Library & Information Science Research最新文献

Guest editorial: Library and information science research: Present, past, future 客座评论：图书馆情报学研究：现在、过去、未来

IF 2.3 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101384

Betsy Van der Veer Martens

引用次数: 0

Standing on the shoulders of giants: A review of reviews on health information behavior 站在巨人的肩膀上：健康信息行为综述

IF 2.3 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101380

Xiaoqian Zhang, Yueyan Zhao, Feng Yang

Literature reviews provide comprehensive overviews of research on a given topic, serving as a foundation for future studies and uncovering new insights by situating findings within a broader context. However, little research has examined these reviews as a collective body. The landscape of review studies on health information behavior and how they have evolved over time was explored. To achieve this, a review of reviews was conducted using a sample of 91 review studies identified through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. The findings reveal that while some researchers are well-integrated into co-authorship networks, most authors tend to work independently when producing review studies. These reviews are widely dispersed across journals rather than concentrated in a few core outlets. Systematic reviews, purpose-specific reviews, and traditional reviews are the most commonly used types. These findings have practical implications for researchers aiming to produce high-quality review studies, and for journal editors, funding agencies, and policymakers seeking to trace and support the development of this field.

文献综述提供了对给定主题的研究的全面概述，作为未来研究的基础，并通过将研究结果置于更广泛的背景下发现新的见解。然而，很少有研究将这些评论作为一个整体进行检验。对健康信息行为及其如何随着时间的推移而演变的审查研究的景观进行了探索。为了实现这一目标，通过系统评价和荟萃分析流程图优选报告项目，对91项综述研究进行了综述。研究结果表明，虽然一些研究人员很好地融入了合作作者网络，但大多数作者在进行综述研究时倾向于独立工作。这些评论广泛分布在不同的期刊上，而不是集中在几个核心期刊上。系统评审、特定目的评审和传统评审是最常用的类型。这些发现对旨在产生高质量综述研究的研究人员、对寻求追踪和支持这一领域发展的期刊编辑、资助机构和政策制定者具有实际意义。

{"title":"Standing on the shoulders of giants: A review of reviews on health information behavior","authors":"Xiaoqian Zhang, Yueyan Zhao, Feng Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101380","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101380","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Literature reviews provide comprehensive overviews of research on a given topic, serving as a foundation for future studies and uncovering new insights by situating findings within a broader context. However, little research has examined these reviews as a collective body. The landscape of review studies on health information behavior and how they have evolved over time was explored. To achieve this, a review of reviews was conducted using a sample of 91 review studies identified through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. The findings reveal that while some researchers are well-integrated into co-authorship networks, most authors tend to work independently when producing review studies. These reviews are widely dispersed across journals rather than concentrated in a few core outlets. Systematic reviews, purpose-specific reviews, and traditional reviews are the most commonly used types. These findings have practical implications for researchers aiming to produce high-quality review studies, and for journal editors, funding agencies, and policymakers seeking to trace and support the development of this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Are you ready? An investigation of factors affecting artificial intelligence readiness of college students 你准备好了吗？大学生人工智能准备程度影响因素调查

IF 2.3 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101381

Yuwen Hua, Honglei Lia Sun

Artificial Intelligence (AI) brings substantial convenience to individuals' daily lives and redefines the knowledge and skills college students need. Enhancing the AI readiness (AIR) of college students will help them adapt to the advent of the AI era as early as possible. Little is known about college students' AIR and it is unclear what factors influence college students' AIR. Inspired by the social cognitive theory, a theoretical framework, that is “Environment - Cognition - AIR”, is proposed to examine the factors affecting college students' AIR and uncover the mechanisms that underlie the effect of these factors on college students' AIR. Five hundred sixty-eight college students were recruited to participate in the questionnaire survey. The partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to validate the theoretical framework. The results show that the college environmental factors (i.e., social support, teaching condition, and teaching activity) influence college students' AIR through cognitive factors (i.e., perceived relevance and self-efficacy). Perceived relevance and self-efficacy are mediating variables. These findings push the boundaries of technology readiness and provide empirical evidence for improving college students' AIR and facilitating AI education in higher education institutions.

