Impacts of negative congestion experiences on acceptance of tradable credits schemes: Integration of NAM and TPB

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.010
Shuang Cui , Lijun Tian , Yue Bao , Zhichao Zhang
{"title":"Impacts of negative congestion experiences on acceptance of tradable credits schemes: Integration of NAM and TPB","authors":"Shuang Cui ,&nbsp;Lijun Tian ,&nbsp;Yue Bao ,&nbsp;Zhichao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prior negative congestion experiences can influence public acceptance of congestion charging policies; however, this area remains underexplored in both academic and practical contexts. This study investigates this issue by integrating the norm activation model (NAM) and the theory of planned behavior (TPB), focusing on public acceptance of tradable credits schemes (TCS). Specifically, acceptance is measured via attitudes toward TCS and behavioral intentions to reduce car use under TCS. Using latent profile analysis, 426 participants were categorized into three distinct groups based on their prior negative congestion experiences. The findings indicate that those with high reactions exhibit stronger behavioral intentions to reduce car use. Chain mediation analysis demonstrates that prior negative congestion experiences causally impact these behavioral intentions. Moderated mediation analysis further reveals that such experiences (e.g., anxiety and bodily reactions) moderate behavioral intentions under TCS. High levels of anxiety and bodily reactions weaken the impact of personal norms on attitudes toward TCS, suggesting that individuals with intense reactions to congestion are more likely to directly support TCS. Conversely, enhancing personal norms among individuals with lower anxiety or bodily reactions tend to increase their support for TCS. Furthermore, personal norms are found to be more influential than social norms, offering greater explanatory power.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"160 ","pages":"Pages 192-211"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2400341X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior negative congestion experiences can influence public acceptance of congestion charging policies; however, this area remains underexplored in both academic and practical contexts. This study investigates this issue by integrating the norm activation model (NAM) and the theory of planned behavior (TPB), focusing on public acceptance of tradable credits schemes (TCS). Specifically, acceptance is measured via attitudes toward TCS and behavioral intentions to reduce car use under TCS. Using latent profile analysis, 426 participants were categorized into three distinct groups based on their prior negative congestion experiences. The findings indicate that those with high reactions exhibit stronger behavioral intentions to reduce car use. Chain mediation analysis demonstrates that prior negative congestion experiences causally impact these behavioral intentions. Moderated mediation analysis further reveals that such experiences (e.g., anxiety and bodily reactions) moderate behavioral intentions under TCS. High levels of anxiety and bodily reactions weaken the impact of personal norms on attitudes toward TCS, suggesting that individuals with intense reactions to congestion are more likely to directly support TCS. Conversely, enhancing personal norms among individuals with lower anxiety or bodily reactions tend to increase their support for TCS. Furthermore, personal norms are found to be more influential than social norms, offering greater explanatory power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥堵负面经验对可交易信贷计划接受度的影响:NAM 与 TPB 的整合
之前的负面拥堵经历会影响公众对拥堵收费政策的接受程度;然而,无论是在学术界还是在实践中,对这一领域的探索仍然不足。本研究通过整合规范激活模型(NAM)和计划行为理论(TPB)来研究这一问题,重点关注公众对可交易信用额度计划(TCS)的接受度。具体来说,接受度是通过对可交易信贷计划的态度和在可交易信贷计划下减少汽车使用的行为意向来衡量的。通过潜在特征分析,426 名参与者根据其先前的负面拥堵经历被分为三个不同的组别。研究结果表明,那些反应强烈的人表现出更强烈的减少使用汽车的行为意愿。链式中介分析表明,先前的负面拥堵经历会对这些行为意向产生因果影响。调节性中介分析进一步揭示了这些经历(如焦虑和身体反应)在交通管制方案下对行为意向的调节作用。高水平的焦虑和身体反应削弱了个人规范对 TCS 态度的影响,表明对拥堵反应强烈的个体更有可能直接支持 TCS。相反,焦虑或身体反应较低的人的个人规范的增强往往会增加他们对 TCS 的支持。此外,研究还发现个人规范比社会规范更具影响力,解释力更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
A model for speed and fuel refueling strategy of methanol dual-fuel liners with emission control areas Editorial Board Flight, aircraft, and crew integrated recovery policies for airlines - A deep reinforcement learning approach Impacts of negative congestion experiences on acceptance of tradable credits schemes: Integration of NAM and TPB Hub port location and routing for a single-hub feeder network: Effect of liner shipping network connectivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1