Adapting rapid ethnographic research in an evolving emergency: Generalizable lessons in resilience

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Annals of Anthropological Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1111/napa.12220
Elisa J. Sobo, Emily K. Brunson, Stephanie McClure, Elizabeth Cartwright, Meg Jordan, Stephen B. Thomas, Monica Schoch-Spana
{"title":"Adapting rapid ethnographic research in an evolving emergency: Generalizable lessons in resilience","authors":"Elisa J. Sobo,&nbsp;Emily K. Brunson,&nbsp;Stephanie McClure,&nbsp;Elizabeth Cartwright,&nbsp;Meg Jordan,&nbsp;Stephen B. Thomas,&nbsp;Monica Schoch-Spana","doi":"10.1111/napa.12220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To ensure the real-world utility of emergency ethnographic research, plans must evolve as circumstances shift. The CommuniVax coalition's work provides a case study of this scenario. Using rapid ethnographic interviews, focus groups, and other methods, the six local CommuniVax teams sought to comprehend and improve COVID-19 vaccine access and uptake. To this end, they responded nimbly to varying community priorities, the pandemic's shifting nature, evolving bureaucratic mechanisms, and political fluctuations. This paper provides specific examples of such instances, highlighting some of the critical decision points that emerged, demonstrating the flexibility needed for effective rapid community-based research, reiterating the importance of a bottom-up orientation, and elaborating on the trade-offs that occurred in decision-making regarding how best to move forward. This discussion is relevant to tackling any narrowly defined research problem, emergency-related or not, as well as research seeking actionable answers to specific questions that have practical bearing on human lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"48 2","pages":"186-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.12220","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.12220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To ensure the real-world utility of emergency ethnographic research, plans must evolve as circumstances shift. The CommuniVax coalition's work provides a case study of this scenario. Using rapid ethnographic interviews, focus groups, and other methods, the six local CommuniVax teams sought to comprehend and improve COVID-19 vaccine access and uptake. To this end, they responded nimbly to varying community priorities, the pandemic's shifting nature, evolving bureaucratic mechanisms, and political fluctuations. This paper provides specific examples of such instances, highlighting some of the critical decision points that emerged, demonstrating the flexibility needed for effective rapid community-based research, reiterating the importance of a bottom-up orientation, and elaborating on the trade-offs that occurred in decision-making regarding how best to move forward. This discussion is relevant to tackling any narrowly defined research problem, emergency-related or not, as well as research seeking actionable answers to specific questions that have practical bearing on human lives.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不断变化的紧急情况下调整快速人种学研究:可推广的抗灾经验教训
为了确保紧急人种学研究在现实世界中的实用性,计划必须随着情况的变化而变化。CommuniVax 联盟的工作为这种情况提供了一个案例研究。通过快速人种学访谈、焦点小组及其他方法,六个当地的 CommuniVax 团队试图了解并改善 COVID-19 疫苗的接种和使用情况。为此,他们对不同的社区优先事项、大流行病的性质变化、官僚机制的演变以及政治波动做出了灵活的反应。本文提供了此类情况的具体实例,强调了出现的一些关键决策点,展示了以社区为基础开展有效快速研究所需的灵活性,重申了自下而上导向的重要性,并详细阐述了在决策过程中就如何以最佳方式向前推进所进行的权衡。这一讨论适用于解决任何狭义的研究问题,无论是否与紧急情况有关,也适用于寻求对人类生活有实际影响的具体问题的可行答案的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Ethnography beyond thick data Diversity Human centered design for applied anthropology Applying up: How ethnographers powered public health changes in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1