Self-comparison versus social-comparison: The impact of imperfection on executive function in perfectionists

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112965
Yan Zhou , Ye Yang , Haiyang Jiang , Cheng Guo
{"title":"Self-comparison versus social-comparison: The impact of imperfection on executive function in perfectionists","authors":"Yan Zhou ,&nbsp;Ye Yang ,&nbsp;Haiyang Jiang ,&nbsp;Cheng Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Perfectionism is closely linked to high academic achievement, yet it is uncertain whether and how this advantage is manifested in cognitive functioning. We aimed to investigate whether the subtypes of perfectionists' executive functions (EF) are more susceptible to self-comparison or social-comparison. We recruited 75 students and provided them with sequential failure feedback based on self-comparison or social-comparison, and their performance on the three components of EF was subsequently recorded. Results indicated that for the perfectionists, receiving feedback that their performance was inferior to others served as a stronger facilitator of EF than when they performed worse than their own goals. Moreover, individual differences were observed. The Mixed-perfectionism group, i.e., those high in both Perfectionism striving (PS) and Perfectionism concern (PC), were more sensitive to social-comparison feedback, whereas those in the Pure PS group were more sensitive to self-comparison feedback. Additionally, the extent of these effects varied across the three components of EF. Strategies for maximizing the facilitative effects of feedback on cognition based on individual differences are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 112965"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perfectionism is closely linked to high academic achievement, yet it is uncertain whether and how this advantage is manifested in cognitive functioning. We aimed to investigate whether the subtypes of perfectionists' executive functions (EF) are more susceptible to self-comparison or social-comparison. We recruited 75 students and provided them with sequential failure feedback based on self-comparison or social-comparison, and their performance on the three components of EF was subsequently recorded. Results indicated that for the perfectionists, receiving feedback that their performance was inferior to others served as a stronger facilitator of EF than when they performed worse than their own goals. Moreover, individual differences were observed. The Mixed-perfectionism group, i.e., those high in both Perfectionism striving (PS) and Perfectionism concern (PC), were more sensitive to social-comparison feedback, whereas those in the Pure PS group were more sensitive to self-comparison feedback. Additionally, the extent of these effects varied across the three components of EF. Strategies for maximizing the facilitative effects of feedback on cognition based on individual differences are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我比较与社会比较:不完美对完美主义者执行功能的影响
完美主义与高学业成绩密切相关,但这种优势是否以及如何体现在认知功能上,目前尚不确定。我们旨在研究完美主义者的执行功能(EF)亚型是否更容易受到自我比较或社会比较的影响。我们招募了75名学生,向他们提供了基于自我比较或社会比较的连续失败反馈,随后记录了他们在执行功能三个组成部分上的表现。结果表明,对于完美主义者来说,当他们收到的反馈表明他们的表现不如他人时,比他们的表现不如自己的目标时更能促进他们的EF。此外,研究还发现了个体差异。混合完美主义组,即同时具有完美主义努力(PS)和完美主义关注(PC)的人,对社会比较反馈更敏感,而纯粹完美主义组的人对自我比较反馈更敏感。此外,这些影响的程度在 EF 的三个组成部分中各不相同。本文讨论了如何根据个体差异最大限度地发挥反馈对认知的促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge structure of personality and individual differences: A 43 year's retrospective of the journal using bibliometric analysis Examining the longitudinal relationship between family conflict and bullying in Chinese children: The serial mediating roles of personal mastery and social anxiety How and when perceived COVID-19 crisis disruption triggers employee work withdrawal behavior: The role of perceived control and trait optimism To avoid disconnection or approach connection: Loneliness predicts social robot anthropomorphism via different social motivations in the UK and China Personality profiles in SAPA data: An exploratory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1