Envisioning Inclusive Futures: Organizational Alternatives Beyond the Business Case Approach in the Spectrum of Utopia and Dystopia

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Futures Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2024.103501
Narcis HERACLIDE
{"title":"Envisioning Inclusive Futures: Organizational Alternatives Beyond the Business Case Approach in the Spectrum of Utopia and Dystopia","authors":"Narcis HERACLIDE","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alternative futures are conceptualized as representations that transcend the dominant socio-economic paradigm, challenging the assumptions that underpin it. The primary goal is to generate new imaginaries that reframe and expand the possibilities. To achieve this, the mobilization of utopia and its corollary, dystopia, proves instrumental in accentuating the tensions between current organizational practices and representations of the future. To question the prevailing business case approach on the inclusion of people with disabilities within organizations, we conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with visually-impaired employees and stakeholders in organizational inclusion, exploring their visions of utopian and dystopian futures. The respondents’ utopian and dystopian visions highlight tensions between the temporalities of inclusive processes and economic performance. They also prompt us to consider inclusion not as a passive process but as an active one, driven by those directly affected, and evolving over time. This approach challenges the traditional conception of inclusion, often confined to a business case perspective, by encouraging a critical examination of how organizations can transform towards inclusive futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 103501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative futures are conceptualized as representations that transcend the dominant socio-economic paradigm, challenging the assumptions that underpin it. The primary goal is to generate new imaginaries that reframe and expand the possibilities. To achieve this, the mobilization of utopia and its corollary, dystopia, proves instrumental in accentuating the tensions between current organizational practices and representations of the future. To question the prevailing business case approach on the inclusion of people with disabilities within organizations, we conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with visually-impaired employees and stakeholders in organizational inclusion, exploring their visions of utopian and dystopian futures. The respondents’ utopian and dystopian visions highlight tensions between the temporalities of inclusive processes and economic performance. They also prompt us to consider inclusion not as a passive process but as an active one, driven by those directly affected, and evolving over time. This approach challenges the traditional conception of inclusion, often confined to a business case perspective, by encouraging a critical examination of how organizations can transform towards inclusive futures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
展望包容性未来:乌托邦与乌托邦光谱中商业案例法之外的组织替代方案
另类未来的概念是超越主流社会经济范式的表述,对作为其基础的假设提出挑战。其主要目标是产生新的想象,重构和扩展各种可能性。为了实现这一目标,乌托邦及其必然结果--非乌托邦的动员被证明有助于突出当前组织实践与未来表述之间的紧张关系。为了对组织内残障人士融入的主流商业案例方法提出质疑,我们对视障员工和组织融入的利益相关者进行了 18 次半结构式访谈,探索他们对乌托邦和乌托邦式未来的看法。受访者的乌托邦和乌托邦愿景凸显了全纳进程的时间性与经济绩效之间的矛盾。这也促使我们不要将全纳视为一个被动的过程,而应将其视为一个主动的过程,由直接受影响者推动,并随着时间的推移而不断发展。这种方法对传统的全纳概念提出了挑战,因为传统的全纳概念往往局限于商业案例的视角,它鼓励我们对组织如何向全纳的未来转型进行批判性的审视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
期刊最新文献
Theorizing ‘the future’ in higher education: A framework for studying affective futurity Editorial Board Tell me an (un)fortunate story: Advancing storytelling methods in energy futures research Feminist urban futures: Envisioning the future of Ukrainian cities through the lens of the displaced community in Valencia (Spain) Envisioning Inclusive Futures: Organizational Alternatives Beyond the Business Case Approach in the Spectrum of Utopia and Dystopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1