A systematic review of library services platforms research and research agenda

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library & Information Science Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101325
Ze Liu , Bo Shao
{"title":"A systematic review of library services platforms research and research agenda","authors":"Ze Liu ,&nbsp;Bo Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With changes in technology and user behavior, library services platforms (LSPs) have emerged and evolved rapidly, as has research on LSPs. The systematic review involved the analysis of 22 studies drawn from 4726 records, with the objective of providing empirical insights into the functions and roles of LSPs. System types, vendors, research methods, participants, roles, and challenges in LSPs research were identified. The results show that the existing studies mainly involve three system types: Alma, Sierra, and WMS, and their vendors are Ex Libris, OCLC, and Innovative. LSPs involve mainly two main types of roles: management-related roles and services-related roles. Meanwhile, libraries face several challenges in the implementation of the LSPs, caused by a huge amount of data, insufficient training, a lack of human resources, and a limited budget. The findings highlight opportunities for future research, including enriching research methodologies and expanding the types of users and systems investigated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"46 4","pages":"Article 101325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library & Information Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074081882400046X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With changes in technology and user behavior, library services platforms (LSPs) have emerged and evolved rapidly, as has research on LSPs. The systematic review involved the analysis of 22 studies drawn from 4726 records, with the objective of providing empirical insights into the functions and roles of LSPs. System types, vendors, research methods, participants, roles, and challenges in LSPs research were identified. The results show that the existing studies mainly involve three system types: Alma, Sierra, and WMS, and their vendors are Ex Libris, OCLC, and Innovative. LSPs involve mainly two main types of roles: management-related roles and services-related roles. Meanwhile, libraries face several challenges in the implementation of the LSPs, caused by a huge amount of data, insufficient training, a lack of human resources, and a limited budget. The findings highlight opportunities for future research, including enriching research methodologies and expanding the types of users and systems investigated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书馆服务平台研究和研究议程系统回顾
随着技术和用户行为的变化,图书馆服务平台(LSP)不断涌现并迅速发展,有关 LSP 的研究也是如此。本次系统性综述分析了来自 4726 条记录的 22 项研究,旨在提供有关 LSP 功能和作用的经验性见解。研究确定了系统类型、供应商、研究方法、参与者、角色和 LSP 研究中的挑战。结果显示,现有研究主要涉及三种系统类型:其供应商分别是 Ex Libris、OCLC 和 Innovative。LSP 主要涉及两大类角色:与管理相关的角色和与服务相关的角色。同时,图书馆在实施 LSP 的过程中面临着数据量巨大、培训不足、人力资源缺乏和预算有限等挑战。研究结果强调了未来研究的机遇,包括丰富研究方法和扩大调查的用户和系统类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library & Information Science Research
Library & Information Science Research INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Library & Information Science Research, a cross-disciplinary and refereed journal, focuses on the research process in library and information science as well as research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance. All papers are subject to a double-blind reviewing process.
期刊最新文献
The user experience of university library: A text mining analysis of a Q&A platform in China Data literacy in flux: Perspectives of community college librarians on evolving educational demands and library capacities Interpretable analysis of public library service outcomes based on ensemble learning models: Data study from China (2007–2021) A systematic review of library services platforms research and research agenda Factors influencing the effect of proxy health information seeking behavior: A grounded theory exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1