保护区)和资源管理区域。大多数分类群在保护区内的分布面积不足 10%。高、中、低人类足迹分别影响了研究区域的 12%、33.2% 和 53.3%。高人类足迹影响了1.2%到14.5%的哺乳动物各目分布区,其中以Lagomorpha和Pilosa影响最大。具有较高保护价值的地区在保护区中的比例较低,并且受到人类足迹较多的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Surviving the Tide: Assessing Guiana dolphin persistence amidst growing threats in a protected estuary in South-eastern Brazil” [J. Nature Conserv. 82 (2024) 126713] From virtue to sin: Is the installation of bat boxes an effective conservation measure or a potential pitfall for vulnerable bat species? Paying for green tide management or participating in cleanup activities? Testing and controlling for payment vehicle bias in the valuation of ecological damage caused by green tides Predicting climate driven habitat shifts for the Egyptian vulture in Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1