Transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia: exploring dosage and working memory enhancement

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101461
Shih-Chiang Ke , Philip Tseng
{"title":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia: exploring dosage and working memory enhancement","authors":"Shih-Chiang Ke ,&nbsp;Philip Tseng","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Schizophrenia often presents with working memory impairment, associated with abnormal dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation. While noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), have demonstrated effective working memory enhancement in healthy individuals with just one session of stimulation, the same protocol has not shown similar improvements in working memory for individuals with schizophrenia. Here, we briefly review the TMS and working memory literature in schizophrenia and highlight the possible role of TMS dosage. Specifically, previous studies with fewer than 20 TMS sessions show limited response, while studies with 20 sessions present mixed findings. Interestingly, a higher number of sessions, notably 40, reveal a potentially promising effect on working memory improvement, albeit with delayed manifestation. The optimal TMS dosage for robust neural plasticity remains unclear. Future research should explore increased TMS sessions, coupled with longer follow-up durations, to comprehensively investigate working memory enhancement in schizophrenia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101461"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624001128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia often presents with working memory impairment, associated with abnormal dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation. While noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), have demonstrated effective working memory enhancement in healthy individuals with just one session of stimulation, the same protocol has not shown similar improvements in working memory for individuals with schizophrenia. Here, we briefly review the TMS and working memory literature in schizophrenia and highlight the possible role of TMS dosage. Specifically, previous studies with fewer than 20 TMS sessions show limited response, while studies with 20 sessions present mixed findings. Interestingly, a higher number of sessions, notably 40, reveal a potentially promising effect on working memory improvement, albeit with delayed manifestation. The optimal TMS dosage for robust neural plasticity remains unclear. Future research should explore increased TMS sessions, coupled with longer follow-up durations, to comprehensively investigate working memory enhancement in schizophrenia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅磁刺激治疗精神分裂症:探索剂量和工作记忆的增强作用
精神分裂症患者通常会出现工作记忆障碍,这与背外侧前额叶皮层激活异常有关。虽然经颅磁刺激(TMS)等非侵入性脑刺激技术已证明只需一次刺激就能有效增强健康人的工作记忆,但同样的方案并没有对精神分裂症患者的工作记忆有类似的改善。在此,我们简要回顾了精神分裂症患者的经颅磁刺激和工作记忆文献,并强调了经颅磁刺激剂量可能起到的作用。具体来说,以往的研究显示,少于 20 次 TMS 治疗的反应有限,而 20 次治疗的研究结果不一。有趣的是,更多疗程(尤其是 40 个疗程)的研究显示,对工作记忆的改善具有潜在的良好效果,尽管这种效果会延迟显现。TMS对神经可塑性的最佳剂量仍不明确。未来的研究应探索增加经颅磁刺激的次数,同时延长随访时间,以全面研究精神分裂症患者工作记忆的改善情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
Neurostimulation to improve cognitive flexibility Editorial Board How dopamine enables learning from aversion Relating mind-blanking to the content and dynamics of spontaneous thinking Dynamical measures of developing neuroelectric fields in emerging consciousness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1