Nationalist enclaves: Industrialising the critical mineral boom in Indonesia

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.exis.2024.101564
Eve Warburton
{"title":"Nationalist enclaves: Industrialising the critical mineral boom in Indonesia","authors":"Eve Warburton","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nickel's new status as a critical transition mineral has altered developmental agendas in the world's largest producer—Indonesia. The country's resource nationalist ambitions for a higher-value downstream mining industry dovetail with global demand for nickel, a key ingredient in low-carbon technologies like electric vehicles. Indonesia banned raw nickel exports and forced importers, primarily from China, to invest in downstream processing facilities. As a result, Indonesia's nickel industry expanded at breathtaking speed, export revenues soared, and economic growth along the country's nickel belt grew to over three times the national average. Indonesia's leaders cast the downstream sector as both an economic success story and a point of nationalist pride. This paper reflects critically on nickel-led growth in Indonesia, arguing the industry is generating <em>new nationalist enclaves.</em> I advance this concept to capture the paradox that new nickel-based industrial parks meet resource nationalist demands for a value-added extractive sector; yet the parks emerge as reconstituted extractive economic enclaves. Nickel-led growth relies on narrow networks of foreign and politically-connected domestic capital, and the industry's benefits are unevenly distributed. These political economy arrangements generate positive pecuniary externalities for a narrow set of state and private actors, and familiar negative externalities for the environment and communities at sites of extraction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101564"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nickel's new status as a critical transition mineral has altered developmental agendas in the world's largest producer—Indonesia. The country's resource nationalist ambitions for a higher-value downstream mining industry dovetail with global demand for nickel, a key ingredient in low-carbon technologies like electric vehicles. Indonesia banned raw nickel exports and forced importers, primarily from China, to invest in downstream processing facilities. As a result, Indonesia's nickel industry expanded at breathtaking speed, export revenues soared, and economic growth along the country's nickel belt grew to over three times the national average. Indonesia's leaders cast the downstream sector as both an economic success story and a point of nationalist pride. This paper reflects critically on nickel-led growth in Indonesia, arguing the industry is generating new nationalist enclaves. I advance this concept to capture the paradox that new nickel-based industrial parks meet resource nationalist demands for a value-added extractive sector; yet the parks emerge as reconstituted extractive economic enclaves. Nickel-led growth relies on narrow networks of foreign and politically-connected domestic capital, and the industry's benefits are unevenly distributed. These political economy arrangements generate positive pecuniary externalities for a narrow set of state and private actors, and familiar negative externalities for the environment and communities at sites of extraction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族主义飞地:印度尼西亚关键矿产繁荣的工业化
镍作为重要过渡矿产的新地位改变了世界最大生产国--印度尼西亚的发展议程。印尼的资源民族主义野心是发展价值更高的下游采矿业,这与全球对镍的需求不谋而合,而镍是电动汽车等低碳技术的关键成分。印尼禁止镍原料出口,并迫使进口商(主要来自中国)投资下游加工设施。结果,印尼的镍产业以惊人的速度扩张,出口收入飙升,印尼镍矿带沿线的经济增长超过了全国平均水平的三倍。印尼领导人将下游行业视为经济成功的典范和民族自豪感的象征。本文对印尼以镍为主导的经济增长进行了批判性反思,认为该行业正在产生新的民族主义飞地。我提出这一概念是为了捕捉这样一个悖论:以镍为基础的新工业园区满足了资源民族主义对高附加值采掘业的需求;然而,这些园区却成为了重新组合的采掘经济飞地。以镍为主导的增长依赖于外国资本和与政治有关联的国内资本的狭隘网络,该产业的利益分配不均。这些政治经济安排为少数国家和私人行为者带来了积极的金钱外部效应,同时也为采掘地的环境和社区带来了众所周知的消极外部效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Child labor in artisanal and small-scale mining: Implications for health, development and poverty Evolving corporate social responsibility practices and their impact on social conflict Mining in Africa: Are local communities paying the price of the global energy transition? Power and community engagement: Developmental impact of community development agreement in Kono diamond mining areas, Sierra Leone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1