首页 > 最新文献

Library & Information Science Research最新文献

英文 中文
Belonging through information: Mapping immigrant integration needs in Nordic societies 信息带来的归属感:北欧社会移民融合需求的映射
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101400
Hamed Ahmadinia
Access to clear and usable information plays a central role in how immigrants navigate everyday life in Nordic welfare societies. First-generation immigrants in Finland, Norway, and Sweden require information that explains how institutional systems are organized and how services can be accessed in practice. Semi-structured interviews with 54 first-generation immigrants from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Europe examined information practices across five domains: social life, health care, labor market participation, cultural engagement, and education. The findings show that difficulties in locating reliable information, limited access to familiar languages, and fragmented institutional communication constrain participation across daily life. Participants often relied on informal networks to compensate for unclear or inaccessible official information. These challenges shaped service use as well as immigrants' confidence and sense of belonging. The study highlights information practices as a cross-cutting element of integration and underscores how Nordic welfare institutions organize and communicate information.
在北欧福利社会中,移民如何驾驭日常生活,获取清晰可用的信息起着核心作用。芬兰、挪威和瑞典的第一代移民需要解释机构系统如何组织以及如何在实践中获得服务的信息。对54名来自亚洲、非洲、中东和欧洲的第一代移民进行了半结构化访谈,调查了五个领域的信息实践:社会生活、医疗保健、劳动力市场参与、文化参与和教育。研究结果表明,寻找可靠信息的困难、获得熟悉语言的机会有限以及机构沟通的碎片化限制了日常生活中的参与。参与者往往依靠非正式的网络来弥补不明确或无法获得的官方信息。这些挑战影响了服务的使用,也影响了移民的信心和归属感。该研究强调了信息实践作为一体化的交叉要素,并强调了北欧福利机构如何组织和传播信息。
{"title":"Belonging through information: Mapping immigrant integration needs in Nordic societies","authors":"Hamed Ahmadinia","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101400","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101400","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Access to clear and usable information plays a central role in how immigrants navigate everyday life in Nordic welfare societies. First-generation immigrants in Finland, Norway, and Sweden require information that explains how institutional systems are organized and how services can be accessed in practice. Semi-structured interviews with 54 first-generation immigrants from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Europe examined information practices across five domains: social life, health care, labor market participation, cultural engagement, and education. The findings show that difficulties in locating reliable information, limited access to familiar languages, and fragmented institutional communication constrain participation across daily life. Participants often relied on informal networks to compensate for unclear or inaccessible official information. These challenges shaped service use as well as immigrants' confidence and sense of belonging. The study highlights information practices as a cross-cutting element of integration and underscores how Nordic welfare institutions organize and communicate information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"Article 101400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146079513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-ethnographic synthesis of researchers' views on scholarly misconduct in the health sciences 研究人员对健康科学学术不端行为观点的元民族志综合
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101399
Syeda Hina Shahid , Luanne Sinnamon
Research integrity issues have significantly increased in recent years, particularly in health sciences. This qualitative systematic review investigates common forms of misconduct, contributing factors and mitigation strategies. A search in PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS in January 2023 yielded 1233 articles, of which 27 were selected after screening and quality assessment, primarily from Europe. The synthesis, guided by meta-ethnography approach (Noblit & Hare, 1988), revealed that the three forms of misconduct of most concern to researchers are fabrication and falsification, plagiarism, and unethical authorship, while emerging issues include power manipulation and failure to report integrity concerns. The synthesis highlights the detrimental effects of a ‘scientific success culture’ and the impact of situational factors on accountability among researchers. Educational and training interventions emerge as key solutions. Based on insights from the review and existing frameworks, the study recommends six core instructional areas to address misconduct in the health sciences.
