A new framework for making carbon compensation standards considering regional differences at different scales in China

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123431
Yinan Yang , Xian Zhao , Tao Yu , Xiangyun Li , Hailian Lan , Fan Xia , Yujing Xie
{"title":"A new framework for making carbon compensation standards considering regional differences at different scales in China","authors":"Yinan Yang ,&nbsp;Xian Zhao ,&nbsp;Tao Yu ,&nbsp;Xiangyun Li ,&nbsp;Hailian Lan ,&nbsp;Fan Xia ,&nbsp;Yujing Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon compensation represents an effective strategy to promote carbon neutrality, address inter-regional inequalities, and support sustainable development. However, existing research on carbon compensation standards often neglects disparities in natural resource endowments and socioeconomic conditions among regions. This study proposes a new framework for making carbon compensation standards that account for regional differences. We explore key factors influencing the Carbon Deficit Index (CDI) and develop carbon compensation standards considering the regional differences of these factors. Carbon compensation amounts are identified and assigned at the three administrative scale: province, city, and county scale in China. The study reveals that between 2000 and 2015, the number of carbon deficit provinces increased from 9 to 21, with a spatial expansion outward from North China as the epicenter. The key factors impacting the CDI include urbanization rate, population, forest area, average annual precipitation, silt content, and soil organic carbon content. By considering regional differences in these key factors, the proposed carbon compensation standards can effectively reduce inter-regional inequalities. These standards can be applied consistently across the three administrative scales. Our findings suggest that carbon compensation standards that take into account regional differences in natural resource endowments,socioeconomic conditions, and payment capacity can enhance the fairness of carbon compensation actions at different scales, providing a valuable reference for the future development of cross-regional carbon compensation policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 123431"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479724034170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon compensation represents an effective strategy to promote carbon neutrality, address inter-regional inequalities, and support sustainable development. However, existing research on carbon compensation standards often neglects disparities in natural resource endowments and socioeconomic conditions among regions. This study proposes a new framework for making carbon compensation standards that account for regional differences. We explore key factors influencing the Carbon Deficit Index (CDI) and develop carbon compensation standards considering the regional differences of these factors. Carbon compensation amounts are identified and assigned at the three administrative scale: province, city, and county scale in China. The study reveals that between 2000 and 2015, the number of carbon deficit provinces increased from 9 to 21, with a spatial expansion outward from North China as the epicenter. The key factors impacting the CDI include urbanization rate, population, forest area, average annual precipitation, silt content, and soil organic carbon content. By considering regional differences in these key factors, the proposed carbon compensation standards can effectively reduce inter-regional inequalities. These standards can be applied consistently across the three administrative scales. Our findings suggest that carbon compensation standards that take into account regional differences in natural resource endowments,socioeconomic conditions, and payment capacity can enhance the fairness of carbon compensation actions at different scales, providing a valuable reference for the future development of cross-regional carbon compensation policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑中国不同尺度区域差异的碳补偿标准制定新框架
碳补偿是促进碳中和、解决地区间不平等和支持可持续发展的有效战略。然而,现有的碳补偿标准研究往往忽视了地区间自然资源禀赋和社会经济条件的差异。本研究为制定考虑地区差异的碳补偿标准提出了一个新框架。我们探讨了影响碳赤字指数(CDI)的关键因素,并根据这些因素的地区差异制定了碳补偿标准。碳补偿额度按省、市、县三个行政区域确定和分配。研究显示,2000 年至 2015 年,碳赤字省份从 9 个增加到 21 个,并以华北地区为中心向外扩展。影响碳赤字指数的关键因素包括城市化率、人口、森林面积、年均降水量、淤泥含量和土壤有机碳含量。通过考虑这些关键因素的地区差异,建议的碳补偿标准可以有效减少地区间的不平等。这些标准可以在三个行政区域内统一实施。我们的研究结果表明,考虑自然资源禀赋、社会经济条件和支付能力的地区差异的碳补偿标准能够提高不同尺度碳补偿行动的公平性,为未来制定跨地区碳补偿政策提供了宝贵的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Multi-scenario simulation of land use and land cover based on shared socioeconomic pathways: The case of coastal special economic zones in China [J. Environ. Manage. 335 (2023) /117536]. Corrigendum to: Synergistic adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline using a Z-scheme kaolin/g-C3N4/MoO3 nanocomposite: A sustainable approach for water treatment [J. Environ. Manage. 360 (2024) 121086/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121086]. A review on algal biomass dewatering and recovery of microalgal-based valuable products with different membrane technologies. Biochar for sustainable agriculture: Improved soil carbon storage and reduced emissions on cropland. Cationic waste hemp fibers-based membrane: Case study of anionic pollutants removal through environmentally friendly processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1