What makes students tick? Exploring factors that affect learner motivations and challenges when engaging with optional library workshops on data literacy

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102983
Michelle Kelly Schultz
{"title":"What makes students tick? Exploring factors that affect learner motivations and challenges when engaging with optional library workshops on data literacy","authors":"Michelle Kelly Schultz","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optional data literacy library workshops often struggle to achieve consistent high enrollment and attendance. In seeking strategies to mitigate these challenges, this qualitative study attempted to gain a better understanding of learner motivations and challenges when enrolling and attending optional data literacy instruction offered by a data library at a large university. Nineteen graduate students were interviewed. This study found four factors involved in motivating graduate students to enroll and attend optional library data literacy workshops. These factors, in the form of questions that graduate students would ask about the workshops, were: does the workshop address my need; does the workshop fit into my schedule; does the workshop satisfy my learning preferences; and are there health, emotional, or social aspects that could affect my workshop attendance. Based on these findings, several strategies to improve motivation and attendance were suggested, such as providing workshops at time of need, holding regular repeated sessions, presenting a mix of online and in-person offerings, and making workshops part of a social or networking event.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 102983"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324001447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optional data literacy library workshops often struggle to achieve consistent high enrollment and attendance. In seeking strategies to mitigate these challenges, this qualitative study attempted to gain a better understanding of learner motivations and challenges when enrolling and attending optional data literacy instruction offered by a data library at a large university. Nineteen graduate students were interviewed. This study found four factors involved in motivating graduate students to enroll and attend optional library data literacy workshops. These factors, in the form of questions that graduate students would ask about the workshops, were: does the workshop address my need; does the workshop fit into my schedule; does the workshop satisfy my learning preferences; and are there health, emotional, or social aspects that could affect my workshop attendance. Based on these findings, several strategies to improve motivation and attendance were suggested, such as providing workshops at time of need, holding regular repeated sessions, presenting a mix of online and in-person offerings, and making workshops part of a social or networking event.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么让学生心动?探索影响学习者参加图书馆数据素养选修讲习班的动机和挑战的因素
可选的数据扫盲图书馆研讨会往往难以获得稳定的高注册率和出席率。为了寻求缓解这些挑战的策略,本定性研究试图更好地了解学习者在报名和参加由一所大型大学的数据图书馆提供的可选数据扫盲课程时所面临的动机和挑战。19 名研究生接受了访谈。本研究发现了促使研究生报名并参加图书馆数据扫盲选修课的四个因素。这些因素以研究生会问的问题的形式出现,分别是:培训班是否能满足我的需求;培训班是否符合我的时间安排;培训班是否能满足我的学习偏好;以及是否有健康、情感或社会方面的因素会影响我参加培训班。根据这些调查结果,提出了几项提高学习动机和出席率的策略,如在有需要的时候举办研修班、定期重复举办研修班、混合提供在线和面对面的研修班,以及将研修班作为社交或网络活动的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Early electronic journals: A preservation survey Beyond the desk: Enhancing user satisfaction with contactless services in South Korean academic libraries An examination of students' needs from 2019 to 2023: Using talk-back boards for library programming Empowering future researchers: Designing an information literacy-centric introductory composition course What makes students tick? Exploring factors that affect learner motivations and challenges when engaging with optional library workshops on data literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1