近年来,研究诚信问题显著增加,特别是在健康科学领域。本定性系统综述调查了常见的不当行为形式、促成因素和缓解策略。2023年1月在PubMed、Web of Science和SCOPUS中检索得到1233篇文章,其中27篇是经过筛选和质量评估后选出的,主要来自欧洲。在元人种学方法的指导下(Noblit & Hare, 1988),综合揭示了研究人员最关心的三种形式的不当行为是伪造和伪造,剽窃和不道德的作者,而新兴的问题包括权力操纵和未报告诚信问题。该综合强调了“科学成功文化”的有害影响以及情境因素对研究人员问责制的影响。教育和培训干预措施成为关键的解决办法。根据审查和现有框架的见解,该研究建议了六个核心教学领域,以解决卫生科学中的不当行为。
{"title":"A meta-ethnographic synthesis of researchers' views on scholarly misconduct in the health sciences","authors":"Syeda Hina Shahid ,&nbsp;Luanne Sinnamon","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101399","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101399","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research integrity issues have significantly increased in recent years, particularly in health sciences. This qualitative systematic review investigates common forms of misconduct, contributing factors and mitigation strategies. A search in PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS in January 2023 yielded 1233 articles, of which 27 were selected after screening and quality assessment, primarily from Europe. The synthesis, guided by meta-ethnography approach (Noblit &amp; Hare, 1988), revealed that the three forms of misconduct of most concern to researchers are fabrication and falsification, plagiarism, and unethical authorship, while emerging issues include power manipulation and failure to report integrity concerns. The synthesis highlights the detrimental effects of a ‘scientific success culture’ and the impact of situational factors on accountability among researchers. Educational and training interventions emerge as key solutions. Based on insights from the review and existing frameworks, the study recommends six core instructional areas to address misconduct in the health sciences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"Article 101399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146079512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Data sharing intentions of neuroscience researchers: A consequentialist theory perspective 神经科学研究者的数据共享意图:结果主义理论视角
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101398
Zhoukang Wu , Liangjiecheng Huang , Min Wang , Xiaosong He
Understanding the intentions of neuroscience researchers to share data is crucial for promoting data sharing within the field. Key determinants of data sharing intentions are explored using structural equation modeling (SEM) based on consequentialist theory. A survey was conducted among 552 Chinese neuroscience researchers using convenience sampling and several scales, including the Egoism Scale, Utilitarianism Scale, and the Chinese versions of the Research Ethics Scale and Data Sharing Intention Scale. SEM analysis revealed a good fit (χ2/df = 1.637, RMSEA = 0.025, CFI = 0.960, GFI = 0.979). Egoism influenced data sharing intentions indirectly through research ethics (β = 0.333, p < 0.001), showing complete mediation. Utilitarianism had a strong direct effect (β = 0.813, p < 0.01) and a significant indirect effect (β = 0.0735, p < 0.001) on data sharing intentions. Practice norms had a weaker influence (β = 0.225, p < 0.01). Valuable insights into the data sharing intentions of neuroscience researchers are offered, highlighting the strong influence of utilitarianism on their decisions. Promoting awareness of the collective benefits through education and outreach is crucial for encouraging extensive data sharing among researchers.