人工智能（AI）为个人的日常生活带来了极大的便利，并重新定义了大学生所需的知识和技能。提高大学生的人工智能准备度（AIR）将有助于他们尽早适应人工智能时代的到来。我们对大学生的空气质量知之甚少，影响大学生空气质量的因素也不清楚。在社会认知理论的启发下，提出了“环境-认知-空气”的理论框架来考察大学生空气的影响因素，并揭示这些因素对大学生空气的影响机制。本研究共招募568名大学生参与问卷调查。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型（PLS-SEM）对理论框架进行了验证。结果表明，大学环境因素（即社会支持、教学条件和教学活动）通过认知因素（即感知关联和自我效能感）影响大学生的AIR。感知相关性和自我效能感是中介变量。这些发现推动了技术准备的界限，并为改善大学生的AIR和促进高等教育机构的人工智能教育提供了经验证据。

{"title":"Are you ready? An investigation of factors affecting artificial intelligence readiness of college students","authors":"Yuwen Hua, Honglei Lia Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101381","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101381","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial Intelligence (AI) brings substantial convenience to individuals' daily lives and redefines the knowledge and skills college students need. Enhancing the AI readiness (AIR) of college students will help them adapt to the advent of the AI era as early as possible. Little is known about college students' AIR and it is unclear what factors influence college students' AIR. Inspired by the social cognitive theory, a theoretical framework, that is “Environment - Cognition - AIR”, is proposed to examine the factors affecting college students' AIR and uncover the mechanisms that underlie the effect of these factors on college students' AIR. Five hundred sixty-eight college students were recruited to participate in the questionnaire survey. The partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to validate the theoretical framework. The results show that the college environmental factors (i.e., social support, teaching condition, and teaching activity) influence college students' AIR through cognitive factors (i.e., perceived relevance and self-efficacy). Perceived relevance and self-efficacy are mediating variables. These findings push the boundaries of technology readiness and provide empirical evidence for improving college students' AIR and facilitating AI education in higher education institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The innovative momentum of knowledge sharing: How does strengthening community libraries boost patent output? 知识共享的创新动力：加强社区图书馆如何促进专利产出？

IF 2.3 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101383

Zhouhong Wang , Sitian Qiu , Tongshu Wu , Yue Bian , Peng Xiao

The community library has demonstrated potential in supporting innovation. The causal relationship between library services and innovation, focusing on how community libraries promote knowledge dissemination and increase patent output, was investigated. Using the Community Library Enhancement Program in a Chinese province as a quasi-natural experiment, the difference-in-differences method was applied to examine the effect on patent publications in 122 counties. The results demonstrate that the community libraries have significantly increased patent output, particularly in regions with lower innovation performance, by strengthening cooperative relationships with the higher-level libraries. The circulation of the libraries increased significantly during the policy implementation, yet the activities held did not. This contrast indicates the limitations in community libraries in providing opportunities for sharing tacit knowledge and promoting deeper innovation activities. The role of library services in fostering innovation and the need for community libraries to implement more inspiring and intellectually stimulating interactive library activities to enhance tacit knowledge sharing were substantiated, thereby maximizing their contribution to innovation.

