National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104660
Julia de Ternay , Claire Meley , Patrick Guerin , Sébastien Meige , Nicolas Grelaud , Benjamin Rolland , Mathieu Chappuy
{"title":"National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022","authors":"Julia de Ternay ,&nbsp;Claire Meley ,&nbsp;Patrick Guerin ,&nbsp;Sébastien Meige ,&nbsp;Nicolas Grelaud ,&nbsp;Benjamin Rolland ,&nbsp;Mathieu Chappuy","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pregabalin is a drug approved for neuropathic pain, epilepsy and general anxiety disorder. However, pregabalin is also an increasing cause of diversion and misuse, and, for this reason, the French health authorities have decided in 2021 to classify it as a narcotic drug, requiring secured prescription pads. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of this measure on pregabalin dispensation patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from a national representative sample of 12,690 French community pharmacies, we assessed the impact of the new regulatory framework, implemented in June 2021, on the total monthly quantity of pregabalin dispensed by conducting an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis. We built a counterfactual model to predict what would have happened without the intervention. We conducted the same analyses in the subsample of pregabalin dispensations exceeding the maximum recommended dosage of 600 mg per day. Additionally, we compared (1) the number of pregabalin dispensations (2) the co-dispensing of opioids and/or benzodiazepines one year before and one year after the regulation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following the regulatory change, there was an immediate and significant drop of 38,475,375 mg (95 %CI [-66,931,799 mg; -10,018,951 mg] in pregabalin dispensations. This decline continued in the following months, with a decrease of 4,788,107 mg (95 %CI: [-8,888,326 mg; -687,888 mg] per month. The counterfactual model predicted that, without the intervention, there would have been no notable change in pregabalin dispensations. The ITS analyses showed no significant change in pregabalin dispensations following the new regulation for the subsample with doses exceeding 600 mg per day. Concurrently, there was a significant decrease in co-dispensing of opioids (18.4 % pre-regulation versus 11.6 % post-regulation, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and benzodiazepines (21.4 % pre-regulation versus 11.7 % post-regulation, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The constraining regulation adopted in 2021 by the French health authorities significantly curtailed total pregabalin dispensing in community pharmacies. Our findings underscore the importance of regulatory measures to limit the misuse of a prescribed medication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095539592400344X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pregabalin is a drug approved for neuropathic pain, epilepsy and general anxiety disorder. However, pregabalin is also an increasing cause of diversion and misuse, and, for this reason, the French health authorities have decided in 2021 to classify it as a narcotic drug, requiring secured prescription pads. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of this measure on pregabalin dispensation patterns.

Methods

Using data from a national representative sample of 12,690 French community pharmacies, we assessed the impact of the new regulatory framework, implemented in June 2021, on the total monthly quantity of pregabalin dispensed by conducting an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis. We built a counterfactual model to predict what would have happened without the intervention. We conducted the same analyses in the subsample of pregabalin dispensations exceeding the maximum recommended dosage of 600 mg per day. Additionally, we compared (1) the number of pregabalin dispensations (2) the co-dispensing of opioids and/or benzodiazepines one year before and one year after the regulation.

Results

Following the regulatory change, there was an immediate and significant drop of 38,475,375 mg (95 %CI [-66,931,799 mg; -10,018,951 mg] in pregabalin dispensations. This decline continued in the following months, with a decrease of 4,788,107 mg (95 %CI: [-8,888,326 mg; -687,888 mg] per month. The counterfactual model predicted that, without the intervention, there would have been no notable change in pregabalin dispensations. The ITS analyses showed no significant change in pregabalin dispensations following the new regulation for the subsample with doses exceeding 600 mg per day. Concurrently, there was a significant decrease in co-dispensing of opioids (18.4 % pre-regulation versus 11.6 % post-regulation, p < 0.001) and benzodiazepines (21.4 % pre-regulation versus 11.7 % post-regulation, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The constraining regulation adopted in 2021 by the French health authorities significantly curtailed total pregabalin dispensing in community pharmacies. Our findings underscore the importance of regulatory measures to limit the misuse of a prescribed medication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020-2022 年限制性监管框架对法国普瑞巴林配药的全国性影响
背景普瑞巴林是一种获准用于治疗神经性疼痛、癫痫和一般焦虑症的药物。然而,普瑞巴林也日益成为被转移和滥用的原因,因此,法国卫生当局决定在 2021 年将其列为麻醉药品,要求使用安全的处方笺。我们的研究旨在评估这一措施对普瑞巴林配药模式的影响。方法我们利用具有全国代表性的 12,690 家法国社区药房的样本数据,通过中断时间序列 (ITS) 分析,评估了 2021 年 6 月实施的新监管框架对普瑞巴林每月配药总量的影响。我们建立了一个反事实模型,以预测在没有干预措施的情况下会发生什么。我们对普瑞巴林配药量超过每天 600 毫克最高推荐剂量的子样本进行了同样的分析。此外,我们还比较了(1)普瑞巴林的配药次数(2)法规实施前一年和法规实施后一年阿片类药物和/或苯二氮卓类药物的联合配药情况。结果法规实施后,普瑞巴林的配药次数立即大幅下降了 38,475,375 毫克(95 %CI [-66,931,799 毫克;-10,018,951 毫克])。这种下降趋势在接下来的几个月中仍在继续,每月减少 4,788,107 毫克(95 %CI:[-8,888,326 毫克;-687,888 毫克])。根据反事实模型预测,如果不采取干预措施,普瑞巴林的用量将不会发生显著变化。ITS 分析表明,在新法规实施后,每日剂量超过 600 毫克的亚样本的普瑞巴林配药量没有发生显著变化。同时,阿片类药物(监管前为 18.4%,监管后为 11.6%,p <0.001)和苯二氮卓类药物(监管前为 21.4%,监管后为 11.7%,p <0.001)的联合配药量大幅减少。我们的研究结果强调了限制滥用处方药的监管措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022 Suboptimal uptake and placement of a mandatory alcohol pregnancy warning label in Australia Increases in employment over six months following Khanya: A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered behavioral intervention for substance use and HIV medication adherence in Cape Town, South Africa The criminal careers of Australian drug traffickers Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis cultivation and use in 18 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1