Complete streets meet fragmented policies: Sidewalks in 30 U.S. cities

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105588
Laura Messier
{"title":"Complete streets meet fragmented policies: Sidewalks in 30 U.S. cities","authors":"Laura Messier","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article contributes a qualitative analysis of the sidewalk policies of the 30 most populous cities in the United States, using a social-ecological framework to relate sidewalk policies to health outcomes. The study identifies barriers to achieving walkability and equity and opportunities for future improvement with a structured review of sidewalk ownership, planning, assessment, and financing and synthesis of common motivations for existing approaches. The cities studied have Complete Streets and Vision Zero policies, both of which prioritize pedestrian infrastructure, yet the sidewalk policies which could operationalize those goals assign responsibility to the abutting property owner in 77 % of cities. Only three cities - San Francisco, Denver, and Austin - have “equitable” policies. Widespread shortfalls in funding for sidewalk projects often undermine equity goals, regardless of policy. While sidewalk networks are required to meet walkability goals, policies largely take a patchwork approach. Thinking of sidewalk infrastructure as separate from the abutting private property offers an opportunity to realize additional funding sources and institutional capacity and, along with State and Federal support, an opportunity for sidewalk policies and networks which better support ambitious municipal goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 105588"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124008023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article contributes a qualitative analysis of the sidewalk policies of the 30 most populous cities in the United States, using a social-ecological framework to relate sidewalk policies to health outcomes. The study identifies barriers to achieving walkability and equity and opportunities for future improvement with a structured review of sidewalk ownership, planning, assessment, and financing and synthesis of common motivations for existing approaches. The cities studied have Complete Streets and Vision Zero policies, both of which prioritize pedestrian infrastructure, yet the sidewalk policies which could operationalize those goals assign responsibility to the abutting property owner in 77 % of cities. Only three cities - San Francisco, Denver, and Austin - have “equitable” policies. Widespread shortfalls in funding for sidewalk projects often undermine equity goals, regardless of policy. While sidewalk networks are required to meet walkability goals, policies largely take a patchwork approach. Thinking of sidewalk infrastructure as separate from the abutting private property offers an opportunity to realize additional funding sources and institutional capacity and, along with State and Federal support, an opportunity for sidewalk policies and networks which better support ambitious municipal goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完整的街道与零散的政策:美国 30 个城市的人行道
本文对美国人口最多的 30 个城市的人行道政策进行了定性分析,采用社会生态框架将人行道政策与健康结果联系起来。研究通过对人行道所有权、规划、评估和融资的结构性审查,以及对现有方法共同动机的综合分析,确定了实现步行便利性和公平性的障碍,以及未来改进的机会。所研究的城市都制定了 "完整街道"(Complete Streets)和 "零愿景"(Vision Zero)政策,这两项政策都将行人基础设施列为优先事项,但在 77% 的城市中,可以实现这些目标的人行道政策却将责任分配给了毗邻的业主。只有旧金山、丹佛和奥斯汀三个城市制定了 "公平 "政策。无论政策如何,人行道项目资金的普遍短缺往往会损害公平目标。虽然人行道网络是实现步行目标的必要条件,但政策大多采取修修补补的方式。将人行道基础设施与毗邻的私有财产分开考虑,为实现更多的资金来源和机构能力提供了机会,加上州政府和联邦政府的支持,人行道政策和网络有机会更好地支持雄心勃勃的市政目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Dissecting multidimensional morphology of urban sprawl: Framework for policy intervention The role of polycentric urban structures in shaping low-carbon lifestyles Socioeconomic and ethnic segregation in Finland: A multi-scale analysis of diverse urban sizes Unveiling the dynamics and determinants of world city network: Insights from global airline data Push-pull mechanisms in China's intercity population migration: Nonlinearity and asymmetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1