Performance of respiratory therapy programs in the Saudi Respiratory Care Licensure Examination: Cross-sectional national results.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and health Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1177/02601060241300568
Hajed M Al-Otaibi
{"title":"Performance of respiratory therapy programs in the Saudi Respiratory Care Licensure Examination: Cross-sectional national results.","authors":"Hajed M Al-Otaibi","doi":"10.1177/02601060241300568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Recently, there has been an increase in the number of respiratory therapy programs. However, a national consensus is lacking in intended learning objectives, appropriate teaching methods, and suitable assessment tools. Consequently, variations in outcomes among these programs are expected. <b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the performance of respiratory therapy programs in the Saudi Respiratory Care Licensure Examination (SRCLE). <b>Methods:</b> The SRCLE data were retrieved from the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) database as of 18 March 2024. The datasets included the number of applicants, overall passing rates, maximum scores, and average scores. Data were categorized based on academic institution, including the type of university (governmental or private), nationality, gender, passing status, number of exam attempts, and year of examinations. Performance comparisons were conducted based on gender and year of examinations. <b>Results:</b> The database from the SCFHS shows that 1305 examinees underwent the SRCLEs from the second quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2024. Females accounted for 46% of the total, while Saudi examinees made up 97% of all applicants. The overall passing rate stood at 96%. The average score was 613, with the highest score recorded being 740. Notably, there was no significant difference in performance between males and females (p = 0.299). However, there was a considerable variance in performance based on the year of examination (p = 0.024). <b>Conclusion:</b> The existing data demonstrates that most respiratory therapy programs perform well in SRCLE. We found no significant differences based on gender or the type of school attended. Additionally, the performance of these programs has remained consistent over the years.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060241300568"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241300568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently, there has been an increase in the number of respiratory therapy programs. However, a national consensus is lacking in intended learning objectives, appropriate teaching methods, and suitable assessment tools. Consequently, variations in outcomes among these programs are expected. Aim: To evaluate the performance of respiratory therapy programs in the Saudi Respiratory Care Licensure Examination (SRCLE). Methods: The SRCLE data were retrieved from the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) database as of 18 March 2024. The datasets included the number of applicants, overall passing rates, maximum scores, and average scores. Data were categorized based on academic institution, including the type of university (governmental or private), nationality, gender, passing status, number of exam attempts, and year of examinations. Performance comparisons were conducted based on gender and year of examinations. Results: The database from the SCFHS shows that 1305 examinees underwent the SRCLEs from the second quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2024. Females accounted for 46% of the total, while Saudi examinees made up 97% of all applicants. The overall passing rate stood at 96%. The average score was 613, with the highest score recorded being 740. Notably, there was no significant difference in performance between males and females (p = 0.299). However, there was a considerable variance in performance based on the year of examination (p = 0.024). Conclusion: The existing data demonstrates that most respiratory therapy programs perform well in SRCLE. We found no significant differences based on gender or the type of school attended. Additionally, the performance of these programs has remained consistent over the years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸治疗专业在沙特呼吸护理执照考试中的表现:全国横断面结果。
背景:最近,呼吸治疗课程的数量有所增加。然而,在预定的学习目标、适当的教学方法和合适的评估工具方面缺乏全国性的共识。因此,预计这些课程的成果会存在差异。目的:评估呼吸治疗专业在沙特呼吸护理执照考试(SRCLE)中的表现。方法:检索 SRCLE 数据:从沙特卫生专业委员会(SCFHS)数据库中检索截至 2024 年 3 月 18 日的 SRCLE 数据。数据集包括申请人数、总体通过率、最高分和平均分。数据根据学术机构进行分类,包括大学类型(公立或私立)、国籍、性别、通过情况、考试次数和考试年份。根据性别和考试年份进行成绩比较。结果SCFHS 数据库显示,从 2021 年第二季度到 2024 年第一季度,共有 1305 名考生参加了 SRCLE 考试。女性占总人数的 46%,而沙特籍考生占所有申请人的 97%。总体通过率为 96%。平均分为 613 分,最高分为 740 分。值得注意的是,男女生的成绩没有明显差异(p = 0.299)。不过,考试年份不同,成绩差异很大(p = 0.024)。结论现有数据表明,大多数呼吸治疗专业在 SRCLE 考试中表现良好。我们没有发现因性别或就读学校类型而产生的明显差异。此外,这些专业的成绩多年来一直保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
Performance of respiratory therapy programs in the Saudi Respiratory Care Licensure Examination: Cross-sectional national results. Adults perceive similar ultra-processed and minimally processed foods as having different levels of healthfulness: Development of stimuli for an ultra-processed food-related implicit association task. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of vitamin A supplementation programs in Africa: A systematic review. Personalized nutrition after discharge for pancreatic surgery: A study protocol. Creatine and sleep habits and disorders in the general population aged 16 years and over: NHANES 2007-2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1