A critical review on mitigation strategies for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from water matrices with special emphasis on techno-economic and life cycle assessment: Current status, knowledge gaps, and future perspectives
Neha Sharma, Almeenu Rasheed, Nehaun Zargar, Sovik Das
{"title":"A critical review on mitigation strategies for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from water matrices with special emphasis on techno-economic and life cycle assessment: Current status, knowledge gaps, and future perspectives","authors":"Neha Sharma, Almeenu Rasheed, Nehaun Zargar, Sovik Das","doi":"10.1016/j.jece.2024.114863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread detection of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in aqueous environment has emerged as a global concern due to their persistent nature, high stability, and potential toxicity. Thus, in the recent decades, removal of PFAS from water matrices has garnered tremendous attention of researchers to combat this pervasive environmental threat and mitigate the risk imparted by these toxic compounds on living beings and the environment. In this context, this critical review elucidates different technologies based on their removal mechanisms, either separation or degradation, employed for the remediation of PFAS from water matrices. This review also emphasizes on techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of the discussed technologies for evaluating their practical feasibility before deploying them on the field for remediation of PFAS, which are generally overlooked while comparing different technologies. The strength-weakness-opportunity-threat (SWOT) analysis of discussed technologies is also presented in this article, with the aim to provide insight into underlying opportunities and challenges with these technologies, thus beneficial in electing the best technology for PFAS remediation. This paper also highlights the current challenges, limiting the application of these technologies at the field-scale that necessitate further efforts and can be further translated into plausible future research opportunities. In a nutshell, this paper intends to guide the researchers by presenting a systematic review of different technologies employed for PFAS remediation by critically comparing these technologies through SWOT analysis along with their LCA and TEA, enabling scientists to identify the most effective, sustainable, and economically feasible PFAS remediation technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","volume":"12 6","pages":"Article 114863"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343724029956","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The widespread detection of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in aqueous environment has emerged as a global concern due to their persistent nature, high stability, and potential toxicity. Thus, in the recent decades, removal of PFAS from water matrices has garnered tremendous attention of researchers to combat this pervasive environmental threat and mitigate the risk imparted by these toxic compounds on living beings and the environment. In this context, this critical review elucidates different technologies based on their removal mechanisms, either separation or degradation, employed for the remediation of PFAS from water matrices. This review also emphasizes on techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of the discussed technologies for evaluating their practical feasibility before deploying them on the field for remediation of PFAS, which are generally overlooked while comparing different technologies. The strength-weakness-opportunity-threat (SWOT) analysis of discussed technologies is also presented in this article, with the aim to provide insight into underlying opportunities and challenges with these technologies, thus beneficial in electing the best technology for PFAS remediation. This paper also highlights the current challenges, limiting the application of these technologies at the field-scale that necessitate further efforts and can be further translated into plausible future research opportunities. In a nutshell, this paper intends to guide the researchers by presenting a systematic review of different technologies employed for PFAS remediation by critically comparing these technologies through SWOT analysis along with their LCA and TEA, enabling scientists to identify the most effective, sustainable, and economically feasible PFAS remediation technology.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (JECE) serves as a platform for the dissemination of original and innovative research focusing on the advancement of environmentally-friendly, sustainable technologies. JECE emphasizes the transition towards a carbon-neutral circular economy and a self-sufficient bio-based economy. Topics covered include soil, water, wastewater, and air decontamination; pollution monitoring, prevention, and control; advanced analytics, sensors, impact and risk assessment methodologies in environmental chemical engineering; resource recovery (water, nutrients, materials, energy); industrial ecology; valorization of waste streams; waste management (including e-waste); climate-water-energy-food nexus; novel materials for environmental, chemical, and energy applications; sustainability and environmental safety; water digitalization, water data science, and machine learning; process integration and intensification; recent developments in green chemistry for synthesis, catalysis, and energy; and original research on contaminants of emerging concern, persistent chemicals, and priority substances, including microplastics, nanoplastics, nanomaterials, micropollutants, antimicrobial resistance genes, and emerging pathogens (viruses, bacteria, parasites) of environmental significance.