了解神经科学研究人员共享数据的意图对于促进该领域内的数据共享至关重要。利用基于结果主义理论的结构方程模型(SEM)探讨了数据共享意图的关键决定因素。采用便利抽样方法,采用利己主义量表、功利主义量表、中文版《研究伦理量表》和中文版《数据共享意愿量表》对552名中国神经科学研究人员进行了调查。SEM分析结果吻合良好(χ2/df = 1.637, RMSEA = 0.025, CFI = 0.960, GFI = 0.979)。利己主义通过研究伦理间接影响数据共享意向(β = 0.333, p < 0.001),具有完全中介作用。功利主义对数据共享意愿的直接影响显著(β = 0.813, p < 0.01),间接影响显著(β = 0.0735, p < 0.001)。实践规范的影响较弱(β = 0.225, p < 0.01)。对神经科学研究人员的数据共享意图提供了有价值的见解,突出了功利主义对他们决策的强大影响。通过教育和外联促进对集体利益的认识对于鼓励研究人员之间广泛共享数据至关重要。
{"title":"Data sharing intentions of neuroscience researchers: A consequentialist theory perspective","authors":"Zhoukang Wu ,&nbsp;Liangjiecheng Huang ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaosong He","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101398","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101398","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the intentions of neuroscience researchers to share data is crucial for promoting data sharing within the field. Key determinants of data sharing intentions are explored using structural equation modeling (SEM) based on consequentialist theory. A survey was conducted among 552 Chinese neuroscience researchers using convenience sampling and several scales, including the Egoism Scale, Utilitarianism Scale, and the Chinese versions of the Research Ethics Scale and Data Sharing Intention Scale. SEM analysis revealed a good fit (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.637, RMSEA = 0.025, CFI = 0.960, GFI = 0.979). Egoism influenced data sharing intentions indirectly through research ethics (β = 0.333, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), showing complete mediation. Utilitarianism had a strong direct effect (β = 0.813, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and a significant indirect effect (β = 0.0735, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) on data sharing intentions. Practice norms had a weaker influence (β = 0.225, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Valuable insights into the data sharing intentions of neuroscience researchers are offered, highlighting the strong influence of utilitarianism on their decisions. Promoting awareness of the collective benefits through education and outreach is crucial for encouraging extensive data sharing among researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"Article 101398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145982113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Guest editorial: Library and information science research: Present, past, future 客座评论:图书馆情报学研究:现在、过去、未来
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101384
Betsy Van der Veer Martens
{"title":"Guest editorial: Library and information science research: Present, past, future","authors":"Betsy Van der Veer Martens","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101384","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101384","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Standing on the shoulders of giants: A review of reviews on health information behavior 站在巨人的肩膀上:健康信息行为综述
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101380
Xiaoqian Zhang, Yueyan Zhao, Feng Yang
Literature reviews provide comprehensive overviews of research on a given topic, serving as a foundation for future studies and uncovering new insights by situating findings within a broader context. However, little research has examined these reviews as a collective body. The landscape of review studies on health information behavior and how they have evolved over time was explored. To achieve this, a review of reviews was conducted using a sample of 91 review studies identified through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. The findings reveal that while some researchers are well-integrated into co-authorship networks, most authors tend to work independently when producing review studies. These reviews are widely dispersed across journals rather than concentrated in a few core outlets. Systematic reviews, purpose-specific reviews, and traditional reviews are the most commonly used types. These findings have practical implications for researchers aiming to produce high-quality review studies, and for journal editors, funding agencies, and policymakers seeking to trace and support the development of this field.
文献综述提供了对给定主题的研究的全面概述,作为未来研究的基础,并通过将研究结果置于更广泛的背景下发现新的见解。然而,很少有研究将这些评论作为一个整体进行检验。对健康信息行为及其如何随着时间的推移而演变的审查研究的景观进行了探索。为了实现这一目标,通过系统评价和荟萃分析流程图优选报告项目,对91项综述研究进行了综述。研究结果表明,虽然一些研究人员很好地融入了合作作者网络,但大多数作者在进行综述研究时倾向于独立工作。这些评论广泛分布在不同的期刊上,而不是集中在几个核心期刊上。系统评审、特定目的评审和传统评审是最常用的类型。这些发现对旨在产生高质量综述研究的研究人员、对寻求追踪和支持这一领域发展的期刊编辑、资助机构和政策制定者具有实际意义。
