Dry powder inhaler deposition in the larynx and the risk of steroid inhaler laryngitis: A computational fluid dynamics study

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Aerosol Science Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106490
Shamudra Dey , Jonathan M. Bock , Guilherme J.M. Garcia
{"title":"Dry powder inhaler deposition in the larynx and the risk of steroid inhaler laryngitis: A computational fluid dynamics study","authors":"Shamudra Dey ,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Bock ,&nbsp;Guilherme J.M. Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) are a mainstay in the treatment of obstructive respiratory diseases, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Deposition of inhaled corticosteroids in the larynx elicits local side effects, potentially leading to steroid inhaler laryngitis. The objective of this study was to estimate the dose of DPIs that are deposited in the larynx relative to other regions of the respiratory tract using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). An anatomically accurate model of the airways (mouth to main bronchi) was constructed based on medical imaging of a healthy adult. Respiratory airflow and particle transport were simulated for constant inhalation rates of 30, 45, and 60 L/min. Two turbulence models were compared, namely the large eddy simulation (LES) and the <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>ω</mi><mspace></mspace><mi>S</mi><mi>S</mi><mi>T</mi></mrow></math></span> models. DPIs were assumed to generate an aerosol cloud with a log-normal particle size distribution characterized by the mass median aerodynamic diameter (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>d</mi><mn>50</mn></msub></mrow></math></span>) and geometric standard deviation (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>). We compared two commercial DPIs, namely DPI 1 had a large particle size (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>d</mi><mn>50</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> = 50 μm, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2.55</mn></mrow></math></span>) and DPI 2 had a small particle size (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>d</mi><mn>50</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> = 2 μm, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>1.99</mn></mrow></math></span>). The laryngeal dose was 1.6-to-3.8-fold higher than the bronchial dose for DPI 1, while the laryngeal and bronchial doses (units of mass per unit surface area) were similar for DPI 2 for both turbulence models and all inhalation rates. The choice of turbulence model had little impact on the total extrathoracic deposition, but a significant impact on regional doses, with the LES model predicting higher larynx-to-bronchi relative doses than the <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>ω</mi></mrow></math></span> model. Our prediction that the larynx is a hotspot for DPI deposition is consistent with the observation of laryngeal side effects in DPI users. Importantly, our simulations suggest that DPIs with larger particles (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>d</mi><mn>50</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> = 50 μm) may increase the risk of steroid inhaler laryngitis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14880,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Science","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 106490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021850224001575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) are a mainstay in the treatment of obstructive respiratory diseases, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Deposition of inhaled corticosteroids in the larynx elicits local side effects, potentially leading to steroid inhaler laryngitis. The objective of this study was to estimate the dose of DPIs that are deposited in the larynx relative to other regions of the respiratory tract using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). An anatomically accurate model of the airways (mouth to main bronchi) was constructed based on medical imaging of a healthy adult. Respiratory airflow and particle transport were simulated for constant inhalation rates of 30, 45, and 60 L/min. Two turbulence models were compared, namely the large eddy simulation (LES) and the kωSST models. DPIs were assumed to generate an aerosol cloud with a log-normal particle size distribution characterized by the mass median aerodynamic diameter (d50) and geometric standard deviation (σg). We compared two commercial DPIs, namely DPI 1 had a large particle size (d50 = 50 μm, σg=2.55) and DPI 2 had a small particle size (d50 = 2 μm, σg=1.99). The laryngeal dose was 1.6-to-3.8-fold higher than the bronchial dose for DPI 1, while the laryngeal and bronchial doses (units of mass per unit surface area) were similar for DPI 2 for both turbulence models and all inhalation rates. The choice of turbulence model had little impact on the total extrathoracic deposition, but a significant impact on regional doses, with the LES model predicting higher larynx-to-bronchi relative doses than the kω model. Our prediction that the larynx is a hotspot for DPI deposition is consistent with the observation of laryngeal side effects in DPI users. Importantly, our simulations suggest that DPIs with larger particles (d50 = 50 μm) may increase the risk of steroid inhaler laryngitis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干粉吸入器在喉部的沉积与类固醇吸入器喉炎的风险:计算流体动力学研究
干粉吸入器(DPI)是治疗哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)等阻塞性呼吸道疾病的主要药物。吸入的皮质类固醇沉积在喉部会产生局部副作用,可能导致类固醇吸入器性喉炎。本研究的目的是利用计算流体动力学(CFD)估算相对于呼吸道其他区域沉积在喉部的 DPIs 剂量。根据健康成年人的医学影像,构建了一个解剖精确的呼吸道(从口腔到主支气管)模型。模拟了 30、45 和 60 升/分钟恒定吸入速率下的呼吸气流和颗粒传输。比较了两种湍流模型,即大涡流模拟(LES)和 k-ωSST 模型。假定 DPI 生成的气溶胶云具有对数正态粒度分布,其特征是质量中值空气动力学直径(d50)和几何标准偏差(σg)。我们比较了两种商用干粉吸入器,即粒径较大的干粉吸入器 1(d50 = 50 μm,σg=2.55)和粒径较小的干粉吸入器 2(d50 = 2 μm,σg=1.99)。DPI 1 的喉部剂量是支气管剂量的 1.6-3.8 倍,而 DPI 2 在两种湍流模型和所有吸入速率下的喉部和支气管剂量(单位表面积质量)相似。湍流模型的选择对胸腔外总沉积量的影响很小,但对区域剂量的影响很大,LES 模型预测的喉-支气管相对剂量高于 k-ω 模型。我们预测喉部是 DPI 沉积的热点,这与观察到的 DPI 使用者喉部副作用是一致的。重要的是,我们的模拟结果表明,颗粒较大(d50 = 50 μm)的干粉吸入器可能会增加类固醇吸入器喉炎的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aerosol Science
Journal of Aerosol Science 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
127
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1970, the Journal of Aerosol Science considers itself the prime vehicle for the publication of original work as well as reviews related to fundamental and applied aerosol research, as well as aerosol instrumentation. Its content is directed at scientists working in engineering disciplines, as well as physics, chemistry, and environmental sciences. The editors welcome submissions of papers describing recent experimental, numerical, and theoretical research related to the following topics: 1. Fundamental Aerosol Science. 2. Applied Aerosol Science. 3. Instrumentation & Measurement Methods.
期刊最新文献
Deposition behavior of a CuZr metallic glass particle on amorphous-crystalline composites Novel quasi-static method to simulate collection efficiency and pressure drop of coalescing filters Dust resuspension from contaminated fabrics subjected to force-induced vibrations Dry powder inhaler deposition in the larynx and the risk of steroid inhaler laryngitis: A computational fluid dynamics study Numerical simulation and experimental analysis of aerosol deposition: Investigating nozzle effects on particle dynamics and deposition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1