社区图书馆在支持创新方面已经显示出潜力。以社区图书馆促进知识传播和增加专利产出为重点，研究了图书馆服务与创新的因果关系。以中国某省的社区图书馆加强计划为准自然实验，采用差异中的差异方法考察了该计划对122个县的专利出版物的影响。结果表明，社区图书馆通过加强与上级图书馆的合作关系，显著提高了专利产出，特别是在创新绩效较低的地区。政策实施期间，图书馆的流通量明显增加，但举办的活动却没有增加。这种对比表明了社区图书馆在提供隐性知识共享机会和促进更深层次创新活动方面的局限性。图书馆服务在促进创新方面的作用，以及社区图书馆需要实施更多鼓舞人心和激发智力的互动图书馆活动，以加强隐性知识共享，从而最大限度地发挥其对创新的贡献。

{"title":"The innovative momentum of knowledge sharing: How does strengthening community libraries boost patent output?","authors":"Zhouhong Wang , Sitian Qiu , Tongshu Wu , Yue Bian , Peng Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101383","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101383","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The community library has demonstrated potential in supporting innovation. The causal relationship between library services and innovation, focusin<u>g</u> on how community libraries promote knowledge dissemination and increase patent output, was investigated. Using the Community Library Enhancement Program in a Chinese province as a quasi-natural experiment, the difference-in-differences method was applied to examine the effect on patent publications in 122 counties. The results demonstrate that the community libraries have significantly increased patent output, particularly in regions with lower innovation performance, by strengthening cooperative relationships with the higher-level libraries. The circulation of the libraries increased significantly during the policy implementation, yet the activities held did not. This contrast indicates the limitations in community libraries in providing opportunities for sharing tacit knowledge and promoting deeper innovation activities. The role of library services in fostering innovation and the need for community libraries to implement more inspiring and intellectually stimulating interactive library activities to enhance tacit knowledge sharing were substantiated, thereby maximizing their contribution to innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

TikTok as information space: A scoping review of information behavior on TikTok TikTok作为信息空间：对TikTok上信息行为的范围审查

IF 2.3 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101379

Heather L. O'Brien, Nilou Davoudi, Melissa Nelson

TikTok, one of the fastest growing social networking apps globally, has generated a lot of scholarly and media attention in recent years. To surface the extent to which information behavior (IB) has been investigated on TikTok, a scoping review of 49 journal and conference papers was conducted to examine characteristics of the literature and coverage of IB phenomena. Papers related to TikTok and IB increased between 2020 and 2024, but publications in LIS venues were limited. The majority of authors were United States based, which may have implications for research generalizability. The surveyed papers featured a variety of methodologies, namely user interviews and surveys, and content analysis of videos. Use of LIS models, theories, and concepts was limited; while this reflects the multidisciplinary nature of TikTok research, it also meant that aspects of IB, such as re-finding, avoidance, and discovery, were underexplored and undertheorized. TikTok's algorithmic recommendation system and design features influenced information seeking and retrieval, discovery, evaluation, and sharing on the platform, but more empirical studies are needed to understand TikTok's role as an information space and its integration in the broader information behavior ecosystem.

TikTok是全球增长最快的社交网络应用之一，近年来引起了很多学术和媒体的关注。为了揭示TikTok上信息行为（IB）的研究程度，我们对49篇期刊和会议论文进行了范围审查，以检查文献的特征和IB现象的覆盖范围。2020年至2024年间，与TikTok和IB相关的论文有所增加，但在美国发表的论文数量有限。大多数作者来自美国，这可能对研究的普遍性有影响。调查论文采用了多种方法，即用户访谈和调查，以及视频内容分析。LIS模型、理论和概念的使用受到限制；虽然这反映了TikTok研究的多学科性质，但这也意味着IB的各个方面，如重新发现、回避和发现，都没有得到充分的探索和理论化。TikTok的算法推荐系统和设计特征影响了平台上的信息搜索和检索、发现、评估和分享，但需要更多的实证研究来理解TikTok作为一个信息空间的作用，以及它在更广泛的信息行为生态系统中的整合。