{"title":"Standing on the shoulders of giants: A review of reviews on health information behavior","authors":"Xiaoqian Zhang,&nbsp;Yueyan Zhao,&nbsp;Feng Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101380","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101380","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Literature reviews provide comprehensive overviews of research on a given topic, serving as a foundation for future studies and uncovering new insights by situating findings within a broader context. However, little research has examined these reviews as a collective body. The landscape of review studies on health information behavior and how they have evolved over time was explored. To achieve this, a review of reviews was conducted using a sample of 91 review studies identified through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. The findings reveal that while some researchers are well-integrated into co-authorship networks, most authors tend to work independently when producing review studies. These reviews are widely dispersed across journals rather than concentrated in a few core outlets. Systematic reviews, purpose-specific reviews, and traditional reviews are the most commonly used types. These findings have practical implications for researchers aiming to produce high-quality review studies, and for journal editors, funding agencies, and policymakers seeking to trace and support the development of this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are you ready? An investigation of factors affecting artificial intelligence readiness of college students 你准备好了吗?大学生人工智能准备程度影响因素调查
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101381
Yuwen Hua, Honglei Lia Sun
Artificial Intelligence (AI) brings substantial convenience to individuals' daily lives and redefines the knowledge and skills college students need. Enhancing the AI readiness (AIR) of college students will help them adapt to the advent of the AI era as early as possible. Little is known about college students' AIR and it is unclear what factors influence college students' AIR. Inspired by the social cognitive theory, a theoretical framework, that is “Environment - Cognition - AIR”, is proposed to examine the factors affecting college students' AIR and uncover the mechanisms that underlie the effect of these factors on college students' AIR. Five hundred sixty-eight college students were recruited to participate in the questionnaire survey. The partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to validate the theoretical framework. The results show that the college environmental factors (i.e., social support, teaching condition, and teaching activity) influence college students' AIR through cognitive factors (i.e., perceived relevance and self-efficacy). Perceived relevance and self-efficacy are mediating variables. These findings push the boundaries of technology readiness and provide empirical evidence for improving college students' AIR and facilitating AI education in higher education institutions.
人工智能(AI)为个人的日常生活带来了极大的便利,并重新定义了大学生所需的知识和技能。提高大学生的人工智能准备度(AIR)将有助于他们尽早适应人工智能时代的到来。我们对大学生的空气质量知之甚少,影响大学生空气质量的因素也不清楚。在社会认知理论的启发下,提出了“环境-认知-空气”的理论框架来考察大学生空气的影响因素,并揭示这些因素对大学生空气的影响机制。本研究共招募568名大学生参与问卷调查。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对理论框架进行了验证。结果表明,大学环境因素(即社会支持、教学条件和教学活动)通过认知因素(即感知关联和自我效能感)影响大学生的AIR。感知相关性和自我效能感是中介变量。这些发现推动了技术准备的界限,并为改善大学生的AIR和促进高等教育机构的人工智能教育提供了经验证据。
{"title":"Are you ready? An investigation of factors affecting artificial intelligence readiness of college students","authors":"Yuwen Hua,&nbsp;Honglei Lia Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101381","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101381","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial Intelligence (AI) brings substantial convenience to individuals' daily lives and redefines the knowledge and skills college students need. Enhancing the AI readiness (AIR) of college students will help them adapt to the advent of the AI era as early as possible. Little is known about college students' AIR and it is unclear what factors influence college students' AIR. Inspired by the social cognitive theory, a theoretical framework, that is “Environment - Cognition - AIR”, is proposed to examine the factors affecting college students' AIR and uncover the mechanisms that underlie the effect of these factors on college students' AIR. Five hundred sixty-eight college students were recruited to participate in the questionnaire survey. The partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to validate the theoretical framework. The results show that the college environmental factors (i.e., social support, teaching condition, and teaching activity) influence college students' AIR through cognitive factors (i.e., perceived relevance and self-efficacy). Perceived relevance and self-efficacy are mediating variables. These findings push the boundaries of technology readiness and provide empirical evidence for improving college students' AIR and facilitating AI education in higher education institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The innovative momentum of knowledge sharing: How does strengthening community libraries boost patent output? 知识共享的创新动力:加强社区图书馆如何促进专利产出?
