Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on the Change over Time in the Anticholinergic Load in Geriatric Patients: The SADP-Antichol Study.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12060162
Grégoire Delvallée, Lisa Mondet, Chloé Cornille, Guillaume Deschasse, Aurélie Lenglet
{"title":"Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on the Change over Time in the Anticholinergic Load in Geriatric Patients: The SADP-Antichol Study.","authors":"Grégoire Delvallée, Lisa Mondet, Chloé Cornille, Guillaume Deschasse, Aurélie Lenglet","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12060162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anticholinergic drugs can cause adverse events (AEs) in older adults. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can detect prescriptions with a high anticholinergic load. Our starting hypothesis was that the anticholinergic load could be reduced by combining a CDSS with a strategy for generating pharmacist interventions. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of this combination on the change over time in the anticholinergic load in hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-centre study was divided into two 6-week periods. During the interventional period, a pharmacist analyzed the alerts generated by the CDSS for 30 targeted anticholinergic drugs and decided whether to issue a pharmacist intervention. A control period corresponds to standard care. The primary endpoint of the study is the delta of the anticholinergic load between the alert and hospital discharge; the secondary endpoint is the incidence of anticholinergic adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 144 alerts generated, 87 were considered to be relevant (36 in the interventional period and 51 in the control period). A significant difference was observed between the delta anticholinergic load between the experimental and control periods (1.61 vs. 0.67, <i>p</i>-value = 0.0115). For the targeted drugs (<i>n</i> = 94) over the 87 alerts, 46.8% were for antihistamines and 21.3% were for desloratadine. Of the 36 pharmacist interventions sent by the pharmacist, 19 (52.8%) were accepted. The most deprescribed drug class was the antihistamine class (<i>n</i> = 7), and the most deprescribed drug was amitriptyline (<i>n</i> = 5). Among these 87 patients with alerts, the correlation between the anticholinergic load and the number of AEs was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.887). The most common AE affecting the peripheral nervous system was constipation (28.6%), and the most common AE affecting the central nervous system was confusion (29.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results showed that the combination of specific CDSS rules with pharmacist-mediated risk management procedures could further reduce the anticholinergic load in hospitalized older adults, relative to routine care. It remains to be determined whether this reduction in the anticholinergic load has an impact on the incidence of peripheral and central anticholinergic AEs, and thus the health of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12060162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Anticholinergic drugs can cause adverse events (AEs) in older adults. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can detect prescriptions with a high anticholinergic load. Our starting hypothesis was that the anticholinergic load could be reduced by combining a CDSS with a strategy for generating pharmacist interventions. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of this combination on the change over time in the anticholinergic load in hospitalized older adults.

Methods: This prospective, single-centre study was divided into two 6-week periods. During the interventional period, a pharmacist analyzed the alerts generated by the CDSS for 30 targeted anticholinergic drugs and decided whether to issue a pharmacist intervention. A control period corresponds to standard care. The primary endpoint of the study is the delta of the anticholinergic load between the alert and hospital discharge; the secondary endpoint is the incidence of anticholinergic adverse events (AEs).

Results: Of the 144 alerts generated, 87 were considered to be relevant (36 in the interventional period and 51 in the control period). A significant difference was observed between the delta anticholinergic load between the experimental and control periods (1.61 vs. 0.67, p-value = 0.0115). For the targeted drugs (n = 94) over the 87 alerts, 46.8% were for antihistamines and 21.3% were for desloratadine. Of the 36 pharmacist interventions sent by the pharmacist, 19 (52.8%) were accepted. The most deprescribed drug class was the antihistamine class (n = 7), and the most deprescribed drug was amitriptyline (n = 5). Among these 87 patients with alerts, the correlation between the anticholinergic load and the number of AEs was not statistically significant (p = 0.887). The most common AE affecting the peripheral nervous system was constipation (28.6%), and the most common AE affecting the central nervous system was confusion (29.9%).

Conclusions: Our results showed that the combination of specific CDSS rules with pharmacist-mediated risk management procedures could further reduce the anticholinergic load in hospitalized older adults, relative to routine care. It remains to be determined whether this reduction in the anticholinergic load has an impact on the incidence of peripheral and central anticholinergic AEs, and thus the health of these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床决策支持系统对老年患者抗胆碱能负荷随时间变化的影响:SADP-Antichol 研究。
目的:抗胆碱能药物可导致老年人发生不良事件(AE)。临床决策支持系统(CDSS)可以检测出抗胆碱能负荷较高的处方。我们最初的假设是,通过将 CDSS 与药剂师干预策略相结合,可以减少抗胆碱能药物负荷。本研究的目的是评估这一组合对住院老年人抗胆碱能负荷随时间推移而变化的影响:这项前瞻性单中心研究分为两个为期 6 周的阶段。在干预期,药剂师分析 CDSS 对 30 种目标抗胆碱能药物发出的警报,并决定是否进行药剂师干预。对照期为标准护理期。研究的主要终点是发出警报与出院之间的抗胆碱能药物负荷δ;次要终点是抗胆碱能药物不良事件(AEs)的发生率:在生成的 144 个警报中,有 87 个被认为是相关的(干预期 36 个,对照期 51 个)。实验期和对照期的抗胆碱能负荷δ之间存在明显差异(1.61 对 0.67,P 值 = 0.0115)。在 87 次警报的目标药物(n = 94)中,46.8% 用于抗组胺药,21.3% 用于地氯雷他定。在药剂师发出的 36 次干预中,19 次(52.8%)被接受。处方最多的药物类别是抗组胺类药物(7 人),处方最多的药物是阿米替林(5 人)。在这87名警报患者中,抗胆碱能药物负荷与AEs数量之间的相关性无统计学意义(p = 0.887)。影响周围神经系统最常见的 AE 是便秘(28.6%),影响中枢神经系统最常见的 AE 是精神错乱(29.9%):我们的研究结果表明,与常规护理相比,将特定的 CDSS 规则与药剂师介导的风险管理程序相结合,可以进一步减少住院老年人的抗胆碱能负荷。抗胆碱能药物负荷的减少是否会影响外周和中枢抗胆碱能药物不良反应的发生率,进而影响这些患者的健康,还有待进一步确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and Experiences of Patients Regarding Gender-Specific Aspects of Pain Management. Assessment of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions of Psycholeptics and Antidepressants in Outpatient Settings. Tackling Pharmaceutical Pollution Along the Product Lifecycle: Roles and Responsibilities for Producers, Regulators and Prescribers. Evaluating Pharmacists' Knowledge of Food-Drug Interactions in Croatia: Identifying Gaps and Opportunities. Cardiovascular Diseases and Metabolic Medications in the Lebanese Population: A Post Hoc Analysis from a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1