{"title":"TikTok as information space: A scoping review of information behavior on TikTok","authors":"Heather L. O'Brien, Nilou Davoudi, Melissa Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101379","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101379","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>TikTok, one of the fastest growing social networking apps globally, has generated a lot of scholarly and media attention in recent years. To surface the extent to which information behavior (IB) has been investigated on TikTok, a scoping review of 49 journal and conference papers was conducted to examine characteristics of the literature and coverage of IB phenomena. Papers related to TikTok and IB increased between 2020 and 2024, but publications in LIS venues were limited. The majority of authors were United States based, which may have implications for research generalizability. The surveyed papers featured a variety of methodologies, namely user interviews and surveys, and content analysis of videos. Use of LIS models, theories, and concepts was limited; while this reflects the multidisciplinary nature of TikTok research, it also meant that aspects of IB, such as re-finding, avoidance, and discovery, were underexplored and undertheorized. TikTok's algorithmic recommendation system and design features influenced information seeking and retrieval, discovery, evaluation, and sharing on the platform, but more empirical studies are needed to understand TikTok's role as an information space and its integration in the broader information behavior ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145340476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Motivating STEM and non-STEM knowledge co-creation through combinations of textual cues 通过文本线索的组合激励STEM和非STEM知识的共同创造

IF 2.3 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101382

Qian Wu , Chei Sian Lee , Dion Hoe-Lian Goh

Online academic Q&A platforms foster collaborative knowledge creation through textual cues such as emotional expressiveness and politeness. While prior research focused on individual cues, people naturally interpret combinations of textual cues (CTCs), which remain understudied. This experiment examines how CTCs influence active participation (knowledge co-creation) and reduce passive observation (lurking) across STEM and non-STEM topics. A 2 × 3 factorial design with 109 university students tested two topic types and three CTCs associated with gain, hedonic, and normative motivations. Results show that aligning textual cues with user motivations boosts participation. Complex questions featuring hedonic and normative cues prompted more engagement than neutral ones. Gain-framed cues were more effective in STEM discussions, while hedonic and normative cues performed better in non-STEM contexts. These findings highlight how CTCs shape user behavior differently across disciplines. The insights can guide the design of more engaging prompts, enabling platform managers to foster sustainable, interactive knowledge-sharing communities.

在线学术问答平台通过文本线索（如情感表达和礼貌）促进协作知识创造。虽然先前的研究侧重于单个线索，但人们自然会解释文本线索的组合（ctc），这一点仍未得到充分研究。本实验探讨了ctc如何影响STEM和非STEM主题的积极参与（知识共同创造）和减少被动观察（潜伏）。对109名大学生进行了2 × 3因子设计，测试了两种主题类型和三种与增益、享乐和规范动机相关的CTCs。结果表明，将文本提示与用户动机结合起来可以提高参与度。具有享乐和规范线索的复杂问题比中性问题更能吸引人。收益框架线索在STEM讨论中更有效，而享乐和规范线索在非STEM环境中表现更好。这些发现强调了ctc如何在不同学科中塑造不同的用户行为。这些见解可以指导设计更具吸引力的提示，使平台管理者能够培育可持续的、互动的知识共享社区。

{"title":"Motivating STEM and non-STEM knowledge co-creation through combinations of textual cues","authors":"Qian Wu , Chei Sian Lee , Dion Hoe-Lian Goh","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101382","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101382","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online academic Q&A platforms foster collaborative knowledge creation through textual cues such as emotional expressiveness and politeness. While prior research focused on individual cues, people naturally interpret combinations of textual cues (CTCs), which remain understudied. This experiment examines how CTCs influence active participation (knowledge co-creation) and reduce passive observation (lurking) across STEM and non-STEM topics. A 2 × 3 factorial design with 109 university students tested two topic types and three CTCs associated with gain, hedonic, and normative motivations. Results show that aligning textual cues with user motivations boosts participation. Complex questions featuring hedonic and normative cues prompted more engagement than neutral ones. Gain-framed cues were more effective in STEM discussions, while hedonic and normative cues performed better in non-STEM contexts. These findings highlight how CTCs shape user behavior differently across disciplines. The insights can guide the design of more engaging prompts, enabling platform managers to foster sustainable, interactive knowledge-sharing communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From search to share: Exploring the relationships between seeking health information from diverse online sources and health misinformation sharing 从搜索到分享：探索从不同的在线来源寻求健康信息与健康错误信息共享之间的关系

