Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal: a safe and effective method during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/HSPG8492
Jiangcun Silang, Yalong Gu, Ciren Gazang, Peichen Duan, Xinlong Tian, Feng Luo, Jinlong Wang, Lei Zheng, Zhiqiang Du, Hao Yi, Feng Wang, Yichang Hao, Baopeng Zhang
{"title":"Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal: a safe and effective method during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Jiangcun Silang, Yalong Gu, Ciren Gazang, Peichen Duan, Xinlong Tian, Feng Luo, Jinlong Wang, Lei Zheng, Zhiqiang Du, Hao Yi, Feng Wang, Yichang Hao, Baopeng Zhang","doi":"10.62347/HSPG8492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ureteral stent must be removed within a certain period, usually performed under the cystoscope. However, cystoscopic operations procedures carry risks such as urethral injury, hemorrhage, and infection. This study aimed to implement a cystoscope-free method for ureteral stent removal during the COVID-19 pandemic to mitigate the complications associated with cystoscopy, reduce the risk of cross-infection, and conserve medical resources and time. We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent ureteral stent removal at our institution between August and December 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic. A simple device, consisting of an F6 or F8 gastric tube with the front end passing through a 3-0 Prolene line was utilized to extract the double-J stents without cystoscopic assistance. The gastric tube with the line was inserted into the urethra to drain urine from the bladder, saline was injected into the bladder, and the gastric tube was rotated with the line for 4-5 weeks, after which the stent tube was removed by gently pulling it outward. Perioperative characteristics assessed included operation time, pain score, stent removal success rate, postoperative complications, and reasons for stent removal failure. Among the 33 cases included in the study, 17 were males and 16 were females; 20 patients were older than 14 years while 13 were younger. Cystoscope-free stent removal was performed in all cases, with a success rate of 96.9% (32 patients), including 25 cases (78.1%) completed in one operation, four cases (12.5%) in two operations, and three cases (9.4%) in three operations. The mean extubation time was 4.3 ± 1.5 minutes, and the average pain score was 2.1 ± 0.7. No serious postoperative complications were noted. Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal can be executed by a single physician, demonstrating simplicity, safety, effectiveness, and fewer complications. This method reduces the risk of cross-infection and conserves medical resources and time during the COVID-19 pandemic, making it suitable for both adults and children.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"12 6","pages":"367-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/HSPG8492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ureteral stent must be removed within a certain period, usually performed under the cystoscope. However, cystoscopic operations procedures carry risks such as urethral injury, hemorrhage, and infection. This study aimed to implement a cystoscope-free method for ureteral stent removal during the COVID-19 pandemic to mitigate the complications associated with cystoscopy, reduce the risk of cross-infection, and conserve medical resources and time. We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent ureteral stent removal at our institution between August and December 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic. A simple device, consisting of an F6 or F8 gastric tube with the front end passing through a 3-0 Prolene line was utilized to extract the double-J stents without cystoscopic assistance. The gastric tube with the line was inserted into the urethra to drain urine from the bladder, saline was injected into the bladder, and the gastric tube was rotated with the line for 4-5 weeks, after which the stent tube was removed by gently pulling it outward. Perioperative characteristics assessed included operation time, pain score, stent removal success rate, postoperative complications, and reasons for stent removal failure. Among the 33 cases included in the study, 17 were males and 16 were females; 20 patients were older than 14 years while 13 were younger. Cystoscope-free stent removal was performed in all cases, with a success rate of 96.9% (32 patients), including 25 cases (78.1%) completed in one operation, four cases (12.5%) in two operations, and three cases (9.4%) in three operations. The mean extubation time was 4.3 ± 1.5 minutes, and the average pain score was 2.1 ± 0.7. No serious postoperative complications were noted. Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal can be executed by a single physician, demonstrating simplicity, safety, effectiveness, and fewer complications. This method reduces the risk of cross-infection and conserves medical resources and time during the COVID-19 pandemic, making it suitable for both adults and children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无膀胱镜输尿管支架移除术:新冠肺炎大流行期间一种安全有效的方法
输尿管支架必须在一定时间内取出,通常在膀胱镜下进行。然而,膀胱镜手术过程有尿道损伤、出血和感染等风险。本研究旨在实现新型冠状病毒病疫情期间输尿管支架移除无需膀胱镜的方法,以减轻膀胱镜相关并发症,降低交叉感染风险,节约医疗资源和时间。我们回顾性分析了2022年8月至12月COVID-19大流行期间在我院接受输尿管支架移除术的33例患者。采用一种简单的装置,包括F6或F8胃管,前端通过3-0 Prolene线,在没有膀胱镜辅助的情况下取出双j支架。将带线的胃管插入尿道,排出膀胱内尿液,膀胱内注射生理盐水,胃管随线旋转4-5周后,轻轻向外拉出支架管。围手术期特征评估包括手术时间、疼痛评分、支架取出成功率、术后并发症和支架取出失败的原因。在纳入研究的33例患者中,男性17例,女性16例;年龄大于14岁的20例,年龄小于14岁的13例。所有病例均行膀胱镜下支架取出术,成功率为96.9%(32例),其中一次手术完成25例(78.1%),两次手术完成4例(12.5%),三次手术完成3例(9.4%)。平均拔管时间4.3±1.5分钟,平均疼痛评分2.1±0.7分。术后未见严重并发症。无膀胱镜输尿管支架移除术可由一名医生完成,具有简单、安全、有效和并发症少的特点。这种方法降低了COVID-19大流行期间的交叉感染风险,节省了医疗资源和时间,适用于成人和儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal: a safe and effective method during the COVID-19 pandemic. Impact of cell plasticity on prostate tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic response. Impact of race-based calculations of eGFR on the management of muscle invasive bladder cancer. SOX2 control activation of dormant prostate cancer cells in bone metastases by promoting CCNE2 gene expression. Construction and evaluation of a prognostic model for metabolism-related genes in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma using TCGA database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1