4CMenB Breadth of Immune Response, Immunogenicity, and Safety: Results From a Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Observer Blind Study in Adolescents and Young Adults.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae638
Terry Nolan, Chiranjiwi Bhusal, Jiří Beran, Mark Bloch, Benhur S Cetin, Ener C Dinleyici, Daniel Dražan, Satu Kokko, Susanna Koski, Outi Laajalahti, Joanne M Langley, Mika Rämet, Peter C Richmond, Peter Silas, Bruce Tapiero, Florence Tiong, Mary Tipton, Benita Ukkonen, Betul Ulukol, Maria Lattanzi, Mauro Trapani, Arnold Willemsen, Daniela Toneatto
{"title":"4CMenB Breadth of Immune Response, Immunogenicity, and Safety: Results From a Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Observer Blind Study in Adolescents and Young Adults.","authors":"Terry Nolan, Chiranjiwi Bhusal, Jiří Beran, Mark Bloch, Benhur S Cetin, Ener C Dinleyici, Daniel Dražan, Satu Kokko, Susanna Koski, Outi Laajalahti, Joanne M Langley, Mika Rämet, Peter C Richmond, Peter Silas, Bruce Tapiero, Florence Tiong, Mary Tipton, Benita Ukkonen, Betul Ulukol, Maria Lattanzi, Mauro Trapani, Arnold Willemsen, Daniela Toneatto","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) strains are highly diverse. Breadth of immune response for the MenB vaccine, 4CMenB, administered at 0-2, 0-6, or 0-2-6 months, was demonstrated by endogenous complement-human serum bactericidal antibody (enc-hSBA) assay against an epidemiologically relevant panel of 110 MenB strains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a phase 3 trial, 3651 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomized 5:5:9:1 to receive 4CMenB (0-6 schedule), 4CMenB (0-2-6 schedule), investigational MenABCWY vaccine, or control MenACWY-CRM vaccine. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and demonstrate breadth of immune response by enc-hSBA assay against the MenB strain panel using test-based (percentage of samples without bactericidal activity against strains after 4CMenB vs control vaccination) and responder-based (percentage of participants whose postvaccination sera kill ≥70% strains) approaches. Success was demonstrated with 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) lower limit >65%. Immunogenicity was assessed by traditional hSBA assay against four indicator strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breadth of immune response (test-based) was 78.7% (97.5% CI, 77.2-80.1), 81.8% (80.4-83.1), 83.2% (81.9-84.4) for the 0-2, 0-6, and 0-2-6 schedules, respectively, and (responder-based) 84.8% (81.8-87.5), 89.8% (87.2-92.0), and 93.4% (91.2-95.2), respectively. No clinically relevant differences in immunogenicity were observed across schedules. 4CMenB was well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2-dose (0-2, 0-6) 4CMenB schedules met predefined criteria for success for both breadth of immune response endpoints against a diverse MenB strain panel, had comparable immunogenicity, and safety in line with the established 4CMenB safety profile. The 3-dose schedule provided no additional immunological benefit, supporting use of the 4CMenB 0-2 schedule.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"11 11","pages":"ofae638"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) strains are highly diverse. Breadth of immune response for the MenB vaccine, 4CMenB, administered at 0-2, 0-6, or 0-2-6 months, was demonstrated by endogenous complement-human serum bactericidal antibody (enc-hSBA) assay against an epidemiologically relevant panel of 110 MenB strains.

Methods: In a phase 3 trial, 3651 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomized 5:5:9:1 to receive 4CMenB (0-6 schedule), 4CMenB (0-2-6 schedule), investigational MenABCWY vaccine, or control MenACWY-CRM vaccine. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and demonstrate breadth of immune response by enc-hSBA assay against the MenB strain panel using test-based (percentage of samples without bactericidal activity against strains after 4CMenB vs control vaccination) and responder-based (percentage of participants whose postvaccination sera kill ≥70% strains) approaches. Success was demonstrated with 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) lower limit >65%. Immunogenicity was assessed by traditional hSBA assay against four indicator strains.

Results: Breadth of immune response (test-based) was 78.7% (97.5% CI, 77.2-80.1), 81.8% (80.4-83.1), 83.2% (81.9-84.4) for the 0-2, 0-6, and 0-2-6 schedules, respectively, and (responder-based) 84.8% (81.8-87.5), 89.8% (87.2-92.0), and 93.4% (91.2-95.2), respectively. No clinically relevant differences in immunogenicity were observed across schedules. 4CMenB was well tolerated.

Conclusions: The 2-dose (0-2, 0-6) 4CMenB schedules met predefined criteria for success for both breadth of immune response endpoints against a diverse MenB strain panel, had comparable immunogenicity, and safety in line with the established 4CMenB safety profile. The 3-dose schedule provided no additional immunological benefit, supporting use of the 4CMenB 0-2 schedule.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4CMenB 的免疫反应广度、免疫原性和安全性:青少年和年轻人的 3 期随机对照观察盲法研究结果。
背景:脑膜炎球菌 B 血清群 (MenB) 菌株高度多样化。通过内源性补体-人血清杀菌抗体(enc-hSBA)检测,针对流行病学相关的 110 株 MenB 株系,证明了在 0-2、0-6 或 0-2-6 个月接种 MenB 疫苗 4CMenB 的免疫反应广度:在一项3期试验中,3651名10至25岁的健康参与者以5:5:9:1的比例随机接受4CMenB(0-6计划)、4CMenB(0-2-6计划)、研究性MenABCWY疫苗或对照组MenACWY-CRM疫苗。研究的主要目的是评估安全性,并通过 enc-hSBA 检测证明针对 MenB 株系的免疫反应的广泛性,采用的方法包括基于试验的方法(接种 4CMenB 与对照疫苗后对菌株无杀菌活性的样本百分比)和基于应答者的方法(接种后血清杀灭菌株≥70% 的参与者百分比)。双侧 97.5% 置信区间 (CI) 下限大于 65% 即为成功。免疫原性是通过传统的 hSBA 检测法对四种指标菌株进行评估的:0-2、0-6和0-2-6方案的免疫反应广度(基于试验)分别为78.7%(97.5% CI,77.2-80.1)、81.8%(80.4-83.1)和83.2%(81.9-84.4),而(基于应答者)分别为84.8%(81.8-87.5)、89.8%(87.2-92.0)和93.4%(91.2-95.2)。不同疗程的免疫原性没有临床相关性差异。4CMenB的耐受性良好:结论:2剂量(0-2、0-6)4CMenB方案在针对不同MenB菌株的免疫应答终点广度方面均达到了预定的成功标准,具有可比的免疫原性和安全性,符合已确立的4CMenB安全性特征。三剂量方案没有带来额外的免疫益处,因此支持使用 4CMenB 0-2 剂量方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
When Less Is More: Volume Considerations in the Treatment of Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis. Randomized Phase 3 Comparison of a 2-Dose and 3-Dose Regimen of a Detoxified Toxin A/B Clostridioides difficile Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older. Sustained Improvement in Antibiotic Prescribing Among Private Practice Dentists Following Antibiotic Stewardship Education and Dashboard Implementation. The Impact of MOUD Initiation in Patients With Injection Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis. Preexisting Humoral Immunity Against Seasonal Coronaviruses Enhances Antibody Responses on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1