The Incidence of Popeye Deformity After Soft-Tissue Biceps Tenodesis Is Comparable to Biceps Anchor Tenodesis and Lower Than Biceps Tenotomy During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Hyun Gon Kim M.D. , Su Cheol Kim M.D. , Jong Hun Park M.D. , Jae Soo Kim M.D. , Dong Hun Suh M.D., Ph.D. , Sang Min Lee Ph.D. , Jae Chul Yoo M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"The Incidence of Popeye Deformity After Soft-Tissue Biceps Tenodesis Is Comparable to Biceps Anchor Tenodesis and Lower Than Biceps Tenotomy During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair","authors":"Hyun Gon Kim M.D. ,&nbsp;Su Cheol Kim M.D. ,&nbsp;Jong Hun Park M.D. ,&nbsp;Jae Soo Kim M.D. ,&nbsp;Dong Hun Suh M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Sang Min Lee Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jae Chul Yoo M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between biceps anchor tenodesis (AT), biceps soft-tissue tenodesis (ST), and biceps tenotomy (TT) for patients with concomitant rotator cuff repair (RCR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR for full-thickness rotator cuff tears with AT, ST, or TT with minimum 2-year follow-up. All biceps procedures were performed arthroscopically, and ST consisted of fixation to the transverse humeral ligament. We excluded massive rotator cuff tears, additional biceps procedures, and revisions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (visual analog scale [VAS] pain score, VAS functional score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant score) and elbow flexion (EF) strength were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 155 patients (50 AT, 52 ST, and 53 TT patients) were included in this study. The AT group was younger (mean age, 58.7 ± 6.3 years in AT group, 67.6 ± 5.0 years in ST group, and 66.1 ± 5.3 years in TT group) and had a lower proportion of female patients (13 [26.0%] in AT group, 31 [59.6%] in ST group, 39 [73.6%] in TT group) than the ST and TT groups (all <em>P</em> &lt; .001). At final follow-up, PROM scores were significantly improved in all 3 groups (all <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The VAS pain score (<em>P</em> = .134), VAS functional score (<em>P</em> = .616), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (<em>P</em> = .093) at final follow-up showed no significant differences between the 3 groups. The Constant score and EF strength were significantly higher in the AT group than in the ST and TT groups preoperatively (<em>P</em> = .009 for Constant score, <em>P</em> = .033 for EF strength) and at final follow-up (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 for Constant score, <em>P</em> &lt; .001 for EF strength). There was no significant difference in mean improvement in PROM scores and EF strength or in the proportion of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference. The incidence of Popeye deformity was significantly higher in the TT group (n = 11, 20.8%) than in the AT group (n = 3, 5.8%) and ST group (n = 4, 8.0%) (<em>P</em> = .035). Regression analysis showed that TT (odds ratio, 15.6; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and male sex (odds ratio, 103.9; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) were associated with Popeye deformity and that ST (coefficient, –0.51; <em>P</em> = .035) was associated with bicipital groove pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Biceps AT, ST, and TT during arthroscopic RCR showed good clinical outcomes. Although there was a possibility of selection bias, there was no significant difference in mean improvement in clinical outcomes between the 3 long head of the biceps tendon procedures. The incidence of Popeye deformity was higher in the TT group, and that of biceps groove pain was higher in the ST group.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 7","pages":"Pages 2200-2210"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324009733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between biceps anchor tenodesis (AT), biceps soft-tissue tenodesis (ST), and biceps tenotomy (TT) for patients with concomitant rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR for full-thickness rotator cuff tears with AT, ST, or TT with minimum 2-year follow-up. All biceps procedures were performed arthroscopically, and ST consisted of fixation to the transverse humeral ligament. We excluded massive rotator cuff tears, additional biceps procedures, and revisions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (visual analog scale [VAS] pain score, VAS functional score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant score) and elbow flexion (EF) strength were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up.