IF 2.4 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101370

Chen Luo , Han Zheng , Xiaoya Yang , Yimeng Xu , Yifei He

People increasingly turn to online sources for health-related queries in today's digital landscape. This trend's hidden drawbacks, particularly the rise of health misinformation, attract scholarly attention. Drawing upon the Stressor-Strain-Outcome framework and cognitive load theory, a psychological mechanism that explains what drives health information seekers to share health misinformation in cyberspace was formulated. Results based on an online survey revealed two key findings. First, reliance on search engines and online news media was positively tied to health information overload, which, in turn, was positively associated with health information fatigue. Second, while overload did not significantly relate to misperceptions, greater fatigue was linked to increased misperceptions, and they both contributed to health misinformation sharing. This study sheds light on the transition from information seeking to misinformation sharing and discloses the relationships among information processing capacity, motivation, and beliefs. Relevant findings inform viable strategies to mitigate the spread of online health misinformation.

在当今的数字环境中，人们越来越多地转向在线资源进行与健康相关的查询。这一趋势的潜在弊端，特别是健康错误信息的增加，引起了学术界的关注。利用压力-压力-结果框架和认知负荷理论，我们提出了一种心理机制，解释了驱动健康信息寻求者在网络空间分享健康错误信息的原因。一项在线调查的结果揭示了两个关键发现。首先，对搜索引擎和在线新闻媒体的依赖与健康信息过载呈正相关，而健康信息过载又与健康信息疲劳呈正相关。其次，虽然超负荷与误解没有显著关系，但更大的疲劳与误解增加有关，它们都有助于健康错误信息的分享。本研究揭示了信息寻求到错误信息分享的转变，揭示了信息处理能力、动机和信念之间的关系。相关调查结果为减轻在线卫生错误信息传播的可行战略提供了信息。

{"title":"From search to share: Exploring the relationships between seeking health information from diverse online sources and health misinformation sharing","authors":"Chen Luo , Han Zheng , Xiaoya Yang , Yimeng Xu , Yifei He","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101370","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101370","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People increasingly turn to online sources for health-related queries in today's digital landscape. This trend's hidden drawbacks, particularly the rise of health misinformation, attract scholarly attention. Drawing upon the Stressor-Strain-Outcome framework and cognitive load theory, a psychological mechanism that explains what drives health information seekers to share health misinformation in cyberspace was formulated. Results based on an online survey revealed two key findings. First, reliance on search engines and online news media was positively tied to health information overload, which, in turn, was positively associated with health information fatigue. Second, while overload did not significantly relate to misperceptions, greater fatigue was linked to increased misperceptions, and they both contributed to health misinformation sharing. This study sheds light on the transition from information seeking to misinformation sharing and discloses the relationships among information processing capacity, motivation, and beliefs. Relevant findings inform viable strategies to mitigate the spread of online health misinformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 101370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144563357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Understanding information practices through video-based research: Opportunities and challenges of collecting researcher-generated and participant-generated video data 通过基于视频的研究理解信息实践：收集研究人员生成和参与者生成的视频数据的机遇和挑战

IF 2.4 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101366

Soo Hyeon Kim , Gi Woong Choi

Multiple types of video data can help understand children's everyday information practices as children often struggle to share their perspectives through traditional research methods. This methodological case study investigates the opportunities and challenges of collecting multiple types of video data, one generated by the research team and the other by participants, to expand the understanding of information practices. A collective case study of elementary-aged children's information practices at a summer camp, an afterschool program, and a library engineering program demonstrates that multiple types of video data captured participants' different patterns of information practices and depicted evolving transition of information practices that were mediated by both tangible and intangible tools in the environment. Video-based interaction analysis offers information science researchers a way to advance and refine theories on information practices. Involving participants in data collection and augmenting traditional methods with video may enrich the depth of research on information practices.

