Minimum Normalized Cycling Cadence to Increase Post-Cycling Gait Velocity.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.3390/jfmk9040235
Nitu Lama, Christopher J Keating, Paul T Donahue, Nuno Oliveira, Tanner A Thorsen
{"title":"Minimum Normalized Cycling Cadence to Increase Post-Cycling Gait Velocity.","authors":"Nitu Lama, Christopher J Keating, Paul T Donahue, Nuno Oliveira, Tanner A Thorsen","doi":"10.3390/jfmk9040235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has shown that increasing cycling cadence can result in improved post-cycling gait velocity. However, the specific threshold of cycling cadence required to bring about clinically meaningful changes in gait velocity remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the minimum increment in cycling cadence that would lead to a significant improvement in post-cycling gait velocity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 42 young adults participated in our study and were randomly assigned to one of three groups: TEN, TWENTY, and THIRTY. Each group was assigned to cycle at a cadence at the corresponding percentage higher than the participant's self-selected gait cadence. Each participant engaged in a 15-min cycling session at their respective assigned cycling cadence. Before and after cycling, participants completed a 10-meter walk test while spatiotemporal parameters of gait, ground reaction forces, lower extremity kinematics, and kinetics were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-way ANOVA revealed no statistically significant changes in spatiotemporal, ground reaction force, kinematics, and kinetics variables pre- and post-cycling. However, there were both statistically significant (F(2,41) = 3.794, <i>p</i> = 0.031, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.604) and clinically meaningful changes (0.07 m/s) in post-cycling gait velocity in the THIRTY group only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This suggests that a cycling cadence of 30% or higher is the minimum requirement to produce a clinically significant improvement in gait velocity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9040235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has shown that increasing cycling cadence can result in improved post-cycling gait velocity. However, the specific threshold of cycling cadence required to bring about clinically meaningful changes in gait velocity remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the minimum increment in cycling cadence that would lead to a significant improvement in post-cycling gait velocity.

Methods: A total of 42 young adults participated in our study and were randomly assigned to one of three groups: TEN, TWENTY, and THIRTY. Each group was assigned to cycle at a cadence at the corresponding percentage higher than the participant's self-selected gait cadence. Each participant engaged in a 15-min cycling session at their respective assigned cycling cadence. Before and after cycling, participants completed a 10-meter walk test while spatiotemporal parameters of gait, ground reaction forces, lower extremity kinematics, and kinetics were recorded.

Results: One-way ANOVA revealed no statistically significant changes in spatiotemporal, ground reaction force, kinematics, and kinetics variables pre- and post-cycling. However, there were both statistically significant (F(2,41) = 3.794, p = 0.031, η2 = 0.604) and clinically meaningful changes (0.07 m/s) in post-cycling gait velocity in the THIRTY group only.

Conclusions: This suggests that a cycling cadence of 30% or higher is the minimum requirement to produce a clinically significant improvement in gait velocity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高骑车后步态速度的最小归一化骑行速度
背景:以往的研究表明,增加骑行步频可提高骑行后的步速。然而,对步速产生有临床意义的变化所需的具体骑行步频阈值仍然未知。本研究旨在确定骑车步频的最小增量,以显著改善骑车后的步速:共有 42 名年轻人参加了我们的研究,他们被随机分配到三个组中的一组:十人组、二十人组和三十人组。每组的骑行步速均高于参与者自选步速的相应百分比。每位参与者按照各自指定的骑行步频进行 15 分钟的骑行训练。骑车前后,参与者完成 10 米步行测试,同时记录步态时空参数、地面反作用力、下肢运动学和动力学参数:单因素方差分析显示,骑自行车前后的时空、地面反作用力、运动学和动力学变量在统计学上没有显著变化。然而,仅在 THIRTY 组中,骑车后步速的变化具有统计学意义(F(2,41) = 3.794,p = 0.031,η2 = 0.604)和临床意义(0.07 米/秒):这表明,30% 或更高的骑行步频是对步速产生有临床意义的改善的最低要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Rotational Malalignment Following Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fractures on Patients' Functional Outcomes: A Prospective Study. Enhancing Physical and Cognitive Efficiency in Elderly Individuals at Risk for Dementia Using Whole-Body Electrostimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gender Differences in Head and Neck Posture Among Smartphone Users While Walking: Insights from Field Observations in Taipei. Gender Differences for the Relative Age Effect on Physical Skills and Emotional Intelligence in Child Volleyball and Soccer Athletes. Impact of Four Weeks of TOGU Training on Neuromuscular Control and Golf Swing Performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1