Results

A total of 155 patients (50 AT, 52 ST, and 53 TT patients) were included in this study. The AT group was younger (mean age, 58.7 ± 6.3 years in AT group, 67.6 ± 5.0 years in ST group, and 66.1 ± 5.3 years in TT group) and had a lower proportion of female patients (13 [26.0%] in AT group, 31 [59.6%] in ST group, 39 [73.6%] in TT group) than the ST and TT groups (all P < .001). At final follow-up, PROM scores were significantly improved in all 3 groups (all P < .001). The VAS pain score (P = .134), VAS functional score (P = .616), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .093) at final follow-up showed no significant differences between the 3 groups. The Constant score and EF strength were significantly higher in the AT group than in the ST and TT groups preoperatively (P = .009 for Constant score, P = .033 for EF strength) and at final follow-up (P < .001 for Constant score, P < .001 for EF strength). There was no significant difference in mean improvement in PROM scores and EF strength or in the proportion of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference. The incidence of Popeye deformity was significantly higher in the TT group (n = 11, 20.8%) than in the AT group (n = 3, 5.8%) and ST group (n = 4, 8.0%) (P = .035). Regression analysis showed that TT (odds ratio, 15.6; P < .001) and male sex (odds ratio, 103.9; P < .001) were associated with Popeye deformity and that ST (coefficient, –0.51; P = .035) was associated with bicipital groove pain.

Conclusions

Biceps AT, ST, and TT during arthroscopic RCR showed good clinical outcomes. Although there was a possibility of selection bias, there was no significant difference in mean improvement in clinical outcomes between the 3 long head of the biceps tendon procedures. The incidence of Popeye deformity was higher in the TT group, and that of biceps groove pain was higher in the ST group.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在关节镜下肩袖修复术中,软组织肱二头肌腱鞘切除术后大力水手畸形的发生率与肱二头肌锚腱鞘切除术相当,低于肱二头肌腱鞘切除术。
目的:本研究旨在比较同时接受肩袖修复术(RCR)的患者接受肱二头肌锚定腱切开术(AT)、软组织腱切开术(ST)和腱切开术(TT)的效果:这项回顾性研究回顾了在关节镜下接受全厚肩袖修复术(RCR)的患者,并进行了AT、ST和TT手术,随访至少2年。所有肱二头肌手术均在关节镜下进行,ST固定在肱骨横韧带上。我们排除了大面积RCT、额外的肱二头肌手术和翻修手术。在术前和最终随访中评估了PROM(PVAS、FVAS、ASES、Constant)和肘关节屈曲(EF)力量:本研究共纳入 155 名患者(AT:50 人,ST:52 人,TT:53 人)。与 ST 组和 TT 组相比,AT 组更年轻(平均年龄:AT:58.7 ± 6.3;ST:67.6 ± 5.0;TT:66.1 ± 5.3),女性比例更低(AT:13 (26.0%);ST:31 (59.6%);TT:39 (73.6%))(所有 P < .001)。在最终随访中,三组的 PROM 评分均有明显改善(均 P < .001)。最终随访时,PVAS(P = .134)、FVAS(P = .616)和 ASES 评分(P = .093)在三组之间无明显差异。术前(Constant:P = .009,EF strength:P = .033)和最终随访(Constant:P < .001,EF strength:P < .001)时,AT 组的 Constant 得分和 EF strength 均明显高于 ST 组和 TT 组。PROM评分和EF强度的平均改善程度以及达到MCID的比例无明显差异。与 AT 组(n = 3,5.8%)和 ST 组(n = 4,8.0%)相比,TT 组(n = 11,20.8%)的大力水手畸形发生率明显更高(P = .035)。回归分析显示,TT(OR = 15.6,P < .001)和男性(OR = 103.9,P < .001)与大力水手畸形有关,ST(Coeffieicnt = -0.51,P = .035)与肱二头肌沟疼痛有关:结论:关节镜下肩袖修复术中的肱二头肌锚定腱切开术、软组织腱切开术和腱切开术显示出良好的临床效果。虽然存在选择偏差的可能性,但三种 LHBT 手术在临床效果的平均改善程度上并无显著差异。腱膜切开组的大力水手畸形发生率较高,软组织腱膜切除组的肱二头肌沟疼痛发生率较高:III,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Instructions for Authors Announcements Masthead Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1