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101383
Zhouhong Wang , Sitian Qiu , Tongshu Wu , Yue Bian , Peng Xiao
The community library has demonstrated potential in supporting innovation. The causal relationship between library services and innovation, focusing on how community libraries promote knowledge dissemination and increase patent output, was investigated. Using the Community Library Enhancement Program in a Chinese province as a quasi-natural experiment, the difference-in-differences method was applied to examine the effect on patent publications in 122 counties. The results demonstrate that the community libraries have significantly increased patent output, particularly in regions with lower innovation performance, by strengthening cooperative relationships with the higher-level libraries. The circulation of the libraries increased significantly during the policy implementation, yet the activities held did not. This contrast indicates the limitations in community libraries in providing opportunities for sharing tacit knowledge and promoting deeper innovation activities. The role of library services in fostering innovation and the need for community libraries to implement more inspiring and intellectually stimulating interactive library activities to enhance tacit knowledge sharing were substantiated, thereby maximizing their contribution to innovation.
社区图书馆在支持创新方面已经显示出潜力。以社区图书馆促进知识传播和增加专利产出为重点,研究了图书馆服务与创新的因果关系。以中国某省的社区图书馆加强计划为准自然实验,采用差异中的差异方法考察了该计划对122个县的专利出版物的影响。结果表明,社区图书馆通过加强与上级图书馆的合作关系,显著提高了专利产出,特别是在创新绩效较低的地区。政策实施期间,图书馆的流通量明显增加,但举办的活动却没有增加。这种对比表明了社区图书馆在提供隐性知识共享机会和促进更深层次创新活动方面的局限性。图书馆服务在促进创新方面的作用,以及社区图书馆需要实施更多鼓舞人心和激发智力的互动图书馆活动,以加强隐性知识共享,从而最大限度地发挥其对创新的贡献。
{"title":"The innovative momentum of knowledge sharing: How does strengthening community libraries boost patent output?","authors":"Zhouhong Wang ,&nbsp;Sitian Qiu ,&nbsp;Tongshu Wu ,&nbsp;Yue Bian ,&nbsp;Peng Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101383","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101383","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The community library has demonstrated potential in supporting innovation. The causal relationship between library services and innovation, focusin<u>g</u> on how community libraries promote knowledge dissemination and increase patent output, was investigated. Using the Community Library Enhancement Program in a Chinese province as a quasi-natural experiment, the difference-in-differences method was applied to examine the effect on patent publications in 122 counties. The results demonstrate that the community libraries have significantly increased patent output, particularly in regions with lower innovation performance, by strengthening cooperative relationships with the higher-level libraries. The circulation of the libraries increased significantly during the policy implementation, yet the activities held did not. This contrast indicates the limitations in community libraries in providing opportunities for sharing tacit knowledge and promoting deeper innovation activities. The role of library services in fostering innovation and the need for community libraries to implement more inspiring and intellectually stimulating interactive library activities to enhance tacit knowledge sharing were substantiated, thereby maximizing their contribution to innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TikTok as information space: A scoping review of information behavior on TikTok TikTok作为信息空间:对TikTok上信息行为的范围审查
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101379
Heather L. O'Brien, Nilou Davoudi, Melissa Nelson
TikTok, one of the fastest growing social networking apps globally, has generated a lot of scholarly and media attention in recent years. To surface the extent to which information behavior (IB) has been investigated on TikTok, a scoping review of 49 journal and conference papers was conducted to examine characteristics of the literature and coverage of IB phenomena. Papers related to TikTok and IB increased between 2020 and 2024, but publications in LIS venues were limited. The majority of authors were United States based, which may have implications for research generalizability. The surveyed papers featured a variety of methodologies, namely user interviews and surveys, and content analysis of videos. Use of LIS models, theories, and concepts was limited; while this reflects the multidisciplinary nature of TikTok research, it also meant that aspects of IB, such as re-finding, avoidance, and discovery, were underexplored and undertheorized. TikTok's algorithmic recommendation system and design features influenced information seeking and retrieval, discovery, evaluation, and sharing on the platform, but more empirical studies are needed to understand TikTok's role as an information space and its integration in the broader information behavior ecosystem.
