Jomana W. Alsulaiman , Abdallah Alzoubi , Ahmad Alrawashdeh , Arwa M. Al-Dekah , Sara Abubaker , Wajdi Amayreh , Waleed M. Sweileh , Hamed M. Alzoubi , Khalid A. Kheirallah
{"title":"Mapping trends and hotspots of research on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research","authors":"Jomana W. Alsulaiman , Abdallah Alzoubi , Ahmad Alrawashdeh , Arwa M. Al-Dekah , Sara Abubaker , Wajdi Amayreh , Waleed M. Sweileh , Hamed M. Alzoubi , Khalid A. Kheirallah","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With an ever growing and expanding body of literature on the newly developed vaccines against the COVID-19, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive analysis of the current state of research on vaccine effectiveness (VE). This study conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to critically examine the productivity and impact of retrieved publications on COVID-19 VE and to predict the future directions of research in the field.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The global literature on COVID-19 VE from 2021 to 2024 was extracted from the VIEW-hub website. Using bibliometric analysis tools, specifically Microsoft Excel, the R package \"bibliometrix, biblioshiny\" and VOSviewer, we analyzed publications for trends in productivity, citations, and global collaboration. Key metrics assessed include publication and citation trends, influential authors, collaborative networks, and thematic evolution, offering a comprehensive view of the research landscape on COVID-19 VE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 490 publications were authored by 5031 authors from 934 institutions and 78 countries and published in 119 journals. Most retrieved publications were original articles (99.6 %). The United States was the most productive country with 205 publications (41.8 %). Global research collaborations were mainly within developed countries. Analysis of the thematic evolution of the field illustrated changing research focus over three distinct time clusters. Throughout 2021, studies were focused on outlining infection prevention and control measures, as well as examining the efficacy of novel mRNA vaccines. In 2022, the linchpin of research was shifted towards dissecting the epidemiological correlates of the pandemic in light of the widespread use of vaccines. The final cluster showed special emphasis on the new variants of COVID-19 and the long-term outcomes of vaccines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study identified geopolitical disparities and weak engagement from developing countries in the ongoing efforts regarding COVID-19 VE. This study can inform researchers, policymakers, and funding agencies as they assess ongoing research and future directions in COVID-19 VE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"Article 102597"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034124003319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
With an ever growing and expanding body of literature on the newly developed vaccines against the COVID-19, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive analysis of the current state of research on vaccine effectiveness (VE). This study conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to critically examine the productivity and impact of retrieved publications on COVID-19 VE and to predict the future directions of research in the field.
Methods
The global literature on COVID-19 VE from 2021 to 2024 was extracted from the VIEW-hub website. Using bibliometric analysis tools, specifically Microsoft Excel, the R package "bibliometrix, biblioshiny" and VOSviewer, we analyzed publications for trends in productivity, citations, and global collaboration. Key metrics assessed include publication and citation trends, influential authors, collaborative networks, and thematic evolution, offering a comprehensive view of the research landscape on COVID-19 VE.
Results
A total of 490 publications were authored by 5031 authors from 934 institutions and 78 countries and published in 119 journals. Most retrieved publications were original articles (99.6 %). The United States was the most productive country with 205 publications (41.8 %). Global research collaborations were mainly within developed countries. Analysis of the thematic evolution of the field illustrated changing research focus over three distinct time clusters. Throughout 2021, studies were focused on outlining infection prevention and control measures, as well as examining the efficacy of novel mRNA vaccines. In 2022, the linchpin of research was shifted towards dissecting the epidemiological correlates of the pandemic in light of the widespread use of vaccines. The final cluster showed special emphasis on the new variants of COVID-19 and the long-term outcomes of vaccines.
Conclusion
Our study identified geopolitical disparities and weak engagement from developing countries in the ongoing efforts regarding COVID-19 VE. This study can inform researchers, policymakers, and funding agencies as they assess ongoing research and future directions in COVID-19 VE.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other.
The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners.
It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