多种类型的视频数据可以帮助了解儿童的日常信息实践，因为儿童经常难以通过传统的研究方法分享他们的观点。本方法学案例研究调查了收集多种类型视频数据的机遇和挑战，一种由研究团队生成，另一种由参与者生成，以扩大对信息实践的理解。一项针对小学年龄儿童在夏令营、课外活动和图书馆工程项目中的信息实践的集体案例研究表明，多种类型的视频数据捕获了参与者的不同信息实践模式，并描绘了环境中有形和无形工具介导的信息实践的演变过渡。基于视频的交互分析为信息科学研究者提供了一种推进和完善信息实践理论的方法。让参与者参与数据收集和利用视频增强传统方法可以丰富信息实践研究的深度。

{"title":"Understanding information practices through video-based research: Opportunities and challenges of collecting researcher-generated and participant-generated video data","authors":"Soo Hyeon Kim , Gi Woong Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101366","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101366","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiple types of video data can help understand children's everyday information practices as children often struggle to share their perspectives through traditional research methods. This methodological case study investigates the opportunities and challenges of collecting multiple types of video data, one generated by the research team and the other by participants, to expand the understanding of information practices. A collective case study of elementary-aged children's information practices at a summer camp, an afterschool program, and a library engineering program demonstrates that multiple types of video data captured participants' different patterns of information practices and depicted evolving transition of information practices that were mediated by both tangible and intangible tools in the environment. Video-based interaction analysis offers information science researchers a way to advance and refine theories on information practices. Involving participants in data collection and augmenting traditional methods with video may enrich the depth of research on information practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 101366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144572752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Changes of information needs and emotions during COVID-19: A longitudinal view COVID-19期间信息需求和情绪的变化：纵向视角

IF 2.4 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101367

Jiaying Lizzy Liu , Sierrah Bessler , Yan Zhang , Midori McKay Komi , Annie T. Chen

This study examines how information-seeking behaviors evolved during the first year of COVID-19, addressing gaps in understanding longitudinal information and emotional needs during extended health crises. Eight hundred seventy-two U.S. adults were surveyed during Dec 2020-May 2021 using open-ended questions about information sought at pandemic onset versus survey time. Responses were analyzed using thematic analysis and the Social-Ecological Framework. Three key transitions in information needs emerged: from pandemic-specific to everyday life information, from individual to societal concerns, and from immediate to long-term considerations. Different patterns of emotional changes paralleled these informational shifts were identified. Contributing factors of these changes occurred at multiple ecological levels, individual, interpersonal, and societal, highlighting the complex, multilayered nature of influences on information-seeking behavior during crisis. These findings can inform how libraries and health communicators can better structure information services during extended health emergencies. Future research should explore affective influences on health information-seeking behaviors.

本研究考察了COVID-19第一年信息寻求行为的演变，解决了在长期健康危机期间理解纵向信息和情感需求方面的差距。在2020年12月至2021年5月期间，对872名美国成年人进行了调查，使用了关于大流行发病时与调查时间的开放式问题。利用专题分析和社会生态框架对回应进行了分析。信息需求出现了三个关键转变：从大流行病特有的信息到日常生活信息，从个人关切到社会关切，以及从眼前考虑到长期考虑。不同的情绪变化模式与这些信息的转变是一致的。这些变化的促成因素发生在多个生态层面，个人、人际和社会，突出了危机期间信息寻求行为影响的复杂性和多层性。这些发现可为图书馆和卫生传播者如何在长期突发卫生事件期间更好地组织信息服务提供信息。未来的研究应探讨情感对健康信息寻求行为的影响。