TikTok是全球增长最快的社交网络应用之一,近年来引起了很多学术和媒体的关注。为了揭示TikTok上信息行为(IB)的研究程度,我们对49篇期刊和会议论文进行了范围审查,以检查文献的特征和IB现象的覆盖范围。2020年至2024年间,与TikTok和IB相关的论文有所增加,但在美国发表的论文数量有限。大多数作者来自美国,这可能对研究的普遍性有影响。调查论文采用了多种方法,即用户访谈和调查,以及视频内容分析。LIS模型、理论和概念的使用受到限制;虽然这反映了TikTok研究的多学科性质,但这也意味着IB的各个方面,如重新发现、回避和发现,都没有得到充分的探索和理论化。TikTok的算法推荐系统和设计特征影响了平台上的信息搜索和检索、发现、评估和分享,但需要更多的实证研究来理解TikTok作为一个信息空间的作用,以及它在更广泛的信息行为生态系统中的整合。
{"title":"TikTok as information space: A scoping review of information behavior on TikTok","authors":"Heather L. O'Brien,&nbsp;Nilou Davoudi,&nbsp;Melissa Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101379","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101379","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>TikTok, one of the fastest growing social networking apps globally, has generated a lot of scholarly and media attention in recent years. To surface the extent to which information behavior (IB) has been investigated on TikTok, a scoping review of 49 journal and conference papers was conducted to examine characteristics of the literature and coverage of IB phenomena. Papers related to TikTok and IB increased between 2020 and 2024, but publications in LIS venues were limited. The majority of authors were United States based, which may have implications for research generalizability. The surveyed papers featured a variety of methodologies, namely user interviews and surveys, and content analysis of videos. Use of LIS models, theories, and concepts was limited; while this reflects the multidisciplinary nature of TikTok research, it also meant that aspects of IB, such as re-finding, avoidance, and discovery, were underexplored and undertheorized. TikTok's algorithmic recommendation system and design features influenced information seeking and retrieval, discovery, evaluation, and sharing on the platform, but more empirical studies are needed to understand TikTok's role as an information space and its integration in the broader information behavior ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145340476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motivating STEM and non-STEM knowledge co-creation through combinations of textual cues 通过文本线索的组合激励STEM和非STEM知识的共同创造
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101382
Qian Wu , Chei Sian Lee , Dion Hoe-Lian Goh
Online academic Q&A platforms foster collaborative knowledge creation through textual cues such as emotional expressiveness and politeness. While prior research focused on individual cues, people naturally interpret combinations of textual cues (CTCs), which remain understudied. This experiment examines how CTCs influence active participation (knowledge co-creation) and reduce passive observation (lurking) across STEM and non-STEM topics. A 2 × 3 factorial design with 109 university students tested two topic types and three CTCs associated with gain, hedonic, and normative motivations. Results show that aligning textual cues with user motivations boosts participation. Complex questions featuring hedonic and normative cues prompted more engagement than neutral ones. Gain-framed cues were more effective in STEM discussions, while hedonic and normative cues performed better in non-STEM contexts. These findings highlight how CTCs shape user behavior differently across disciplines. The insights can guide the design of more engaging prompts, enabling platform managers to foster sustainable, interactive knowledge-sharing communities.
