Development pathways for low carbon cities in China: A dual perspective of effectiveness and efficiency

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112848
Xiangrui Xu , Lu Chen , Xiaoyun Du , Qiaojing Chen , Renpeng Yuan
{"title":"Development pathways for low carbon cities in China: A dual perspective of effectiveness and efficiency","authors":"Xiangrui Xu ,&nbsp;Lu Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Du ,&nbsp;Qiaojing Chen ,&nbsp;Renpeng Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global economic growth has led to substantial carbon dioxide emissions, positioning urban low-carbon transformation as a crucial strategy for addressing climate change. A scientific evaluation of low-carbon city (LCC) performance is vital for effective implementation. However, existing studies predominantly focus on assessing LCCs from a singular perspective of either effectiveness or efficiency, often neglecting a comprehensive consideration of both. To address this gap, this study employs Back Propagation (BP) Neural Network and three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models to conduct an empirical assessment of LCC performance in 35 mega-cities in China from both effectiveness and efficiency dimensions. The findings reveal that: (1) The dual-perspective evaluation method effectively reflects LCC performance from both process and outcome aspects; (2) In some regions, effectiveness and efficiency yield consistent results, indicating both are either high or low; conversely, in other regions, they exhibit complementarity, with instances of high effectiveness coupled with low efficiency, or vice versa; (3) Temporal analysis indicates a continuous improvement in LCC effectiveness over the study period, while efficiency demonstrates considerable fluctuations; (4) Spatial analysis highlights that cities like Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen excel, whereas Taiyuan, Hefei, and Zhengzhou lag behind. This research offers essential policy insights for the construction of LCCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112848"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global economic growth has led to substantial carbon dioxide emissions, positioning urban low-carbon transformation as a crucial strategy for addressing climate change. A scientific evaluation of low-carbon city (LCC) performance is vital for effective implementation. However, existing studies predominantly focus on assessing LCCs from a singular perspective of either effectiveness or efficiency, often neglecting a comprehensive consideration of both. To address this gap, this study employs Back Propagation (BP) Neural Network and three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models to conduct an empirical assessment of LCC performance in 35 mega-cities in China from both effectiveness and efficiency dimensions. The findings reveal that: (1) The dual-perspective evaluation method effectively reflects LCC performance from both process and outcome aspects; (2) In some regions, effectiveness and efficiency yield consistent results, indicating both are either high or low; conversely, in other regions, they exhibit complementarity, with instances of high effectiveness coupled with low efficiency, or vice versa; (3) Temporal analysis indicates a continuous improvement in LCC effectiveness over the study period, while efficiency demonstrates considerable fluctuations; (4) Spatial analysis highlights that cities like Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen excel, whereas Taiyuan, Hefei, and Zhengzhou lag behind. This research offers essential policy insights for the construction of LCCs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国低碳城市的发展路径:效益与效率的双重视角
全球经济增长导致大量二氧化碳排放,城市低碳转型成为应对气候变化的重要战略。科学评估低碳城市(LCC)的绩效对于有效实施至关重要。然而,现有研究主要侧重于从效果或效率的单一角度评估低碳城市,往往忽视了对两者的综合考虑。针对这一不足,本研究采用反向传播(BP)神经网络和三阶段数据包络分析(DEA)模型,从效果和效率两个维度对中国 35 个特大城市的低碳城市绩效进行了实证评估。研究结果表明(1) 双视角评价方法从过程和结果两个方面有效地反映了LCC绩效;(2) 在一些地区,有效性和效率的结果是一致的,即二者或高或低;反之,在另一些地区,二者表现出互补性,即有效性高而效率低,反之亦然;(3) 时间分析表明,在研究期间,LCC 的有效性不断提高,而效率则有较大波动;(4) 空间分析表明,上海、广州和深圳等城市表现突出,而太原、合肥和郑州则相对落后。这项研究为低碳城市建设提供了重要的政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Improving ecosystem respiration estimates for CO2 flux partitioning by discriminating water and temperature controls on above- and below-ground sources Evaluating the performance of spectral indices and meteorological variables as indicators of live fuel moisture content in Mediterranean shrublands Importance of the interplay between land cover and topography in modeling habitat selection Inequity in accessibility to urban parks in environmental gentrification areas based on Multi-G3SFCA: A case study of Wuhan’s main urban districts Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for determining the optimal conservation priority of ecological services in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1