Outpatient diabetes management influences glycemic control for critically ill patients during nutrition support: A retrospective observational study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1002/ncp.11244
Roland N Dickerson, Allison R McLeod, Alison E Stonecipher, Julie E Farrar, Saskya Byerly, Dina M Filiberto, Peter E Fischer
{"title":"Outpatient diabetes management influences glycemic control for critically ill patients during nutrition support: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Roland N Dickerson, Allison R McLeod, Alison E Stonecipher, Julie E Farrar, Saskya Byerly, Dina M Filiberto, Peter E Fischer","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine whether successful outpatient management of diabetes, as assessed by hemoglobin A1c (Hgb A1c), influences inpatient glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients, aged >17 years, admitted to the trauma intensive care unit, who received continuous nutrition therapy, and exhibited a blood glucose concentration (BG) > 149 mg/dl or 8.3 mmol/L were retrospectively evaluated. Controlled diabetes mellitus (DM-C) was defined as a history of DM and a Hgb A1c < 7%. Uncontrolled DM (DM-U) was defined as an Hgb A1c ≥ 7%. Those without a history of DM and an Hgb A1c < 6.5% were classified as without DM (no DM). Patients were managed via intravenous regular human insulin (RHI) infusion or subcutaneous neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin with intravenous sliding scale RHI (SSI) or SSI alone. Target BG range was 70-149 mg/dl (3.9-8.3 mmol/L). Glycemic control was evaluated for the first 7 days of nutrition therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients with DM-C, 24 with DM-U, and 32 with no DM were evaluated. Despite no difference in carbohydrate intake, those with DM-U received 70 ± 54 units daily vs 15 ± 16 and 14 ± 18 units daily for the DM-C and no DM groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Target BG range was achieved for 11 ± 5 h/day vs 14 ± 7 and 16 ± 6 h/day, respectively (P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early identification of DM-U would assist in recognizing patients with difficulty achieving glycemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"134-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether successful outpatient management of diabetes, as assessed by hemoglobin A1c (Hgb A1c), influences inpatient glycemic control.

Methods: Adult patients, aged >17 years, admitted to the trauma intensive care unit, who received continuous nutrition therapy, and exhibited a blood glucose concentration (BG) > 149 mg/dl or 8.3 mmol/L were retrospectively evaluated. Controlled diabetes mellitus (DM-C) was defined as a history of DM and a Hgb A1c < 7%. Uncontrolled DM (DM-U) was defined as an Hgb A1c ≥ 7%. Those without a history of DM and an Hgb A1c < 6.5% were classified as without DM (no DM). Patients were managed via intravenous regular human insulin (RHI) infusion or subcutaneous neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin with intravenous sliding scale RHI (SSI) or SSI alone. Target BG range was 70-149 mg/dl (3.9-8.3 mmol/L). Glycemic control was evaluated for the first 7 days of nutrition therapy.

Results: Twenty-two patients with DM-C, 24 with DM-U, and 32 with no DM were evaluated. Despite no difference in carbohydrate intake, those with DM-U received 70 ± 54 units daily vs 15 ± 16 and 14 ± 18 units daily for the DM-C and no DM groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Target BG range was achieved for 11 ± 5 h/day vs 14 ± 7 and 16 ± 6 h/day, respectively (P = 0.01).

Conclusion: Early identification of DM-U would assist in recognizing patients with difficulty achieving glycemic control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊糖尿病管理对营养支持期间重症患者血糖控制的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:本研究旨在确定以血红蛋白A1c(Hgb A1c)为评估指标的糖尿病门诊管理成功与否会影响住院患者的血糖控制:对年龄大于 17 岁、入住创伤重症监护室、接受持续营养治疗、血糖浓度 (BG) > 149 mg/dl 或 8.3 mmol/L 的成人患者进行了回顾性评估。受控糖尿病(DM-C)定义为有糖尿病史且血红蛋白 A1c 结果:评估了 22 名 DM-C 患者、24 名 DM-U 患者和 32 名非 DM 患者。尽管碳水化合物摄入量没有差异,但 DM-U 组患者每天摄入 70±54 个单位,而 DM-C 组和非 DM 组患者每天分别摄入 15±16 个单位和 14±18 个单位(P = 0.001)。达到目标血糖范围的时间分别为 11 ± 5 小时/天与 14 ± 7 小时/天和 16 ± 6 小时/天(P = 0.01):结论:早期识别 DM-U 将有助于识别难以实现血糖控制的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
50 years later: Where have we been and where are we going? A deeper look into the history of refeeding syndrome. Reply to the comment on "Value of the modified Patient- Generated Subjective Global Assessment in indicating the need for nutrition intervention and predicting overall survival in patients with malignant tumors in at least two organs." Nutrition and outcomes in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An observational cohort study. Prevalence, predictive factors, and outcomes of refeeding syndrome among medically critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1