在线学术问答平台通过文本线索(如情感表达和礼貌)促进协作知识创造。虽然先前的研究侧重于单个线索,但人们自然会解释文本线索的组合(ctc),这一点仍未得到充分研究。本实验探讨了ctc如何影响STEM和非STEM主题的积极参与(知识共同创造)和减少被动观察(潜伏)。对109名大学生进行了2 × 3因子设计,测试了两种主题类型和三种与增益、享乐和规范动机相关的CTCs。结果表明,将文本提示与用户动机结合起来可以提高参与度。具有享乐和规范线索的复杂问题比中性问题更能吸引人。收益框架线索在STEM讨论中更有效,而享乐和规范线索在非STEM环境中表现更好。这些发现强调了ctc如何在不同学科中塑造不同的用户行为。这些见解可以指导设计更具吸引力的提示,使平台管理者能够培育可持续的、互动的知识共享社区。
{"title":"Motivating STEM and non-STEM knowledge co-creation through combinations of textual cues","authors":"Qian Wu ,&nbsp;Chei Sian Lee ,&nbsp;Dion Hoe-Lian Goh","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101382","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101382","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online academic Q&amp;A platforms foster collaborative knowledge creation through textual cues such as emotional expressiveness and politeness. While prior research focused on individual cues, people naturally interpret combinations of textual cues (CTCs), which remain understudied. This experiment examines how CTCs influence active participation (knowledge co-creation) and reduce passive observation (lurking) across STEM and non-STEM topics. A 2 × 3 factorial design with 109 university students tested two topic types and three CTCs associated with gain, hedonic, and normative motivations. Results show that aligning textual cues with user motivations boosts participation. Complex questions featuring hedonic and normative cues prompted more engagement than neutral ones. Gain-framed cues were more effective in STEM discussions, while hedonic and normative cues performed better in non-STEM contexts. These findings highlight how CTCs shape user behavior differently across disciplines. The insights can guide the design of more engaging prompts, enabling platform managers to foster sustainable, interactive knowledge-sharing communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From search to share: Exploring the relationships between seeking health information from diverse online sources and health misinformation sharing 从搜索到分享:探索从不同的在线来源寻求健康信息与健康错误信息共享之间的关系
IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101370
Chen Luo , Han Zheng , Xiaoya Yang , Yimeng Xu , Yifei He
People increasingly turn to online sources for health-related queries in today's digital landscape. This trend's hidden drawbacks, particularly the rise of health misinformation, attract scholarly attention. Drawing upon the Stressor-Strain-Outcome framework and cognitive load theory, a psychological mechanism that explains what drives health information seekers to share health misinformation in cyberspace was formulated. Results based on an online survey revealed two key findings. First, reliance on search engines and online news media was positively tied to health information overload, which, in turn, was positively associated with health information fatigue. Second, while overload did not significantly relate to misperceptions, greater fatigue was linked to increased misperceptions, and they both contributed to health misinformation sharing. This study sheds light on the transition from information seeking to misinformation sharing and discloses the relationships among information processing capacity, motivation, and beliefs. Relevant findings inform viable strategies to mitigate the spread of online health misinformation.
在当今的数字环境中,人们越来越多地转向在线资源进行与健康相关的查询。这一趋势的潜在弊端,特别是健康错误信息的增加,引起了学术界的关注。利用压力-压力-结果框架和认知负荷理论,我们提出了一种心理机制,解释了驱动健康信息寻求者在网络空间分享健康错误信息的原因。一项在线调查的结果揭示了两个关键发现。首先,对搜索引擎和在线新闻媒体的依赖与健康信息过载呈正相关,而健康信息过载又与健康信息疲劳呈正相关。其次,虽然超负荷与误解没有显著关系,但更大的疲劳与误解增加有关,它们都有助于健康错误信息的分享。本研究揭示了信息寻求到错误信息分享的转变,揭示了信息处理能力、动机和信念之间的关系。相关调查结果为减轻在线卫生错误信息传播的可行战略提供了信息。
{"title":"From search to share: Exploring the relationships between seeking health information from diverse online sources and health misinformation sharing","authors":"Chen Luo ,&nbsp;Han Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiaoya Yang ,&nbsp;Yimeng Xu ,&nbsp;Yifei He","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101370","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101370","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People increasingly turn to online sources for health-related queries in today's digital landscape. This trend's hidden drawbacks, particularly the rise of health misinformation, attract scholarly attention. Drawing upon the Stressor-Strain-Outcome framework and cognitive load theory, a psychological mechanism that explains what drives health information seekers to share health misinformation in cyberspace was formulated. Results based on an online survey revealed two key findings. First, reliance on search engines and online news media was positively tied to health information overload, which, in turn, was positively associated with health information fatigue. Second, while overload did not significantly relate to misperceptions, greater fatigue was linked to increased misperceptions, and they both contributed to health misinformation sharing. This study sheds light on the transition from information seeking to misinformation sharing and discloses the relationships among information processing capacity, motivation, and beliefs. Relevant findings inform viable strategies to mitigate the spread of online health misinformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 101370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144563357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Library & Information Science Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1