Decolonizing or Re-colonizing? Community members’ perspectives of global service learning programs

Noel Habashy , Nicole Webster , Carter A. Hunt
{"title":"Decolonizing or Re-colonizing? Community members’ perspectives of global service learning programs","authors":"Noel Habashy ,&nbsp;Nicole Webster ,&nbsp;Carter A. Hunt","doi":"10.1016/j.wds.2024.100190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global service learning (GSL) sits at the interdisciplinary intersection of international development and study abroad, with visiting university students engaging in community development projects. Many GSL programs assert they contribute to the development of local communities, and promote greater cultural understanding for student participants. However, GSL can be a setting where unequal power dynamics are reinforced, and local community interests and histories are overlooked or patronized. Unfortunately, despite the growing emphasis on evaluation among international development and education abroad programs, few empirical studies exist to examine the perspectives of local communities that host GSL programs. The purpose of this research is to assess community power dynamics as affected by GSL using a comparative case study of communities in Costa Rica and Kenya. A rapid ethnographic approach yielded qualitative data via semi-structured interviews, archival sources, and participant observation. A comparative analysis of these data highlights the ways local residents engage with service learning programs, opportunities provided to residents with access to programs, and obstacles to a more ethical community development. Our study finds residents in these cases value relationships with visiting students and infrastructure development within a community, however, they lament instances where students and organizations do not listen to their perspectives. Our findings will be relevant to the design and implementation of the thousands of education abroad and international volunteer programs taking place annually. Without seeking insights from local residents, global service learning may be reinforcing colonialistic patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101285,"journal":{"name":"World Development Sustainability","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global service learning (GSL) sits at the interdisciplinary intersection of international development and study abroad, with visiting university students engaging in community development projects. Many GSL programs assert they contribute to the development of local communities, and promote greater cultural understanding for student participants. However, GSL can be a setting where unequal power dynamics are reinforced, and local community interests and histories are overlooked or patronized. Unfortunately, despite the growing emphasis on evaluation among international development and education abroad programs, few empirical studies exist to examine the perspectives of local communities that host GSL programs. The purpose of this research is to assess community power dynamics as affected by GSL using a comparative case study of communities in Costa Rica and Kenya. A rapid ethnographic approach yielded qualitative data via semi-structured interviews, archival sources, and participant observation. A comparative analysis of these data highlights the ways local residents engage with service learning programs, opportunities provided to residents with access to programs, and obstacles to a more ethical community development. Our study finds residents in these cases value relationships with visiting students and infrastructure development within a community, however, they lament instances where students and organizations do not listen to their perspectives. Our findings will be relevant to the design and implementation of the thousands of education abroad and international volunteer programs taking place annually. Without seeking insights from local residents, global service learning may be reinforcing colonialistic patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非殖民化还是再殖民化?社区成员对全球服务学习计划的看法
全球服务学习(GSL)是国际发展和留学的跨学科交叉学科,来访的大学生参与社区发展项目。许多全球服务学习项目声称,它们有助于当地社区的发展,并促进学生参与者对文化的理解。然而,在 GSL 的环境中,不平等的权力动态会被强化,当地社区的利益和历史会被忽视或轻视。遗憾的是,尽管国际发展和海外教育项目越来越重视评估,但很少有实证研究来考察主办 GSL 项目的当地社区的观点。本研究的目的是通过对哥斯达黎加和肯尼亚社区的比较案例研究,评估受 GSL 影响的社区权力动态。通过半结构式访谈、档案资料和参与观察,采用快速人种学方法获得了定性数据。通过对这些数据的比较分析,突出了当地居民参与服务学习项目的方式、为居民提供的参与项目的机会,以及实现更有道德的社区发展所面临的障碍。我们的研究发现,在这些案例中,居民非常重视与来访学生的关系以及社区内的基础设施建设,但是,他们也对学生和组织不倾听他们观点的情况表示遗憾。我们的研究结果对每年成千上万的海外教育和国际志愿者项目的设计和实施都很有意义。如果不征求当地居民的意见,全球服务学习可能会强化殖民主义模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adoption of modern aquaculture technologies in fish farming: The case of rural Bangladesh Toward SDG's 8: How sustainability livelihood affecting survival strategy of woman entrepreneurs in Indonesia Towards zero-carbon, resilient, and community-integrated smart schools and campuses: A review The path to green economy: Do environmental taxes and renewable energy transition matter in OECD countries? Decolonizing or Re-colonizing? Community members’ perspectives of global service learning programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1