Knowledge and attitudes about genetically advanced loblolly pine seedlings among foresters and family forest landowners in Georgia, United States

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100722
Matt Pruitt , Carolina Berget , Puneet Dwivedi , Parag Kadam
{"title":"Knowledge and attitudes about genetically advanced loblolly pine seedlings among foresters and family forest landowners in Georgia, United States","authors":"Matt Pruitt ,&nbsp;Carolina Berget ,&nbsp;Puneet Dwivedi ,&nbsp;Parag Kadam","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to estimate the adoption rate of genetically advanced loblolly pine (<em>Pinus taeda</em>) seedlings and better understand the factors influencing seedling choice among family forest landowners and consulting foresters in Georgia, a major forestry state in the Southern United States. We conducted two online surveys, one for landowners and one for registered foresters in Georgia. Our findings reveal that the adoption rate, self-reported knowledge, and positive perceptions of genetically advanced loblolly pine seedlings were high among respondents of both surveys. The adoption rate was 13.5 % of all managed forestlands by foresters (29.3 % for managed loblolly pine stands) and 18.0 % of all the forestlands (37.4 % of managed loblolly pine stands) owned by family forest landowners. Reasons for adopting among both groups included fast growth and favorable financial outcomes. However, barriers to adoption include cost, beliefs that other factors are equally or more important than the genetics of seedlings, and the need for more evidence. Furthermore, a high proportion of each group expressed an interest in adopting genetically advanced seedlings for increasing carbon revenue over time. Our findings suggest that more research about the related benefits is needed to increase the adoption of genetically advanced loblolly pine seedlings. We also found that communicating these benefits using trusted sources is also necessary. Our study will feed into the growing movement for using better genetics to improve forest productivity and reduce forest health issues in Georgia and beyond, especially on family forestlands, as they supply the majority of roundwood and other forest-based ecosystem services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324002280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to estimate the adoption rate of genetically advanced loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) seedlings and better understand the factors influencing seedling choice among family forest landowners and consulting foresters in Georgia, a major forestry state in the Southern United States. We conducted two online surveys, one for landowners and one for registered foresters in Georgia. Our findings reveal that the adoption rate, self-reported knowledge, and positive perceptions of genetically advanced loblolly pine seedlings were high among respondents of both surveys. The adoption rate was 13.5 % of all managed forestlands by foresters (29.3 % for managed loblolly pine stands) and 18.0 % of all the forestlands (37.4 % of managed loblolly pine stands) owned by family forest landowners. Reasons for adopting among both groups included fast growth and favorable financial outcomes. However, barriers to adoption include cost, beliefs that other factors are equally or more important than the genetics of seedlings, and the need for more evidence. Furthermore, a high proportion of each group expressed an interest in adopting genetically advanced seedlings for increasing carbon revenue over time. Our findings suggest that more research about the related benefits is needed to increase the adoption of genetically advanced loblolly pine seedlings. We also found that communicating these benefits using trusted sources is also necessary. Our study will feed into the growing movement for using better genetics to improve forest productivity and reduce forest health issues in Georgia and beyond, especially on family forestlands, as they supply the majority of roundwood and other forest-based ecosystem services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国佐治亚州林业工作者和家庭林地所有者对基因先进的小叶松幼苗的认识和态度
本研究旨在估算美国南部主要林业州佐治亚州的家庭林地所有者和咨询林务人员对基因先进的龙柏(Pinus taeda)树苗的采用率,并更好地了解影响树苗选择的因素。我们进行了两次在线调查,一次针对土地所有者,另一次针对佐治亚州的注册林务人员。我们的调查结果显示,两次调查的受访者对先进基因小叶松种苗的采用率、自我报告的知识和积极看法都很高。在林务人员管理的所有林地中,采用率为 13.5%(管理的小叶松林地为 29.3%),在家庭林地所有者拥有的所有林地中,采用率为 18.0%(管理的小叶松林地为 37.4%)。这两类林地采用这种技术的原因包括生长速度快和经济效益好。然而,采用的障碍包括成本、认为其他因素与树苗遗传同样重要或更重要以及需要更多证据。此外,每组中都有很高比例的人表示有兴趣采用基因先进的种苗,以逐步增加碳收入。我们的研究结果表明,需要对相关益处进行更多研究,以提高对基因先进的小叶松树苗的采用率。我们还发现,利用可信来源宣传这些益处也很有必要。我们的研究将推动佐治亚州及其他地区利用更好的遗传学提高森林生产力和减少森林健康问题的运动不断发展,特别是在家庭林地,因为它们提供了大部分圆木和其他基于森林的生态系统服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of land dynamics transformation into tea plantations using support vector machine One hundred years of piñon nuts, a largely forgotten wild food crop from the American Southwest (1850–1950) Special issue: Forest science navigating sustainable development—A third task Editorial: Fire and environment. Issues and challenges The impacts and legacies of warfare on forest ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1