Takeout or delivery? Reoperation rates in lower extremity long bone osteomyelitis treated with debridement and local antibiotic delivery systems

Nolan M. Reinhart , Jackson P. Tate , Jacob S. Budin , Julianna E. Winter , Olivia C. Lee , William F. Sherman
{"title":"Takeout or delivery? Reoperation rates in lower extremity long bone osteomyelitis treated with debridement and local antibiotic delivery systems","authors":"Nolan M. Reinhart ,&nbsp;Jackson P. Tate ,&nbsp;Jacob S. Budin ,&nbsp;Julianna E. Winter ,&nbsp;Olivia C. Lee ,&nbsp;William F. Sherman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Early diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis is essential to prevent potential complications including sepsis, extensive bone resection, amputation, and death. Despite current treatment strategies for management of osteomyelitis, recurrence rates reported in the literature are upwards of 25 %. Current evidence comparing the efficacy of differing surgical treatments of osteomyelitis is inconclusive. The purpose of this study is to compare rates of re-debridement and amputation in patients who receive either debridement alone or debridement with placement of local antibiotic delivery systems as initial treatment for lower extremity long bone osteomyelitis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate complication rates after surgical treatment methods for osteomyelitis of the femur and tibia. The rates of re-debridement and amputation were compared in patients who received either debridement alone or debridement with placement of local antibiotic delivery systems.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study reports 73 % lower rates of re-debridement after debridement and local antibiotic delivery in tibial osteomyelitis, and 83 % lower rates of re-debridement after debridement and placement of local antibiotic delivery systems in femoral osteomyelitis compared to debridement alone. There was no significant difference in amputation rates between treatment groups for either tibial (7.4 vs 5.7 %; OR: 1.31; 95 % CI, 0.92–1.87) or femoral osteomyelitis (2.4 vs 1.4 %; OR: 1.65; 95 % CI, 0.71–4.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was a significantly decreased likelihood of re-debridement for patients who underwent initial treatment with combined debridement and placement of antibiotic delivery systems compared to debridement alone. Providers may consider this when comparing treatment options for their patients with lower extremity osteomyelitis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566224005083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis is essential to prevent potential complications including sepsis, extensive bone resection, amputation, and death. Despite current treatment strategies for management of osteomyelitis, recurrence rates reported in the literature are upwards of 25 %. Current evidence comparing the efficacy of differing surgical treatments of osteomyelitis is inconclusive. The purpose of this study is to compare rates of re-debridement and amputation in patients who receive either debridement alone or debridement with placement of local antibiotic delivery systems as initial treatment for lower extremity long bone osteomyelitis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate complication rates after surgical treatment methods for osteomyelitis of the femur and tibia. The rates of re-debridement and amputation were compared in patients who received either debridement alone or debridement with placement of local antibiotic delivery systems.

Results

This study reports 73 % lower rates of re-debridement after debridement and local antibiotic delivery in tibial osteomyelitis, and 83 % lower rates of re-debridement after debridement and placement of local antibiotic delivery systems in femoral osteomyelitis compared to debridement alone. There was no significant difference in amputation rates between treatment groups for either tibial (7.4 vs 5.7 %; OR: 1.31; 95 % CI, 0.92–1.87) or femoral osteomyelitis (2.4 vs 1.4 %; OR: 1.65; 95 % CI, 0.71–4.01).

Conclusion

There was a significantly decreased likelihood of re-debridement for patients who underwent initial treatment with combined debridement and placement of antibiotic delivery systems compared to debridement alone. Providers may consider this when comparing treatment options for their patients with lower extremity osteomyelitis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外卖还是送餐?采用清创和局部抗生素给药系统治疗下肢长骨骨髓炎的再手术率
背景骨髓炎的早期诊断和治疗对于预防潜在并发症(包括败血症、大面积骨切除、截肢和死亡)至关重要。尽管目前有治疗骨髓炎的策略,但文献报道的复发率高达 25%。目前,比较不同骨髓炎手术疗法疗效的证据尚无定论。本研究旨在比较下肢长骨骨髓炎患者在接受单纯清创术或清创术并放置局部抗生素给药系统作为初始治疗时的再次清创率和截肢率。方法本研究进行了一项回顾性队列研究,调查股骨和胫骨骨髓炎手术治疗方法后的并发症发生率。结果该研究报告显示,与单纯清创相比,胫骨骨髓炎患者在清创并使用局部抗生素后的再清创率降低了73%,股骨骨髓炎患者在清创并使用局部抗生素后的再清创率降低了83%。胫骨骨髓炎(7.4 vs 5.7 %;OR:1.31;95 % CI,0.92-1.87)或股骨髓炎(2.4 vs 1.4 %;OR:1.65;95 % CI,0.71-4.01)的截肢率在治疗组之间没有明显差异。医疗服务提供者在比较下肢骨髓炎患者的治疗方案时可以考虑这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
期刊最新文献
Biologic Augmented Scaffold-based cartilage repair: Addressing Complications and Enhancing Outcomes. Managing the arthritic wrist: Complication prevention and management. Challenges and complications in arthroscopic ankle ligament repair: Current concepts. AI in scientific publishing: Revolutionizing research with caution. Letter to editor: Sathyendra et al. Comparative study of local injections of autologous platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid in management of chronic plantar fasciitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1