Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid as an alternative for prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL): a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/BHLM2937
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir, Reza Mohammadi Farsani, Amirreza Shamshirgaran, Navid Ahamdi, Hossein Chivaee, Rahil Mashhadi, Hossein Dialameh, Alireza Pakdel, Fardin Asgari, Parisa Zahmatkesh, Alireza Khajavi, Ziba Aghsaeifard, Abdolreza Mohammadi
{"title":"Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid as an alternative for prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL): a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir, Reza Mohammadi Farsani, Amirreza Shamshirgaran, Navid Ahamdi, Hossein Chivaee, Rahil Mashhadi, Hossein Dialameh, Alireza Pakdel, Fardin Asgari, Parisa Zahmatkesh, Alireza Khajavi, Ziba Aghsaeifard, Abdolreza Mohammadi","doi":"10.62347/BHLM2937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used to prevent infections and complications during surgeries. In this study inflammatory responses and infectious complications after utilizing antibiotic-loaded irrigation compared with intravenous (IV) prophylactic antibiotics. Eighty-eight participants with ureteral stones enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated into two groups, namely \"standard\" with 45 participants, and \"antibiotic-loaded\" with 43 participants. The \"standard\" group received standard normal saline irrigation with 1 gram of IV ceftriaxone 30 minutes before in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL), while the \"antibiotic-loaded\" group received ceftriaxone-added irrigation fluid and did not receive any IV antibiotics. The laboratory tests, including Complete Blood Count (CBC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), venous blood gas (VBG), IL-6, creatinine, sodium, potassium, SIRS score, and urine culture were recorded. The continuous variables are described using either mean (standard deviation (SD)) or median (interquartile range (IQR)) and the t-test and Mann-Whitney test are used to infer them. The discrete variables are reported as numbers (percentages) and the Chi-squared test is applied to them. Statistical analyses were performed by the SPSS software (V.26, IBM) with a considering significance criterion of 0.05. Statistically differences were not found in postoperative inflammatory and infectious complications among the two groups (P>0.05) including SIRS score (P=0.385), WBC (P=0.589), IL-6 (P=0.365), ESR (P=0.171), CRP (P=0.279), Platelet (P=0.501), positive urine culture (P=0.922), and post-operative fever (P=0.162). Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid was as safe and effective as IV ceftriaxone in TUL and could be a reasonable alternative for IV antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"12 5","pages":"279-287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/BHLM2937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used to prevent infections and complications during surgeries. In this study inflammatory responses and infectious complications after utilizing antibiotic-loaded irrigation compared with intravenous (IV) prophylactic antibiotics. Eighty-eight participants with ureteral stones enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated into two groups, namely "standard" with 45 participants, and "antibiotic-loaded" with 43 participants. The "standard" group received standard normal saline irrigation with 1 gram of IV ceftriaxone 30 minutes before in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL), while the "antibiotic-loaded" group received ceftriaxone-added irrigation fluid and did not receive any IV antibiotics. The laboratory tests, including Complete Blood Count (CBC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), venous blood gas (VBG), IL-6, creatinine, sodium, potassium, SIRS score, and urine culture were recorded. The continuous variables are described using either mean (standard deviation (SD)) or median (interquartile range (IQR)) and the t-test and Mann-Whitney test are used to infer them. The discrete variables are reported as numbers (percentages) and the Chi-squared test is applied to them. Statistical analyses were performed by the SPSS software (V.26, IBM) with a considering significance criterion of 0.05. Statistically differences were not found in postoperative inflammatory and infectious complications among the two groups (P>0.05) including SIRS score (P=0.385), WBC (P=0.589), IL-6 (P=0.365), ESR (P=0.171), CRP (P=0.279), Platelet (P=0.501), positive urine culture (P=0.922), and post-operative fever (P=0.162). Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid was as safe and effective as IV ceftriaxone in TUL and could be a reasonable alternative for IV antibiotics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经尿道输尿管碎石术(TUL)中使用含抗生素的冲洗液替代预防性静脉注射抗生素:随机对照试验。
预防性抗生素通常用于预防手术中的感染和并发症。在这项研究中,使用抗生素灌注与静脉注射预防性抗生素后的炎症反应和感染并发症进行了比较。88名输尿管结石患者参加了这项前瞻性随机对照试验。参与者被分为两组,即 "标准 "组(45 人)和 "含抗生素 "组(43 人)。标准 "组接受标准生理盐水灌洗,并在经尿道输尿管碎石术(TUL)前30分钟静脉滴注1克头孢曲松,而 "抗生素添加 "组接受添加头孢曲松的灌洗液,不接受任何静脉滴注抗生素。实验室检查包括全血细胞计数(CBC)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、静脉血气(VBG)、IL-6、肌酐、钠、钾、SIRS 评分和尿培养。连续变量采用均值(标准差(SD))或中位数(四分位间距(IQR))进行描述,并使用 t 检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验进行推断。离散变量以数字(百分比)表示,并采用卡方检验。统计分析由 SPSS 软件(V.26,IBM)进行,显著性标准为 0.05。两组患者在术后炎症和感染并发症方面无统计学差异(P>0.05),包括 SIRS 评分(P=0.385)、白细胞(P=0.589)、IL-6(P=0.365)、血沉(P=0.171)、CRP(P=0.279)、血小板(P=0.501)、尿培养阳性(P=0.922)和术后发热(P=0.162)。在 TUL 中使用含抗生素的冲洗液与静脉注射头孢曲松一样安全有效,可以作为静脉注射抗生素的合理替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal: a safe and effective method during the COVID-19 pandemic. Impact of cell plasticity on prostate tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic response. Impact of race-based calculations of eGFR on the management of muscle invasive bladder cancer. SOX2 control activation of dormant prostate cancer cells in bone metastases by promoting CCNE2 gene expression. Construction and evaluation of a prognostic model for metabolism-related genes in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma using TCGA database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1