Retrospective cross-sectional observational study on commuters' travel behaviour and preferences in Delhi: Impact of built environment, individual attitude and socio-economic factors

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.002
Tanya Sharma , Suresh Jain
{"title":"Retrospective cross-sectional observational study on commuters' travel behaviour and preferences in Delhi: Impact of built environment, individual attitude and socio-economic factors","authors":"Tanya Sharma ,&nbsp;Suresh Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the factors influencing the travel behaviour of Delhi's working population, utilizing retrospective cross-sectional data from 2005 to 2019 collected across four neighbourhoods. The research provides empirical evidence on how travel mode choices have evolved over time in response to changes in the built environment and socioeconomic conditions. GIS-based analysis was conducted to assess the impact of temporal variations in the built environment on travel behaviour. Results reveal a 21% increase in the reliance on private modes of transportation between 2005 and 2019, with the most significant rise observed in 4-wheeler usage. Conversely, bus usage declined by 32%, attributed to various factors including overcrowding, hygiene concerns, and perceived reliability issues. However, in 2019, Connaught Place reported the highest bus usage at 28%, attributed to its high bus stop density, while enhanced metro facilities across the neighbourhoods led to a 20% increase in overall metro ridership. Multinomial logistic regression analysis identified key socioeconomic determinants of travel behaviour, including age, gender, income, vehicle ownership, and commuter attitude. In 2005, two-wheeler preference over buses was primarily driven by vehicle ownership (O.R.: 620.95), gender (O.R.: 4.20), and income (O.R.: 1.28). By 2019, commuter attitude (ProPV) emerged as a significant factor, alongside vehicle ownership (O.R.: 136.72), ProPV (O.R.: 21.41), and income (O.R.: 2.14). A similar trend was observed for car usage, highlighting the increasing influence of commuter behaviour and attitudes on travel choices over time. These findings underscore critical policy implications for the development and enhancement of Delhi's transport system, offering insights that could be applicable to other cities facing similar challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Pages 17-30"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24003330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the factors influencing the travel behaviour of Delhi's working population, utilizing retrospective cross-sectional data from 2005 to 2019 collected across four neighbourhoods. The research provides empirical evidence on how travel mode choices have evolved over time in response to changes in the built environment and socioeconomic conditions. GIS-based analysis was conducted to assess the impact of temporal variations in the built environment on travel behaviour. Results reveal a 21% increase in the reliance on private modes of transportation between 2005 and 2019, with the most significant rise observed in 4-wheeler usage. Conversely, bus usage declined by 32%, attributed to various factors including overcrowding, hygiene concerns, and perceived reliability issues. However, in 2019, Connaught Place reported the highest bus usage at 28%, attributed to its high bus stop density, while enhanced metro facilities across the neighbourhoods led to a 20% increase in overall metro ridership. Multinomial logistic regression analysis identified key socioeconomic determinants of travel behaviour, including age, gender, income, vehicle ownership, and commuter attitude. In 2005, two-wheeler preference over buses was primarily driven by vehicle ownership (O.R.: 620.95), gender (O.R.: 4.20), and income (O.R.: 1.28). By 2019, commuter attitude (ProPV) emerged as a significant factor, alongside vehicle ownership (O.R.: 136.72), ProPV (O.R.: 21.41), and income (O.R.: 2.14). A similar trend was observed for car usage, highlighting the increasing influence of commuter behaviour and attitudes on travel choices over time. These findings underscore critical policy implications for the development and enhancement of Delhi's transport system, offering insights that could be applicable to other cities facing similar challenges.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德里通勤者出行行为和偏好的回顾性横断面观察研究:建筑环境、个人态度和社会经济因素的影响
本研究利用 2005 年至 2019 年在四个社区收集的回顾性横截面数据,对影响德里工作人口出行行为的因素进行了研究。研究提供了实证证据,说明随着时间的推移,出行方式的选择是如何随着建筑环境和社会经济条件的变化而演变的。通过基于地理信息系统的分析,评估了建筑环境的时间变化对出行行为的影响。结果显示,2005 年至 2019 年间,人们对私人交通方式的依赖增加了 21%,其中四轮车的使用率增幅最大。相反,公共汽车的使用率下降了 32%,原因有很多,包括过度拥挤、卫生问题和认为的可靠性问题。然而,在 2019 年,康诺特广场的公交车使用率最高,达到 28%,这归因于其公交车站密度高,而各街区地铁设施的加强则使地铁总体乘客量增加了 20%。多项式逻辑回归分析确定了出行行为的主要社会经济决定因素,包括年龄、性别、收入、车辆拥有量和通勤态度。2005 年,两轮车相对于公共汽车的偏好主要受车辆拥有量(O.R.:620.95)、性别(O.R.:4.20)和收入(O.R.:1.28)的影响。到 2019 年,通勤态度(ProPV)与车辆拥有量(O.R.:136.72)、ProPV(O.R.:21.41)和收入(O.R.:2.14)一起成为重要因素。在汽车使用方面也观察到了类似的趋势,这表明随着时间的推移,通勤者的行为和态度对出行选择的影响越来越大。这些发现强调了发展和改善德里交通系统的重要政策影响,为面临类似挑战的其他城市提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Who Gets What? A user perspective on initial credit allocation in Tradable Mobility Credit Schemes Optimal deposit-return strategies for the recycling of spent electric automobile battery: Manufacturer, retailer, or consumer The influence mechanisms of transport infrastructure on China’s domestic trade: Evidence from trade weight data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1