{"title":"Changes of information needs and emotions during COVID-19: A longitudinal view","authors":"Jiaying Lizzy Liu , Sierrah Bessler , Yan Zhang , Midori McKay Komi , Annie T. Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101367","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101367","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how information-seeking behaviors evolved during the first year of COVID-19, addressing gaps in understanding longitudinal information and emotional needs during extended health crises. Eight hundred seventy-two U.S. adults were surveyed during Dec 2020-May 2021 using open-ended questions about information sought at pandemic onset versus survey time. Responses were analyzed using thematic analysis and the Social-Ecological Framework. Three key transitions in information needs emerged: from pandemic-specific to everyday life information, from individual to societal concerns, and from immediate to long-term considerations. Different patterns of emotional changes paralleled these informational shifts were identified. Contributing factors of these changes occurred at multiple ecological levels, individual, interpersonal, and societal, highlighting the complex, multilayered nature of influences on information-seeking behavior during crisis. These findings can inform how libraries and health communicators can better structure information services during extended health emergencies. Future research should explore affective influences on health information-seeking behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 101367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144579805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The career pathways of academic librarians: A kaleidoscope career model analysis of faculty identity and institutional engagement 学术图书馆馆员的职业路径：教师认同与机构参与的万花筒职业模型分析

IF 2.4 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Library & Information Science Research

Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101371

James A. Wiser

This study examines how career origin, whether librarianship constitutes a first or second career, shapes academic librarians' engagement with faculty status, tenure processes, and institutional loyalty. Using the Kaleidoscope Career Model (KCM) as a theoretical framework, the research analyzed how librarians navigate the framework's phases across different career pathways, offering possible new understandings to which librarians care more about librarian faculty status than others and why. Through semi-structured interviews at two comparable institutions, the study reveals that first-career librarians often view faculty status as an expected component of their professional identity and demonstrate stronger institutional loyalty, while second-career librarians approach faculty status more pragmatically, drawing on previous experiences to maintain work-life boundaries and evaluate institutional alignment with personal values. The findings suggest that career origin influences how librarians navigate tenure expectations, and recommends mentorship programs, hybrid faculty models, and dual career ladders that recognize diverse professional backgrounds to support both groups.

本研究考察了职业起源，即图书馆工作是否构成第一或第二职业，如何影响学术图书馆员对教师地位、终身职位过程和机构忠诚度的参与。本研究使用万花筒职业模型（KCM）作为理论框架，分析了图书馆员在不同职业道路上如何在框架的阶段中导航，为图书馆员比其他人更关心图书馆员教师地位及其原因提供了可能的新理解。通过对两家类似机构的半结构化访谈，研究表明，第一职业图书馆员通常将教师地位视为其职业身份的预期组成部分，并表现出更强的机构忠诚度，而第二职业图书馆员则更务实地对待教师地位，利用以前的经验来保持工作与生活的界限，并评估机构与个人价值观的一致性。研究结果表明，职业出身会影响图书馆员对终身教职的预期，并建议采用导师计划、混合教师模式和双重职业阶梯，以支持不同的专业背景。

{"title":"The career pathways of academic librarians: A kaleidoscope career model analysis of faculty identity and institutional engagement","authors":"James A. Wiser","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101371","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101371","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how career origin, whether librarianship constitutes a first or second career, shapes academic librarians' engagement with faculty status, tenure processes, and institutional loyalty. Using the Kaleidoscope Career Model (KCM) as a theoretical framework, the research analyzed how librarians navigate the framework's phases across different career pathways, offering possible new understandings to which librarians care more about librarian faculty status than others and why. Through semi-structured interviews at two comparable institutions, the study reveals that first-career librarians often view faculty status as an expected component of their professional identity and demonstrate stronger institutional loyalty, while second-career librarians approach faculty status more pragmatically, drawing on previous experiences to maintain work-life boundaries and evaluate institutional alignment with personal values. The findings suggest that career origin influences how librarians navigate tenure expectations, and recommends mentorship programs, hybrid faculty models, and dual career ladders that recognize diverse professional backgrounds to support both groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 101371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144678790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0